Digital Twins (DT) have become popular in various industries to solve complex problems. A true DT allows for bidirectional real-time data flows between the physical and virtual worlds.
The term DT was often overused, leading to confusion about its capabilities therefore this paper provides a review of the current state of DT and its applications in the minerals industry. Existing literature shows a slow adoption of DTs in the minerals industry, which is largely due to challenges associated with geological unpredictability, legacy system integration, cost, skill gaps, cybersecurity, and lack of standards.
Combining immersive visualisation with real-time spatial computer graphics could improve the usability and acceptance of DTs in the minerals industry which has been used successfully in training while underexplored for operational scenarios. The study concludes by highlighting the need for further research to understand the effectiveness of such an approach in mineral operations.
AgostinelliS, CumoF, GuidiG, TomazzoliC.2021. Cyber-physical systems improving building energy management: digital twin and artificial intelligence. Energies. 14(8):2338. doi:10.3390/en14082338.
2.
AgouzoulA, TabaaM, ChegariB, SimeuE, DandacheA, AlamiK.2021. Towards a digital twin model for building energy management: case of Morocco. Procedia Comput Sci. 184:404–410. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.051.
3.
AliSH, GiurcoD, ArndtN, NicklessE, BrownG, DemetriadesA, DurrheimR, EnriquezMA, KinnairdJ, LittleboyA, . 2017. Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature. 543(7645):367–372. doi:10.1038/nature21359.
4.
AlshammariK, BeachT, RezguiY.2021. Cybersecurity for digital twins in the built environment: current research and future directions. J, Inform Techn Construct. 26:159–173. doi:10.36680/j.itcon.2021.010.
5.
BertoniA, MachchharRJ, LarssonT, FrankB.2022. Digital twins of operational scenarios in mining for design of customized product-service systems solutions. Proceedings of the 32nd CIRP design conference - design in a changing world; Elsevier. 532–537. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.290.
6.
BrennerB, HummelV.2017. Digital twin as enabler for an innovative digital shopfloor management system in the ESB Logistics Learning Factory at Reutlingen - University. Proced Manufact. 9:198–205. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.039.
7.
BrosinskyC, SongX, WestermannD.2019. Digital twin - concept of a continuously adaptive power system mirror. Esslingen, Germany: International ETG-Congress 2019; ETG Symposium.
8.
BruneJ.2010. Training for tomorrow - application of virtual reality training for the mining industry. In: Extracting the science - a century of mining research. Sydney: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME); p. 517–519.
9.
CalkaM, PerrierP, OhayonJ, GrivotBC, RochetteM, PayanY.2020. Real-time simulations of human tongue movements with a reduced order model of a non-linear dynamic biomechanical model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 23(1):55–57. doi:10.1080/10255842.2020.1812158.
10.
CerroneA, HochhalterJ, HeberG, IngraffeaA.2014. On the effects of modeling as-manufactured geometry: toward digital twin. Int J Aerospace Eng. 2014:1–10. doi:10.1155/2014/439278.
11.
CiminoC, NegriE, FumagalliL.2019. Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing. Comput Ind. 113:103–130. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130.
12.
CoetzeeBJ, SonnendeckerPW.2022. Fully automated coal quality control using digital twin material tracking and statistical model predictive control for yield optimization during production of semi soft coking- and power station coal. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 122(8):1–7. doi:10.17159/2411-9717/2002/2022.
13.
DebRoyT, ZhangW, TurnerJ, BabuSS.2017. Building digital twins of 3D printing machines. Scr Mater. 135:119–124. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.005.
14.
DeryabinSA, TemkinIO, ZykovSV.2020. About some issues of developing digital twins for the intelligent process control in quarries. Procedia Comput Sci. 176:3210–3216. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.128.
El BaziN, MabroukiM, ChebakA, HammouchF.2022. Digital twin architecture for mining industry: case study of a stacker machine in an experimental open-pit mine. Proceedings of the 4th global power, energy and communication conference (GPECOM); Cappadocia, Turkey.
17.
El BaziN, MabroukiM, LaayatiO, OuhabiN, El HadraouiH, HammouchF, ChebakA.2023. Generic multi-layered digital-twin-framework-enabled asset lifecycle management for the sustainable mining industry. Sustainability. 15(4):3470. doi:10.3390/su15043470.
18.
FarrellyCT, DaviesJ.2021. Interoperability, integration, and digital twins for mining—part 1: pathways to the network-centric mine. IEEE Ind Electron Mag. 15(3):13–21. doi:10.1109/MIE.2020.3029391.
19.
FarrellyCT, DaviesJ.2021. Interoperability, integration, and digital twins for mining—part 2: pathways to the network-centric mine. IEEE Ind Electron Mag. 15(3):22–31. doi:10.1109/MIE.2020.3029388.
20.
FergusonS, BennettE, IvashchenkoA.2017. Digital twin tackles design challenges. World Pumps. 2017(4):26–28. doi:10.1016/S0262-1762(17)30139-6.
21.
FraserS, DuffE.2012. Towards the intelligent future mine: the case for the common mine model. Proceedings of the 34th international geological congress; Brisbane.
22.
FrazzonEM, AlbrechtA, HurtadoPA.2016. Simulation-based optimization for the integrated scheduling of production and logistic systems. Proceedings of the 8th IFAC conference on manufacturing modelling, management and control MIM; Jun 28-30; Troyes, France: Elsevier Ltd. p. 1050–1055.
23.
FriedrichC, LechlerA, VerlA.2014. Autonomous systems for maintenance tasks – requirements and design of a control architecture. Proced Techn. 15:595–604. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.020.
24.
FuT, ZhangT, LvY, SongX, LiG, YueH.2023. Digital twin-based excavation trajectory generation of uncrewed excavators for autonomous mining. Autom Constr. 151:104855. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104855.
25.
FullerA, FanZ, DayC, BarlowC.2020. Digital twin: enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access. 8:108952–108971. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358.
26.
GrievesM.2005. Product lifecycle management: driving the next generation of lean thinking. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
27.
GrievesM.2011. Virtually perfect: driving innovative and lean products through product lifecycle management. Boston (USA): Space Coast Press.
28.
HazrathosseiniA, MoradiAA.2023. The advent of digital twins in surface mining: its time has finally arrived. Res Policy. 80:103155. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103155.
29.
HirschPB.2022. Adventures in the metaverse. J Bus Strategy. 43(5):332–336. doi:10.1108/JBS-06-2022-0101.
30.
HodgkinsonJH, ElmouttieM.2020. Cousins, siblings and twins: a review of the geological model's place in the digital mine. Resources. 9(3):24. doi:10.3390/resources9030024.
31.
HuL, NguyenN, TaoW.2018. Modeling of cloud-based digital twins for smart manufacturing with MT connect. Proced Manufact. 26:1193–1203. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.155.
32.
HuangY, YuanB, XuS, HanT.2022. Fault diagnosis of permanent magnet synchronous motor of coal mine belt conveyor based on digital twin and ISSA-RF. Processes. 10(9):1679. doi:10.3390/pr10091679.
33.
JainS, FongCN, Maung AyeK, LuoM.2001. Virtual factory: an integrated approach to manufacturing systems modeling. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 21(5/6):594–608. doi:10.1108/01443570110390354.
KritzingerW, KarnerM, TraarG, HenjesJ, SihnW.2018. Digital twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 51(11):1016–1022. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474.
37.
KukushkinK, RyabovY, BorovkovA.2022. Digital twins: a systematic literature review based on data analysis and topic modeling. MDPI Data. 7(12):173. doi:10.3390/data7120173.
38.
KwokPK, YanM, QuT, LauHYK.2020. User acceptance of virtual reality technology for practicing digital twin-based crisis management. International journal of computer integrated manufacturing. 34(7-8):874–887. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2020.1803502.
39.
LeBlanc SmithG, CarisC, SooleP.1998. Interactive evaluation of mine plans with integrated geological exploration data. The Australian Coal Industry's Research Program. https://www.acarp.com.au/abstracts.aspx?repId=C5026.
40.
LeeJ, LapiraE, YangS, KaoA.2013. Predictive manufacturing system - trends of next-generation production systems. Proceed 11th IFAC Workshop on Intellig Manufact Sys, Elsevier. 46(7):150–156.
41.
LiC, MahadevanS.2017. A dynamic Bayesian network approach for Digital Twin 19th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, Texas.
42.
LiL, AslamS, WilemanA, PerinpanayagamS.2022. Digital Twin in Aerospace Industry: A Gentle Introduction. IEEE Access. 10:9543–9562. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3136458.
43.
LiangR, HuangC, ZhangC, LiB, SaydamS, CanbulatI.2023. Exploring the fusion potentials of data visualization and data analytics in the process of mining digitalization. IEEE Access. 11:40608–40628. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3267813.
44.
LitvinovaY, RehmS, GoelLC, JunglasI.2018 Jan. Collaborating in virtual reality by using digital twins. Ispim conference proceedings. Manchester.
45.
LiuK, ChenL, LiL, RenH, WangF.2023. Metamining: mining in the Metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Systems, man, and Cybernetics. Systems. 53(6):3858–3867. doi:10.1109/TSMC.2022.3233588.
46.
LiuQ, LiuB, WangG, ZhangC.2019. A comparative study on digital twin models. AIP conference proceedings 2073; Jan 19-20; Wuhan, People's Republic of China: AIP Publishing.
47.
LuQ, ParlikadAK, WoodallP, Don RanasingheG, XieX, LiangZ, KonstantinouE, HeatonJ, SchoolingJ.2020. Developing a digital twin at building and city levels: case study of west Cambridge campus. J Manag Eng. 36(3). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763.
48.
LuY, LiuC, WangKI, HuangH, XuX.2020. Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: connotation, reference model, applications and research issues. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 61:101837. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837. (OXFORD: Elsevier Ltd).
49.
LuoW, HuT, ZhangC, WeiY.2019. Digital twin for CNC machine tool: modelling and using strategy. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 10(3):1129–1140. doi:10.1007/s12652-018-0946-5. (Berlin: Springer).
50.
LuttersE, DamgraveR.2019. The development of pilot production environments based on digital twins and virtual dashboards. Procedia CIRP. 84:94–99. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.228.
51.
NagovitsynOV, StepachevaAV.2021. Digital twin of solid mineral deposit. J Min Sci. 57(6):1033–1040. doi:10.1134/S1062739121060168.
52.
NarayananSS.1987. Modelling the performance of industrial ball mills using single particle breakage data. Int J Miner Process. 20(3):211–228. doi:10.1016/0301-7516(87)90067-6.
53.
Okol'nishnikovVV, OrdinAA, RudometovSV.2021. Development of a digital model of mining face of coal mine. Optoelectron Instrum Data Process. 57:659–667. doi:10.3103/S8756699021060108.
54.
OuahabiN, ChebakA, ZegrariM, KamachO, BerquedichM.2021. A distributed digital twin architecture for shop floor monitoring based on edge-cloud collaboration. Third international conference on transportation and smart technologies (TST); Tangier, Morocco.
55.
PandyaHB, ChampaneriaTA.2017. Enhancement of security in IoTSyS framework. In: ModiN, VermaP, TrivediB, editors. Proceedings of the international conference on communication and networks, advances on intelligent systems and computing. Singapore: Springer; p. 31–43. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2750-5_4.
56.
PérezL, Rodriguez-JimenezS, RodriguezN, UsamentiagaR, GarciaDF.2020. Digital twin and virtual reality based methodology for multi-robot manufacturing cell commissioning. Appl Sci. 10(10):3633. doi:10.3390/app10103633. (Basel: MDPI).
57.
PolyakovR, PaholkinE, KudryavcevI, KrupeninN.2020. Improving the safety of power plants by developing a digital twin and an expert system for adaptive-predictive analysis of the operability of gas turbine units. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo; Sep 21-25; Virtual, Online: ASME.
58.
QiQ, TaoF, HuT, AnwerN, LiuA, WeiY, WangL, NeeAYC.2021. Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. J Manuf Syst. 58:3–21. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001.
59.
RedelinghuysAJH, BassonAH, KrugerK.2020. A six-layer architecture for the digital twin: a manufacturing case study implementation. J Intell Manuf. 31(6):1383–1402. doi:10.1007/s10845-019-01516-6. (Dordrecht: Springer).
60.
RosenR, von WichertG, LoG, BettenhausenKD.2015. About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. Proceedings of the 15th IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing; Elsevier. 567–572.
61.
SaadA, FaddelS, MohammedO.2020. IoT-Based digital twin for energy cyber-physical systems: design and implementation. Energies. 13(18). doi:10.3390/en13184762.
62.
SavolainenJ, UrbaniM.2021. Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation example from the mining industry. J Intell Manuf. 32(7):1953–1973. doi:10.1007/s10845-021-01740-z.
63.
SchleichB, AnwerN, MathieuL, WartzackS.2017. Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Ann. 66(1):141–144. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040. (AMSTERDAM: Elsevier Ltd).
64.
SchluseM, RossmannJ.2016. From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE); Oct 3–5. p.1–6.
65.
SchroederGN, SteinmetzC, PereiraCE, EspindolaDB.2016. Digital twin data modeling with AutomationML and a communication methodology for data exchange. Proceedings of the 4th IFAC symposium on telematics applications; Nov 6-9; Porto Alwegre, Brasil: IFAC-PapersOnLine. p. 12–17. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.115.
ServinM, VesterlundF, WallinE.2021. Digital twins with distributed particle simulation for mine-to-mill material tracking. Minerals. 11(5):524. doi:10.3390/min11050524.
ShibanovDA, IvanovSL, ShishkinPV.2021. Digital technologies in modeling and design of mining excavators. J Phys Conf Ser. 1753(1):12052. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1753/1/012052.
70.
SöderbergR, WärmefjordK, CarlsonJS, LindkvistL.2017. Toward a digital twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Ann. 66(1):137–140. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038.
StothardP.2023. Mining Metaverse – a future collaborative tool for best practice mining. Mining Technology. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):1–14. doi:10.1080/25726668.2023.2235155.
73.
StothardP, SquelchA, StoneR, Van WykE.2019. Towards sustainable mixed reality simulation for the mining industry. Min Technol. 128(4):246–254. doi:10.1080/25726668.2019.1645519. (Taylor & Francis).
74.
StothardP, SquelchA, StoneR, van WykE, KizilMS, SchofieldD, FowleK.2008. Taxonomy of interactive computer-based visualisation systems and content for the mining industry - part 1 Victoria, Australia.
75.
StothardP, SquelchA, StoneR, van WykE, KizilMS, SchofieldD, FowleK.2015. Taxonomy of interactive computer-based visualisation systems and content for the mining industry - part 2. Transact Inst Min Metall. Sect A, Min Techn. 124(2):83–96. doi:10.1179/1743286315Y.0000000006. Taylor & Francis.
76.
TaoF, ZhangM.2017. Digital twin shop-floor: a new shop-floor paradigm towards smart manufacturing. IEEE Access. 5:20418–20427. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756069.
77.
TemkinI, MyaskovA, DeryabinS, KonovI, IvannikovA.2021. Design of a digital 3D model of transport–technological environment of open-pit mines based on the common use of telemetric and geospatial information. Sensors. 21(18):6277. doi:10.3390/s21186277.
78.
TuegelEJ, IngraffeaAR, EasonTG, SpottswoodSM.2011. Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int J Aerospace Eng. 2011:1–14. doi:10.1155/2011/154798.
79.
TurnerRM, MacLaughlinMM, IversonSR.2020. Identifying and mapping potentially adverse discontinuities in underground excavations using thermal and multispectral UAV imagery. Eng Geol. 266:105470. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105470.
80.
UmJ, WeyerS, QuintF.2017. Plug-and-simulate within modular assembly line enabled by digital twins and the use of AutomationML. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 50(1):15904–15909. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2360.
81.
Unity Real-Time Development Platform | 3D, 2D, VR & AR Engine. 2023. Online: Unity Technologies; [accessed 2023 Jun 22]. https://unity.com
82.
VolodinVS, TolokonskiiAO.2019. Concept of instrumentation of digital twins of nuclear power plants units as observers for digital NPP I&C system. J Phys. Conf Ser. 1391(1):12083. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1391/1/012083.
WangJ, MaY, ZhangL, GaoRX, WuD.2018. Deep learning for smart manufacturing: methods and applications. J Manuf Syst. 48:144–156. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.003.
85.
Web3D Consortium. 2023. What is X3D: open standards for real-time 3D communication; [accessed 2023 Jul 16]. https://www.web3d.org/x3d/what-x3d.
86.
XieJ, WangX, YangZ; HaoS.2019. Virtual monitoring method for hydraulic supports based on digital twin theory. Min Technol, 128(2): 77–87. doi:10.1080/25726668.2019.1569367.
87.
ZakrajsekAJ.2017. The development and use of a digital twin model for tire touchdown health monitoring. Proceedings of the 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference; Jan 9–13; Grapevine, Texas: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). p. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0863.
88.
ZhironkinaO, ZhironkinS.2023. Technological and Intellectual Transition to Mining 4.0: A Review. Energies. 16(3):1427. doi:10.3390/en16031427.
