The present studies investigate the hypothesis that individuals who frequently report experiencing episodes of mind wandering do so because they under-invest attentional/executive resources in the external environment. Here we examined whether self-reported instances of mind wandering predict the magnitude of the “attentional blink” (AB) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task, since a prominent view is that the AB derives from an over-investment of attention in the information stream. Study 1 demonstrates that subjective reports of mind wandering in a sustained attention task have a negative predictive relation with respect to the magnitude of the AB measured in a subsequent RSVP task. In addition, using the Spontaneous and Deliberate Mind Wandering Questionnaire in Study 2, we were again able to show that trait-level mind wandering in everyday life negatively predicts AB magnitude. We suggest that mind wandering may be the behavioural outcome of an adaptive cognitive style intended to maximize the efficient processing of dynamic and temporally unpredictable events.
ArendI., JohnstonS., & ShapiroK. (2006). Task-irrelevant visual motion and flicker attenuate the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 600–607.
2.
ArmstrongI. T., & MunozD. P. (2003). Attentional blink in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Influence of eye movements. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 242–250.
3.
BairdB., SmallwoodJ., MrazekM. D., KamJ. W., FranklinM. S., & SchoolerJ. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23, 1117–1122.
4.
BairdB., SmallwoodJ., & SchoolerJ. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1604–1611.
5.
BarronE., RibyL. M., GreerJ., & SmallwoodJ. (2011). Absorbed in thought: The effect of mind wandering on the processing of relevant and irrelevant events. Psychological Science, 22, 596–601.
6.
CarriereJ. S., SeliP., & SmilekD. (2013). Wandering in both mind and body: Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 19–31.
7.
CousineauD., CharbonneauD., & JolicoeurP. (2006). Parameterizing the attentional blink effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 175–189.
8.
DuxP. E., & MaroisR. (2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1683–1700.
9.
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.
10.
ForsterS., & LavieN. (2014). Distracted by your mind? Individual differences in distractibility predict mind wandering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 251–260.
11.
HeJ., BecicE., LeeY. C., & McCarleyJ. S. (2011). Mind wandering behind the Wheel: Performance and oculomotor correlates. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53, 13–21.
12.
HuN., HeS., & XuB. (2012). Different efficiencies of attentional orienting in different wandering minds. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 139–148.
13.
JefferiesL. N., SmilekD., EichE., & EnnsJ. T. (2008). Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control. Psychological Science, 19, 290–295.
14.
KillingsworthM. A., & GilbertD. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932. doi:10.1126/science.1192439
15.
MacLeanM. H., & ArnellK. M. (2012). A conceptual and methodological framework for measuring and modulating the attentional blink. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1080–1097.
16.
MailletD. & RajahM. N. (2013). Age related changes in frequency of mind wandering and task related interferences during memory encoding and their impact on retrieval. Memory, 21, 818–831.
17.
MartensS., & WybleB. (2010). The attentional blink: Past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 947–957.
18.
McVayJ. C., & KaneM. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 196–204.
19.
McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188–197.
20.
MooneyhamB. W., & SchoolerJ. (2013). The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: A review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 11–18.
21.
OliversC. N. L., & NieuwenhuisS. (2005). The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 16, 265–269.
22.
OliversC. N., & NieuwenhuisS. (2006). The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 364–379.
23.
PeeblesD., & BothellD. (2004). Modelling performance in the sustained attention to response task. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 231–236). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University/University of Pittsburgh.
24.
PeirceJ. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13.
25.
RaymondJ. E., ShapiroK. L., & ArnellK. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.
26.
RobertsonI. H., ManlyT., AndradeJ., BaddeleyB. T., & YiendJ. (1997). “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.
27.
SeliP., CheyneJ. A., BartonK. R., & SmilekD. (2012). Consistency of sustained attention across modalities: Comparing visual and auditory versions of the SART. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 44–50.
28.
SeliP., CheyneJ. A., & SmilekD. (2013). Wandering minds and wavering rhythms: Linking mind wandering and behavioral variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1–5.
29.
ShapiroK. L., RaymondJ. E., & ArnellK. M. (1997). The attentional blink. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 291–296.
30.
Smallwood, J. (2010). Why the global availability of mind wandering necessitates resource competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 202–207.
31.
Smallwood, J. (2011). Mind-wandering while reading: Attentional decoupling, mindless reading and the cascade model of inattention. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 63–77.
32.
Smallwood, J. (2013). Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: A process–occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 519–535.
33.
SmallwoodJ., McSpaddenM., & SchoolerJ. W. (2007). The lights are on but no one's home: Meta awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 527–533.
34.
Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1144–1150.
35.
SmallwoodJ., & SchoolerJ. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.
36.
TaatgenN. A., JuvinaI., SchipperM., BorstJ. P., & MartensS. (2009). Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 1–29.
37.
ThomsonD. R., BesnerD., & SmilekD. (2013). In pursuit of off-task thought: Mind wandering-performance trade-offs while reading aloud and color naming. Frontiers in Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00360
38.
ThomsonD. R., SeliP.BesnerD., & SmilekD. (2014). On the relation between mind wandering and task performance over time. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 14–26.
39.
ThomsonD. R., SmilekD., & BesnerD. (2014). On the asymmetric effects of mind wandering on levels of processing at encoding and retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin, & Review, 21, 728–733.
40.
van VugtM. K., & SlagterH. A. (2014). Control over experience? Magnitude of the attentional blink depends on meditative state. Consciousness and Cognition, 23, 32–39.
