Visual search for a unique target is impaired when a salient distractor is presented (attentional capture). This phenomenon is said to occur because attention is diverted to a distractor before it reaches the target. Similarly, perception of the second of two targets embedded in a rapid stream of nontargets is impaired, suggesting attentional deprivation due to the processing of the first target (attentional blink). We examined whether these phenomena emerge from a common underlying attentional mechanism by using correlation studies. If these phenomena share a common foundation, the magnitude of these deficits should show within-subject correlations. Participants (N = 135) revealed significant attentional deficits during spatial and temporal capture and the attentional blink tasks. However, no significant correlation was found among these tasks. Experiment 2 (N = 95) replicated this finding using the same procedure as that used in Experiment 1 but included another attentional blink task that required spatial switching between the two targets. Strong correlations emerged only between the two attentional blink tasks (with/without spatial switching). The present results suggest that attentional deficits during spatial and temporal capture and the attentional blink tasks reflect different aspects of attention.
ArnellK. M.HoweA. E.JoanisseM. F.KleinR. M. (2006). Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks.Memory & Cognition34, 1472–1483.
2.
ArnellK. M.StubitzS. M. (2009). Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory.Psychological Research74, 457–467.
BelopolskyA. V.ZwaanL.TheeuwesJ.KramerA. F. (2007). The size of attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14, 934–938.
5.
BleckleyM. K.DursoF. T.CrutchfieldJ. M.EngleR. W.KhannaM. M. (2003). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review10, 884–889.
6.
BrainardD. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision10, 433–436.
7.
BravoM. J.NakayamaK. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics51, 465–472.
8.
BreitmeyerB. G.EhrensteinA.PritchardK.HiscockM.CrisanJ. (1999). The roles of location specificity and masking mechanisms in the attentional blink.Perception & Psychophysics61, 798–809.
9.
BriandK. A.KleinR. M. (1987). Is Posner's “beam” the same as Treisman's “glue?”: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13, 228–241.
10.
ChunM. M.PotterM. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 109–127.
11.
ColzatoL. S.SpapéM. M. A.PannebakkerM. M.HommelB. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: Blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14, 1051–1057.
12.
ConwayA. R.CowanN.BuntingM. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review8, 331–335.
13.
DaleG.ArnellK. M. (2010). Individual differences in dispositional focus of attention predict attentional blink magnitude.Attention, Perception & Psychophysics72, 602–606.
14.
Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Ghorashi, S. M., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource limitation or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191–200.
15.
DuxP. E.MaroisR. (2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory.Attention, Perception & Psychophysics71, 1683–1700.
16.
EglyR.HomaD. (1984). Sensitization of the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10, 778–793.
17.
FolkC. L.LeberA. B.EgethH. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.Perception & Psychophysics64, 741–753.
18.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 847–858.
19.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W.JohnstonJ. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18, 1030–1044.
20.
FukudaK.VogelE. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture.Journal of Neuroscience29, 8726–8733.
21.
GhorashiS.JefferiesL. N.KawaharaJ.WatanabeK. (2008). Does attention accompany the conscious awareness of both location and identity of an object?.Psyche14, 1–13.
22.
GhorashiS. M. S.ZuvicS. M.VisserT. A. W.Di LolloV. (2003). Focal distraction: Spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance29, 78–91.
23.
HickeyC.McDonaldJ. J.TheeuwesJ. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience18, 604–613.
24.
HommelB.KesslerK.SchmitzF.GrossJ.AkyürekE. G.ShapiroK. (2006). How the brain blinks: Towards a neurocognitive model of the attentional blink.Psychological Research70, 425–435.
JolicœurP.Dell'AcquaR. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation.Cognitive Psychology36, 138–202.
27.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and effort, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28.
KahnemanD.TreismanA.BurkellJ. (1983). The cost of visual filtering.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9, 510–522.
29.
KaneM. J.BleckleyM. K.ConwayA. R.EngleR. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130, 169–183.
30.
KawaharaJ. (2002). Facilitation of local information processing in the attentional blink as indexed by the shooting line illusion.Psychological Research66, 116–123.
31.
KawaharaJ. (2003). The effect of observer's set on the processing of temporally distributed items.Japanese Psychological Research45, 109–114.
32.
Kawahara, J., & Enns, J. T. (2009). Selection difficulty and inter-item competition are independent factors in rapid visual stream perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 146–158.
33.
Kristjánssoná.NakayamaK. (2002). The attentional blink in space and time.Vision Research42, 2039–2050.
34.
KyllonenP. C.ChristalR. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!.Intelligence14, 389–433.
35.
LavieN. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 451–468.
36.
LeberA. B.EgethH. E. (2006). It's under control: Top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review13, 132–138.
37.
MartensS.JohnsonA. (2009). Working memory capacity, intelligence, and the magnitude of the attentional blink revisited.Experimental Brain Research192, 43–52.
38.
MartensS.ValchevN. (2009). Individual differences in the attentional blink: The important role of irrelevant information.Experimental Psychology56, 18–26.
39.
MemmertD.SimonsD. J.GrimmeT. (2008). The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports.Psychology of Sport and Exercise10, 146–151.
40.
NäätänenR. (1988). Implications of ERP data for psychological theories of attention.Biological Psychology26, 117–163.
41.
NieuwensteinM. R. (2006). Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance32, 973–985.
42.
NormanD. A.BobrowD. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes.Cognitive Psychology7, 44–64.
43.
OliversC. N. L.MeeterM. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.Psychological Review115, 836–863.
44.
OphirE.NassC.WagnerA. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA106, 15583–15587.
45.
PelliD. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies.Spatial Vision10, 437–442.
46.
PosnerM. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology32, 3–25.
47.
RaymondJ. E.ShapiroK. L.ArnellK. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18, 849–860.
48.
Seiffert, A. E., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1061–1073.
49.
ShapiroK. L.RaymondJ. E.ArnellK. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 357–371.
50.
ShapiroK. L.SchmitzF.MartensS.HommelB.SchnitzlerA. (2006). Resource sharing in the attentional blink.Neuroreport17, 163–166.
51.
SimonsD. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences4, 147–155.
52.
TheeuwesJ. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics51, 599–606.
TheeuwesJ. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.Acta Psychologica135, 77–99doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006.
55.
van ZoestW.DonkM. (2008). Goal-driven modulation as a function of time in saccadic target selection.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61, 1553–1572.
56.
VisserT. A. W.ZuvicS. M.BischofW. F.Di LolloV. (1999). The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review6, 432–436.
57.
VogelE. K.McColloughA. W.MachizawaM. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.Nature438, 500–503.
