Latent semantic analysis (LSA) and transitional probability (TP), two computational methods used to reflect lexical semantic representation from large text corpora, were employed to examine the effects of word predictability on Chinese reading. Participants’ eye movements were monitored, and the influence of word complexity (number of strokes), word frequency, and word predictability on different eye movement measures (first-fixation duration, gaze duration, and total time) were examined. We found influences of TP on first-fixation duration and gaze duration and of LSA on total time. The results suggest that TP reflects an early stage of lexical processing while LSA reflects a later stage.
Academia SinicaAcademia Sinica Balanced Corpus (Version 3) [Electronic database]Taipei, Taiwan: Author1998.
2.
BaiX.YanG.LiversedgeS. P.ZangC.RaynerK. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance34, 1277–1288.
3.
BerryM. W.DrmacZ.JessupE. (1999). Matrices, vector spaces, and information retrieval.SIAM Review41, 335–362.
4.
BostonM. F.HaleJ.KlieglR.PatilU.VasishthS. (2008). Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus.Journal of Eye Movement Research2, 11, 1–12. Retrieved October 29, 2009, from http://www.jemr.org/online/2/1/1.
5.
ChenH.-C.SongH.LauW. Y.WongK. F. E.TangS. L. (2003). Developmental characteristics of eye movements during reading.McBride-ChangC.ChenH. C.Reading development in Chinese children.Westport, CT: Praeger157–169.
6.
ChenM. L.WangH. C.KoH. W. (2009). Using latent semantic analysis to create a Chinese semantic space and the validation of psychological reality.Journal of Chinese Psychology Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
DembergV.KellerF. (2008). Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity.Cognition109, 193–210.
8.
DumaisS. (1991). Improving the retrieval of information from external sources.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers23, 229–236.
9.
EhrlichS. F.RaynerK. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior20, 641–655.
10.
EngbertR.LongtinA.KlieglR. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing.Vision Research42, 621–636.
11.
FrissonS.RaynerK.PickeringM. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability of eye movements during reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 862–877.
12.
HuangC. R.ChenK. J.ChenF. Y.ChangL. L. (1997). Segmentation standard for Chinese natural language processing.Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language2, 247–62.
13.
HueC. W.ChenY. J.ChangS. H. (1996). Word association for 600 Chinese homographs.Chinese Journal of Psychology38, 67–169.
14.
JessupE.MartinJ. (2001). Taking a new look at the latent semantic analysis approach to information retrieval.BerryM. W.Computational information retrieval.Philadelphia: SIAM121–144.
15.
JonesM. N.MewhortD. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon.Psychological Review114, 1–37.
16.
KlieglR.GrabnerE.RolfsM.EngbertR. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology16, 262–284.
17.
LandauerT. K.DumaisS. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.Psychological Review104, 211–240.
18.
LandauerT. K.McNamaraD. S.DennisS.KintschW. (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysisMahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
LizzaM.SartorettoF. (2001). A comparative analysis of LSI strategies.BerryM. W.Computational information retrieval.Philadelphia: SIAM171–181.
20.
LorchR. F.MyersJ. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory, and Cognition16, 149–157.
21.
McDonaldS. A.ShillcockR. C. (2003a). Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading.Psychological Science14, 648–652.
22.
McDonaldS. A.ShillcockR. C. (2003b). Low-level predictive inference in reading: The influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements.Vision Research43, 1735–1751.
23.
Ministry of Education, ROCChinese dictionary1998Retrieved June 17, 2007, from: http://140.111.34.46/dict/.
24.
NoortgateW. V. DOnghenaP. (2006). Analysing repeated measures data in cognitive research: A comment on regression coefficient analyses.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology18, 937–952.
25.
OngJ. K. Y.KlieglR. (2008). Conditional co-occurrence probability acts like frequency in predicting fixation durations.Journal of Eye Movement Research2, 13, 1–7. Retrived October 29, 2009, from http://www.jemr.org/online/2/1/3.
26.
PollatsekA.ReichleE. D.RaynerK. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control.Cognitive Psychology52, 1–56.
27.
PynteJ.NewB.KennedyA. (2008). A multiple regression analysis of syntactic and semantic influences in reading normal text.Journal of Eye Movement Research2, 14, 1–11. Retrived October 29, 2009, from http://www.jemr.org/online/2/1/4.
28.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin124, 372–422.
29.
RaynerK.AshbyJ.PollatsekA.ReichleE. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance30, 720–732.
30.
RaynerK.LiX.JuhaszJ. B.YanG. (2005). The effects of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review12, 1089–1093.
31.
RaynerK.LiX.PollatsekA. (2007). Extending the E-Z Reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers.Cognitive Science31, 1021–1033.
32.
RaynerK.WellA. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review3, 504–509.
33.
ReichleE. D.PollatsekA.FisherD. L.RaynerK. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.Psychological Review105, 125–157.
34.
ReichleE. D.RaynerK.PollatsekA. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model.Vision Research39, 4403–4411.
35.
ReichleE. D.RaynerK.PollatsekA. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Behavioral and Brain Sciences26, 445–476.
36.
TaylorW. L. (1953). Cloze Procedure: A new tool for measuring readability.Journalism Quarterly30, 415–433.
37.
YanG.TianH.BaiX.RaynerK. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers.British Journal of Psychology97, 259–268.
