Self-glazed zirconia has been recently developed and widely used in crowns owing to its high strength, low wear on opposite teeth, and aesthetic appearance. This clinical study was to explore the application prospect of the bridge restoration made by self-glazed zirconia with a digital process. The results demonstrated that self-glazed zirconia could meet both the aesthetics and functional requirements of anterior and molar teeth in a time-saving and efficient manner.
YildirimM, EdelhoffD, HanischO, Ceramic abutments–a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent. 2000;20(1):81–91.
3.
GuessPC, SchultheisS, BonfanteEA, All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(2):333–352. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.005
BindlA, MormannWH.Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;32(6):441–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
8.
TrubyRL, LewisJA.Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature. 2016;540(7633):371. doi: 10.1038/nature21003
9.
ZhuDB, LiangJP, QuYX, Functionalized bio-artifact fabricated via selective slurry extrusion. Part 2: fabrication of ceramic dental crown. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014;14(5):3703–3706. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2014.7981
10.
ShenZ, LiuL, XuX, Fractography of self-glazed zirconia with improved reliability. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2017;37(14):S0955221917301449. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.008
11.
ReichS, BrungsbergB, TeschnerH, The occlusal precision of laboratory versus CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic crowns. Am J Dent. 2010;23(1):53–56.
12.
CostaJD, PelogiaF, FerracaneBH.Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent. 2010;35(3):324–329. doi: 10.2341/09-178-L
13.
LiuY, WangY, WangD, Self-glazed zirconia reducing the wear to tooth enamel. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2016;36(12):2889–2894. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.029
14.
WenR, DuF, ShenZ, The workflows of a novel self-glazed zirconia for dental prostheses fabrication: case reports. Adv Appl Ceram. 2018;117(12):1–8.
15.
BaroudiK, IbraheemSN.Assessment of chair-side computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorations: a review of the literature. J Int Oral Health Jioh. 2015;7(4):96–104.
16.
WuJ, HuangZ, YangL, The application of net-shape-formed self-glazed zirconia prostheses via a complete digital workflow in oral implant and restoration: a clinical case report. Adv Appl Ceram. 2019. DOI:10.1080/17436753.2019.1580027.
17.
BonfanteEA, SuzukiM, LorenzoniFC, Probability of survival of implant-supported metal ceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns. Dent Mater. 2015;31(8):e168–ee77. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.006
18.
ZhaoM, SunY, ZhangJ, Novel translucent and strong submicron Alumina ceramics for dental restorations. J Dent Res. 2018;97(3):289–295. DOI:10.1177/0022034517733742.
19.
Hee-KyungK, Sung-HunK.Effect of the number of coloring liquid applications on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater Official Public Acad Den Mater. 2014;30(9):e229–ee37. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.04.008
20.
ChoiYS, KimSH, LeeJB, In vitro evaluation of fracture strength of zirconia restoration veneered with various ceramic materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012;4(3):162–169. doi: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.162
21.
ChongBJ, ThangavelAK, RoltonSB, Clinical and laboratory surface finishing procedures for zirconia on opposing human enamel wear: a laboratory study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;50:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.007
22.
ShiA, WuZ, HuangJ, Wear performance of self-glazed zirconia crowns with different amount of occlusal adjustment after 6 months of clinical use. Adv Appl Ceram. 2018/11/17; 117(8):445–451. DOI:10.1080/17436753.2018.1477567.
23.
CuiX-Y, TongD, WangXZ, Comparison of the translucency and color masking effect of the zirconia ceramics made by milling and gel deposition. J Peking Univ (Health Sci). 2018;50(1):85.
24.
ZhangY, HanJ, GangZ, Fatigue behaviours of the zirconia dental restorations prepared by two manufacturing methods. Adv Appl Ceram. 2017;116(7):1–8. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2017.1336365
25.
UedaK, BeuerF, StimmelmayrM, Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(2):283. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5
26.
JiB, AlrayesAA, JingZ, Grinding and polishing efficiency of a novel self-glazed zirconia versus the conventional dry-pressed and sintered zirconia ceramics. Adv Appl Ceram. 2018;4:1–10.
