Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-8
The application of net-shape-formed self-glazed zirconia prostheses via a complete digital workflow in oral implant and restoration: A clinical case report
This clinical case report describes the application of net-shape-formed self-glazed zirconia prostheses via a complete digital workflow in oral implant and restoration. It demonstrates that by using a novel self-glazed zirconia, the commonly encountered clinical problem of porcelain chipping can be avoided, while the treatment quality and efficiency can be improved.
DuretF, PrestonJD.CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent. 1991;1:150–154.
2.
VanNR.The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater Off Pub Acad Dent Mater. 2012;28:3–12.
3.
LogozzoS, ZanettiEM, FranceschiniG, Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt & Laser Eng. 2014;54:203–221. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
4.
OrtorpA, KihlML, CarlssonGE.A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice. J Dent. 2009;37:731–736. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.002
LiuY, WangY, WangD, Self-glazed zirconia reducing the wear to tooth enamel. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2016;36(12):2889–2894. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.029
7.
RenW, DuF, ShenZ, The workflows of a novel self-glazed zirconia for dental prostheses fabrication: case reports.
8.
BoeddinghausM, BreloerES, RehmannP, Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:2027–2034. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1430-7
9.
MonacoC, EvangelistiE, ScottiR, A completely digital approach to replicate peri-implant soft tissue contours and emergence profile in the esthetic zone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:1511–1514. doi: 10.1111/clr.12599
10.
ScottiR, CardelliP, BaldissaraP, Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2011;98:445–447.
11.
ArcuriL, LorenziC, CecchettiF, Completely digital workflow for implant-prosthetic rehabilitations: a case report. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2016;8:114–121.
ArisanV, KarabudaZC, OzdemirT.Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol. 2010;81:43–51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090348
14.
PatelN.Integrating 3D digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141:20S–24S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0357
15.
SchererMD.Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning. Dent Clin North Am. 2014;58:561–595. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.04.002
16.
BencharitS, EdelmannAR, HosseiniB, Exploring effectiveness of computer-aided planning in implant positioning for a single immediate implant placement. J Oral Implant. 2016;42:233–239. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00054
17.
BorgonovoAE, RigaldoF, BattagliaD, Digital device in postextraction implantology: a clinical case presentation. Case Rep Dent. 2014;2014:1–6.
18.
MeloniSM, RiuGD, PisanoM, Implant restoration of Edentulous Jaws with 3D Software planning, Guided surgery, immediate loading, and CAD-CAM Completely Arch Frameworks. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2013/683423
19.
AiresI, BergerJ.Planning implant Placement on 3D Stereolithographic Models applied with immediate loading of implant-supported Hybrid prostheses after Multiple Extractions: A case Series. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2016;31:172–178.
20.
KamimuraE, TanakaS, TakabaM, In vivo evaluation of inter-operator reproducibility of digital dental and conventional impression techniques. Plos One. 2017;12(6):179–188.
