Bonding behaviours of a novel self-glazed zirconia dental material were investigated. The effect of a preformed porous nanoceramic bonding surface and the different cleansing methods on saliva-contaminated bonding surfaces was assessed in this in vitro study. Cleaning procedures commonly used in dental offices were tested. All specimens demonstrated adhesive fracture patterns except for airborne particle abrasion group, which resulted in mixed-type fracture pattern and the highest bonding force values. No statistically significant differences in bonding force values were found between self-glazed zirconia with and without a preformed porous nanoceramic bonding surface when bonded with the self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem 2). Scanning electron micrographs revealed no interaction between the bonding surface and the resin cement after priming. Mechanical retention is the predominant bonding mechanism between the bonding surface and the luting resin cement.
KocjanA, LogarM, ShenZ.The agglomeration, coalescence and sliding of nanoparticles, leading to the rapid sintering of zirconia nanoceramics. Sci Rep. 2017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02760-7
14.
KimMJ, KimYK, KimKH, Shear bond strengths of various luting cements to zirconia ceramic: surface chemical aspects. J Dent. 2011;39:795–803. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.012
15.
KolgeciL, MericskeE, WorniA, Technical complications and failures of zirconia-based prostheses supported by implants followed up to 7 years: a case series. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27:544–552. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3807
16.
WegnerSM, KernM.Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2:139–147.
17.
QuaasAC, YangB, KernM.Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater. 2007;23:506–512. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008
18.
YangB, ScharnbergM, WolfartS, Influence of contamination on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;81:283–290. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30664
19.
YangB, Lange-JansenHC, ScharnbergM, Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. Dent Mater. 2008;24:508–513. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.013
20.
NavazeshM.Methods for collecting saliva. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;694:72–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18343.x
21.
IshibeM, RaigrodskiA, FlinnB, Shear strengths of pressed and layered veneering ceramics to high-noble alloy and zirconia cores. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:29–37. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60090-5
22.
ValandroLF, Della BonaA, BottinoMA, The effect of ceramic surface treatment on bonding to densely sintered alumina ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.002
23.
FeitosaSA, PatelD, BorgesALS, Effect of cleaning methods on saliva-contaminated zirconia – an evaluation of resin bond durability. Oper Dent. 2015;40:163–171. doi: 10.2341/13-323-L
24.
AngkasithP, BurgessJO, BottinoMC, Cleaning methods for zirconia following salivary contamination. J Prosthodont. 2016;25:375–379. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12441
25.
NegreirosWM, AmbrosanoGMB, GianniniM.Effect of cleaning agent application and their combination on the bond strength of a resin cement to two yttrium-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal zirconia ceramics. Eur J Dent. 2017;11:6–11. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_276_16
26.
PharkJH, DuarteS, KahnH, Influence of contamination and cleaning on bond strength to modified zirconia. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1541–1550. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.007
