A Market Segmentation Approach to Nutrition Education among Low-Income Individuals

Abstract

Free nutrition education is available to most lowincome individuals including Food Stamp program participants, but few avail themselves of the opportunity. The primary objective of this study was audience segmentation based on perceived barriers to participation in free nutrition education (product, price, and place) among 3,659 low-income individuals in Oklahoma. Six market segments were identified through a cluster analysis of 12 perceived barriers. The market segments were: Few Barriers, Low Interest, Childcare, Know the Topic, Transportation, and Multiple Barriers. We conclude with an examination of the demographic composition of the market segments. Based on a judgment of their reachability and responsiveness, little effort should be expended to attempt to attract the Low Interest and Multiple Barriers segments, because the former is not interested in the product and the latter perceive too many impediments for engaging in the behavior. We recommend specific program changes to attract participation in nutrition education among the approximately twothirds of the population that comprise the Few Barriers, Childcare, Know the Topic, and Transportation segments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldwin

C. M.

Spiro

Levenson

M. R.

Cupertino

A. P.

(2001). Longitudinal findings from the normative aging study: III. Personality, individual health trajectories, and mortality. Psychology and Aging, 16, 450–465.

Alterman

A. I.

Mcdermott

P. A.

Cacciola

J. S.

Rutherford

M. J.

Boardman

C. R.

Mckay

J. R.

Cook

T. G.

(1998). A typology of antisociality in methadone patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 412–422.

Andreasen

A. R.

(1995). Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Anliker

Bell

Miller

Harkins

Gabor

Bartlett

(2000). Food Stamp Nutrition Education Study: Final report.Washington, DC: Health Systems Research.

Anliker

Bell

Miller

Matheson

(2000). Food Stamp Nutrition Education Study: Case study reports.Washington, DC: Health Systems Research.

Blashfield

R. K.

(1976). Mixture models of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 377–388.

Blashfield

R. K.

Morey

L. C.

(1980). A comparison of four clustering methods using MMPI Monte Carlo data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 57–64.

Brewer

V. R.

Moore

B. D.

Hissock

(1997). Learning disability subtypes in children with neurofibromatosis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 521–533.

Coreil

Bryant

C. A.

Henderson

J. N.

(2001). Social and behavioral foundations of public health.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

10.

Gorman-Smith

Tolan

P. H.

Henry

D. B.

Florsheim

(2000). Patterns of family functioning and adolescent outcomes among urban African American and Mexican American families. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 436–457.

11.

Grych

J. H.

Jouriles

E. N.

Mcdonald

Norwood

W. D.

Swank

P. R.

(2000). Patterns of adjustment among children of battered women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 84–94.

12.

Kotler

Roberto

Lee

(2002). Social marketing: Improving the quality of life (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Milligan

G. W.

(1980). An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 325–342.

14.

Morey

L. C.

Blashfield

R. K.

Skinner

H. A.

(1983). A comparison of cluster analysis techniques within a sequential validation framework. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 309–329.

15.

Overall

J. E.

Gibson

J. M.

Novy

D. M.

(1993). Population recovery capabilities of 35 cluster analysis methods. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 459–470.

16.

Overall

J. E.

Magee

K. N.

(1992). Replication as a rule for determining the number of clusters in hierarchical cluster analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 119–128.

17.

Rapkin

B. D.

Luke

(1993). Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 247–277.

18.

Siegel

Doner

(1998). Marketing public health: Strategies to promote social change.Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.

19.

Taylor

Fedoroff

I. C.

Koch

W. J.

Thordarson

D. S.

Fecteau

Nicki

R. M.

(2001). Posttraumatic stress disorder arising after road traffic collisions: Patterns of response to cognitive-behavior therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 541–551.

20.

U.S. Department Of Agriculture (Usda). (2004a). Food Stamp Program annual household participation. Retrieved 5/19/2004, from www.fns.usda.gov/pd/fsfyhh.htm.

21.

U.S. Department Of Agriculture (Usda). (2004b). Food Stamp Program annual persons participating. Retrieved 5/19/2004, from www.fns.usda.gov/pd/fsfypart.htm.

22.

Waller

N. G.

Kaiser

H. A.

Illian

J. B.

Manry

(1998). A comparison of the classification capabilities of the 1-dimensional Kohonen neural network with two partitioning and three hierarchical cluster analysis algorithms. Psychometrika, 63, 5–22.

23.

Ward

J. H.

(1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.

24.

Wennberg

Andersson

Bohmann

(2002). Psychosocial characteristics at age 10; differentiating between adult alcohol use pathways: A prospective longitudinal study. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 115–130.