To estimate the pitting rate of internally corroded oil and gas gathering pipelines, a multivariate regression modelling was carried out, using pitting rates and operating parameters. These operating parameters, temperature, pH, CO2 partial pressure, water cut, wall shear stress, chloride ion concentration, sulphate ion concentration, operating pressure, oil production rate, gas production rate and water production rate, were obtained from routine monitoring of the pipelines, whereas, the pitting rates (mean pit depths over time) were determined by the ultrasonic thickness measurement technique. The operating parameters and pitting rates were also used to estimate the pit depth growth of the pipelines using Monte Carlo simulation, and field data were used to test the developed models. The results obtained indicated that the pipelines under severe pitting corrosion rate were, more conservatively predicted than those under low, moderate and high pitting corrosion rates.
PapavinasamS.DoironA. and RevieR. W.: ‘Model to predict internal pitting corrosion of oil and gas pipelines’, Corrosion201066, (3), 035006(01)–035006(11). doi: 10.5006/1.3360912
2.
OssaiC. I.BoswellB. and DaviesI. J.: ‘Estimation of internal pit depth growth and reliability of aged oil and gas pipelines - a Monte Carlo simulation approach’, Corrosionin press2015, doi: 10.5006/1543
3.
OssaiC. I.BoswellB. and DaviesI. J.: ‘Predictive modelling of internal pitting corrosion of aged non-piggable pipelines’, J. Electrochem. Soc.2015162, (6), C251–C259. doi: 10.1149/2.0701506jes
4.
VelazquezJ. C.ValorA.CaleyoF.VenegasV.Espina-HernandezJ. H.HallenJ. M. and LopezM. R.: ‘Pitting corrosion models improve integrity management, reliability’, Oil Gas J.2009107, (28), 56–62.
5.
ZhangR.GopalM. and Jepson:W. P. ‘ Development of a mechanistic model for predicting corrosion rate in multiphase oil/water/gas flows’, NACE International Conference Series, Corrosion /97, paper 601, 1997.
6.
RivasD.CaleyoF.ValorA. and HallenJ. M.: ‘Extreme value analysis applied to pitting corrosion experiments in low carbon steel: Comparison of block maxima and peak over threshold approaches’, Corrosion Sci.200850, (3193), 3193–3204. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.002
7.
KishawyH. A. and GabbarA. H.: ‘Review of pipeline integrity management practices’, Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping201087373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.04.003
8.
OssaiC. I.: ‘Advances in asset management techniques: An overview of corrosion mechanisms and mitigation strategies for oil and gas pipelines’, ISRN Corros.Article ID 57014320121–10.
9.
De LeonD. and MacıasO. F.: ‘Effect of spatial correlation on the failure probability of pipelines under corrosion’, Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping200582123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.07.018
10.
RenpuW.: ‘ Chapter 11 - Oil and gas well corrosion and corrosion prevention, advanced well completion engineering’, 3rd edn617–700; 2011Waltham, MA Gulf Professional Publishing. Advanced well completion engineering, 3rd edn, 2010.
11.
ColeI. S.CorriganP.SimS. and BirbilisN.: ‘Corrosion of pipelines used for CO2 transport in CCS: Is it a real problem?’, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control20115749–756. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.05.010
12.
SongY.PalencsárA.SvenningsenG.KvarekvalJ. and HemmingsenT.: ‘Effect of O2 and temperature on sour corrosion’, Corrosion201268, (7), 662–671. doi: 10.5006/0341
13.
FangH.BrownB. and NesicS.: ‘Effects of sodium chloride concentration on mild steel corrosion in slightly sour environments’, Corrosion201167, (1), 015001-1–015001-12. doi: 10.5006/1.3546847
14.
SahraouiY.KhelifR. and ChateauneufA.: ‘A maintenance planning under imperfect inspections of corroded pipelines’, Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping201310476–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.01.009
15.
NesicS.: ‘Key issues related to modelling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines – A review’, Corros. Sci.2007494308–4338. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.06.006
16.
ChoiH. and Al-AjwadH.: ‘ Flow dependency of sweet and sour corrosion of L-80 carbon steel downhole production tubing in Khuff gas wells’, NACE International Conference Series, Corrosion /2007, NACE-08638, 2007.
17.
Hernandez-RodriguezM. A. L.Martínez-DelgadoD.GonzálezR.Pérez UnzuetaA.Mercado-SolísR. D. and RodríguezJ.: ‘Corrosive wear failure analysis in a natural gas pipeline’, Wear2007263567–571. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.123
18.
TaylorC. D.: ‘Corrosion informatics: An integrated approach to modelling corrosionCorros. Eng., Sci. Technol.2015. doi: 10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000012
19.
ObanijesuE. O.AkindejuM. K.VishnuP. and TadeM. O.: ‘ Modelling the natural gas pipeline internal corrosion rate resulting from hydrate formation’, in ‘Computer aided chemical engineering ’, (ed. PistikopoulosE. N.GeorgiadisM. C. and KokossisA. C.), Vol. 291160–1164; 2011Elsevier, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-54298-4.50011-8
20.
VitseF.Nešic´S.GunaltunY.Larrey de TorrebenD. and Duchet-SuchauxP.: ‘Mechanistic model for the prediction of top-of-the-line corrosion risk’, Corrosion200359, (12), 1075–1084. doi: 10.5006/1.3277527
21.
NingJ.ZhengY.BrownB.YoungD. and Nešic´S.: ‘A thermodynamic model for the prediction of mild steel corrosion products in an aqueous hydrogen sulfide environment’, Corrosion201571, (8), 945–960. doi: 10.5006/1566
22.
ValorA.CaleyoF.RivasD. and HallenJ. M.: ‘Stochastic approach to pitting-corrosion-extreme modelling in low-carbon steel’, Corros. Sci.201052, (3), 910–915. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.11.011
23.
TimashevS. A.MalyukovaM. G.PoluianL. V. and BushinskayaA. V.: ‘Markov description of corrosion defects growth and its application to reliability based inspection and maintenance of pipelines’, 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference, 525-533. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2008.
24.
ShekariE.KhanF. and AhmedS.: ‘A predictive approach to fitness-for-service assessment of pitting corrosion’, Int. J. Press. Vessels and Piping, Available online 9 May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.04.014.
25.
MarsagliaG. and MarsagliaJ.: ‘Evaluating the Anderson–Darling distribution’, J. Statis. Software20049, (2), 1–5.
AndersonT. W., & DarlingD. A.: ‘A test of goodness-of-fit’, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 49, (268), 765–769. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232
28.
OssaiC. I.: ‘Predictive modelling of Wellhead corrosion due to operating conditions: A field data approach’ISRN CorrosionArticle ID 23702520121–8.
29.
JepsonW. P.BhongaleS. and GopalM.: ‘ Predictive model for sweet corrosion in horizontal multiphase slug flow’, NACE International Conference series, Corrosion/96: paper 19, 1996.
30.
FajardoV.CantoC.BrownB. and NesicS.: ‘Effect of organic acids in CO2 corrosion’, NACE International Conference series, Corrosion/2007, paper no. 07319, 2007.
31.
WenJ.GuT. and NesicS.: ‘Investigation of the effects of fluid flow on SRB biofilm’, NACE International Corrosion Conference Series, Corrosion/2007, Paper. No. 07516, 2007.
32.
ShoesmithD. W.TaylorP.BaileyM. G. and OwenD. G.: ‘The Formation of Ferrous Monosulfide Polymorphs during the Corrosion of Iron by Aqueous Hydrogen Sulfide at 21°C’, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1980127, (5), 1007–1015. doi: 10.1149/1.2129808
33.
KochG.AyelloF.KhareV.SridharN.N. and MoosaviA.: ‘Corrosion threat assessment of crude oil flow lines using Bayesian network model’, Corros. Eng., Sci. Technol.201550, (3), 236–247. doi: 10.1179/1743278215Y.0000000005
34.
ZhangJ. and LounisZ.: ‘Sensitivity analysis of simplified diffusion-based corrosion initiation model of concrete structures exposed to chlorides’, Cem. Concrete Res.200636 (7), 1312–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.015
35.
HambyD. M.: ‘A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models’, Environ. Monit. Assess.199432, (2), 135–154. doi: 10.1007/BF00547132
36.
HoffmanF. O. and MillerC. W.: ‘ Uncertainties in environmental radiological assessment models and their implications’, Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 6-7, 1983.
37.
KatanoY.MiyataK.ShimizuH. and IsogaiT.: ‘Predictive model for pit growth on underground pipes’, Corrosion200359, (2), 155–161. doi: 10.5006/1.3277545
38.
CaleyoF.VelázquezJ. C.ValorA. and HallenJ. M.: ‘Probability distribution of pitting corrosion depth and rate in underground pipelines: A Monte Carlo study’, Corros. Sci.2009511925–1934. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.019
39.
ZhangS. and ZhouW.: ‘System reliability of corroding pipelines considering stochastic process-based models for defect growth and internal pressure’, Int. J. Press. Vess. Piping2013120111–112.
40.
BazanF. A. V. and BeckA. T.: ‘Stochastic process corrosion growth models for pipeline reliability’, Corros. Sci.201374, (50), 50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.011
41.
MohdM. H. and PaikJ. K.: ‘Investigation of the corrosion progress characteristics of offshore subsea oil well tubes’, Corros. Sci.201367130–141. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.10.008
42.
ErnstP. and NewmanR. C.: ‘Pit growth studies in stainless steel foils. II. Effect of temperature, chloride concentration and sulphate addition’, Corros. Sci.200244, (5), 943–954. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00134-2
43.
PapavinasamS.DoironA. and RevieR. W.: ‘Effect of surface layers on the initiation of internal pitting corrosion in oil and gas pipelines’, Corrosion200965 (10), 663. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/223126250
44.
CuiY.LanH. Q.KangZ. L.HeR. Y.HuangH. and LinN.: ‘Updated CO2/H2S internal corrosion model of natural gas pipelines based on flow field calculations’, Corros. Eng., Sci. Technol.201449, (1), 39–44. doi: 10.1179/1743278213Y.0000000102
45.
NACE standard RP0775: ‘ Preparation, installation, analysis and interpretation of corrosion coupons in oilfield operations’2005Houston, TX, USANACE international.
46.
OssaiC. I.BoswellB. and DaviesI. J.: ‘Pipeline failures in corrosive environments–A conceptual analysis of trends and effects’, Eng. Fail. Anal.20155336–58. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.004
