In this study, graphene nanoplatelet (GNP) fillers were first mixed with a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) aqueous solution under ultrasonication, and then glycerol was added as a plasticiser to enhance the thermal processability of the PVA/GNP mixture. The interactions among glycerol, GNP and PVA, rheological behaviour, crystallisation behaviour, electrical properties, and mechanical properties of the 3D printed parts were carefully investigated. The results show that the incorporation of glycerol can effectively decrease the melting temperature of PVA, thus improving the thermal FFF processability of the PVA/GNP nanocomposite. Besides, compared with the glycerol modified PVA (mPVA), the electrical conductivity of the mPVA/GNP nanocomposite 3D printed part with only 1.0 wt-% GNP loading could increase by ∼300 times (from 7.8 × 10−7 S m−1 to 2.4 × 10−4 S m−1). The obtained functional mPVA/GNP nanocomposite filaments were successfully used in fabrication of various 3D printed functional parts with complex geometry/structure and good dimensional accuracy.
YoussefA, HollisterSJ, DaltonPD.Additive manufacturing of polymer melts for implantable medical devices and scaffolds. Biofabrication. 2017; 9: 012002. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa5766.
3.
SalentijnGIJ, OomenPE, GrajewskiM, Fused deposition modeling 3D printing for (bio)analytical device fabrication: procedures, materials, and applications. Anal Chem. 2017; 89: 7053–7061. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00828.
4.
UriondoA, Esperon-MiguezM, PerinpanayagamS.The present and future of additive manufacturing in the aerospace sector: a review of important aspects. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2015; 229: 2132–2147. DOI: 10.1177/0954410014568797.
5.
ZhuC, LiuT, QianF, 3D printed functional nanomaterials for electrochemical energy storage. Nano Today. 2017; 15: 107–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2017.06.007.
6.
MaalderinkHHH, BruningFBJ, de SchipperMMR, 3D printed structural electronics: embedding and connecting electronic components into freeform electronic devices. Plast, Rubber Compos. 2018; 47: 35–41. DOI: 10.1080/14658011.2017.1418165.
7.
GodoiFC, PrakashS, BhandariBR.3d printing technologies applied for food design: status and prospects. J Food Eng. 2016; 179: 44–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.025.
8.
BakshiK, MulayA.A review on selective laser sintering: a rapid prototyping technology. IOSR J Mech Civ Eng (IOSRJMCE). 2016; 04: 53–57. DOI: 10.9790/1684-15008040453-57.
9.
PetersonAM.Review of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene in fused filament fabrication: a plastics engineering-focused perspective. Addit Manuf. 2019; 27: 363–371. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.030.
10.
PanY, ChenY.Meniscus process optimization for smooth surface fabrication in stereolithography. Addit Manuf. 2016; 12: 321–333. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.004.
LigonSC, LiskaR, StampflJ, Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017; 117: 10212–10290. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074.
13.
LeeJ-Y, AnJ, ChuaCK.Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today. 2017; 7: 120–133. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004.
14.
WangX, JiangM, ZhouZ, 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2017; 110: 442–458. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034.
15.
SchirmeisterCG, HeesT, LichtEH, 3D printing of high density polyethylene by fused filament fabrication. Additive Manufacturing. 2019; 28: 152–159. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.003.
16.
LimM, KwonH, KimD, Highly-enhanced water resistant and oxygen barrier properties of cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol) hybrid films for packaging applications. Prog Org Coat. 2015; 85: 68–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.03.005.
17.
LiuP, ChenW, BaiS, Facile preparation of poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide nanocomposites and their foaming behavior in supercritical carbon dioxide. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.032
18.
BendtsenST, QuinnellSP, WeiM.Development of a novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017; 105: 1457–1468. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36036.
19.
ChahalS, HussainFSJ, KumarA, Fabrication, characterization and in vitro biocompatibility of electrospun hydroxyethyl cellulose/poly (vinyl) alcohol nanofibrous composite biomaterial for bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng Sci. 2016; 144: 17–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.12.030.
20.
AlvaradoN, RomeroJ, TorresA, Supercritical impregnation of thymol in poly(lactic acid) filled with electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol)-cellulose nanocrystals nanofibers: development an active food packaging material. J Food Eng. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.08.008
21.
WangX, YueT, LeeTC.Development of Pleurocidin-poly(vinyl alcohol) electrospun antimicrobial nanofibers to retain antimicrobial activity in food system application. Food Control. 2015; 54: 150–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.001.
22.
ThongCC, TeoDCL, NgCK.Application of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in cement-based composite materials: a review of its engineering properties and microstructure behavior. Constr Build Mater. 2016; 107: 172–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.188.
JaiturongP, SirithunyalugB, EitsayeamS, Preparation of glutinous rice starch/polyvinyl alcohol copolymer electrospun fibers for using as a drug delivery carrier. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2017; 13: 45–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2017.08.008.
25.
YanE, CaoM, WangY, Gold nanorods contained polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan nanofiber matrix for cell imaging and drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016; 58: 1090–1097. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.080.
26.
GangC, NingC, LiL, Ionic liquid modified poly (vinyl alcohol) with improved thermal processability and excellent electrical conductivity. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2018; 57: acs.iecr.8b00157. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00157.
27.
HarpazD, AxelrodT, YitianA, Dissolvable polyvinyl-alcohol film, a time-barrier to modulate sample flow in a 3D-printed holder for capillary flow paper diagnostics. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12: 343. DOI: 10.3390/ma12030343.
28.
BalandinAA, GhoshS, BaoW, Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 2008; 8: 902–907. DOI: 10.1021/nl0731872.
29.
KimH, MiuraY, MacoskoCW.Graphene/polyurethane nanocomposites for improved gas barrier and electrical conductivity. Chem Mater. 2010; 22: 3441–3450. DOI: 10.1021/cm100477v.
30.
DulS, FambriL, PegorettiA.Fused deposition modelling with ABS–graphene nanocomposites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2016; 85: 181–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.013.
31.
SinghR, SandhuGS, PennaR, Investigations for thermal and electrical conductivity of ABS-graphene blended prototypes. Materials (Basel). 2017; 10: 881. DOI: 10.3390/ma10080881.
32.
PrashanthaK, RogerF.Multifunctional properties of 3D printed poly(lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. J Macromol Sci: A - Chem. 2017; 54: 24–29. DOI: 10.1080/10601325.2017.1250311.
33.
ZhuD, RenY, LiaoG, Thermal and mechanical properties of polyamide 12/graphene nanoplatelets nanocomposites and parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017; 134: 45332. DOI: 10.1002/app.45332.
34.
WangWY, JieZ, JinRW, Incorporation of graphitic nano-filler and poly(lactic acid) in fused deposition modeling. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017; 134. DOI: 10.1002/app.44703.
35.
MuQ, WangL, DunnCK, Digital light processing 3D printing of conductive complex structures. Addit Manuf. 2017; 18: 74–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.011.
36.
JakusAE, SecorEB, RutzAL, Three-dimensional printing of high-content graphene scaffolds for electronic and biomedical applications. ACS Nano. 2015; 9: 4636–4648. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01179.
LeonACD, RodierBJ, BajamundiC, Plastic metal-free electric motor by 3D printing of graphene-polyamide powder. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2018; 1: 1726–1733. DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00240.
39.
WuT, GrayE, ChenB.A self-healing, adaptive and conductive polymer composite ink for 3D printing of gas sensors. J Mater Chem C. 2018; 6: 6200–6207. DOI: 10.1039/c8tc01092g.
40.
ZhangD, ChiB, LiB, Fabrication of highly conductive graphene flexible circuits by 3D printing. Synth Met. 2016; 217: 79–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.03.014.
41.
ChizariK, DaoudMA, RavindranAR, 3D printing of highly conductive nanocomposites for the functional optimization of liquid sensors. Small. 2016; 12: 6076–6082. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201601695.
42.
CzyżewskiJ, BurzyńskiP, GawełK, Rapid prototyping of electrically conductive components using 3D printing technology. J Mater Process Technol. 2009; 209: 5281–5285. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.015.
43.
KwokSW, GohKHH, TanZD, Electrically conductive filament for 3D-printed circuits and sensors. Applied Materials Today. 2017; 9: 167–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.07.001.
44.
SalehpourS, RafieianF, JonoobiM, Effects of molding temperature, pressure and time on polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposites properties produced by freeze drying technique. Ind Crops Prod. 2018; 121: 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.079.
45.
WuJ, NingC, QiW.Preparation of novel thermoplastic poly(vinyl alcohol) with improved processability for fused deposition modeling. Polym Adv Technol. 2018; 29: 1447–1455. DOI: 10.1002/pat.4256.
46.
LeiJ, ShenXP, WuJL, Preparation and characterization of graphene/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2010; 118: 275–279. DOI: 10.1002/app.32278.
47.
RicciardiR, AuriemmaF, De RosaC, X-ray diffraction analysis of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels, obtained by freezing and thawing techniques. Macromolecules. 2004; 37: 1921–1927. DOI: 10.1021/ma035663q.
48.
LiangJ, HuangY, ZhangL, Molecular-Level dispersion of graphene into poly(vinyl alcohol) and effective reinforcement of their nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater. 2009; 19: 2297–2302. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200801776.
AchabyME, ArrakhizFE, VaudreuilS, Mechanical, thermal, and rheological properties of graphene-based polypropylene nanocomposites prepared by melt mixing. Polym Compos. 2012; 33: 733–744. DOI: 10.1002/pc.22198.
52.
SabziM, JiangL, LiuF, Graphene nanoplatelets as poly(lactic acid) modifier: linear rheological behavior and electrical conductivity. J Mater Chem A. 2013; 1: 8253–8261. DOI: 10.1039/C3TA11021D.
53.
FilipponeG, LunaMSD, AciernoD, Elasticity and structure of weak graphite nanoplatelet (GNP) networks in polymer matrices through viscoelastic analyses. Polymer (Guildf). 2012; 53: 2699–2704. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.04.037.
54.
TianX, LiuT, YangC, Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2016; 88: 198–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032.
55.
AbbottAC, TandonGP, BradfordRL, Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication. Additive Manufacturing. 2018; 19: 29–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.002.
56.
GaoX, QiS, KuangX, Fused filament fabrication of polymer materials: A review of interlayer bond. Additive Manufacturing. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101658
57.
WangS, CapoenL, D'hoogeDR, Can the melt flow index be used to predict the success of fused deposition modelling of commercial poly(lactic acid) filaments into 3D printed materials?Plast, Rubber Compos. 2018; 47: 9–16. DOI: 10.1080/14658011.2017.1397308.
58.
BaeJS, LeeDW, LeeYJ, Production of the glycerol-impregnated hybrid coal and its characterization. Fuel. 2014; 118: 33–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.022.
