Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Revolutionizing metal 3D printing with fabrication of copper components via metal fused filament fabrication: A study on the effect of shaping parameters
Material extrusion-type additive manufacturing (AM) is widely adopted due to its simplicity and accessibility. The use of metal–polymer composite filaments, followed by debinding and sintering, is emerging as a promising approach for metal AM. This three-stage process is acknowledged as metal fused filament fabrication (MFFF). While most existing research has focused on stainless steel-based systems, this study investigates the relatively underexplored area of copper-polymer composite filament processing. In this work, a copper-polymer composite filament was used to print (shape) the green parts. The influence of shaping parameters—print temperature, bed temperature, print speed, and fan speed—on dimensional accuracy and density was systematically studied. A central composite design was adopted for experimentation, followed by the analysis of variance and regression modeling. Results showed that all shaping parameters significantly affected part properties, with certain interaction effects being particularly dominant. Multiobjective optimization by ratio analysis method was applied to identify optimal conditions, representing a novel contribution for copper MFFF. Based on the best parameters, successful green part was achieved. Subsequently, debinding and sintering operations were performed, resulting in a dense copper-rich part. The final part exhibited anisotropic shrinkage and geometric deviations, highlighting the importance of understanding material-specific behaviors. This study offers key insights into optimizing copper MFFF for reliable and high-quality part production.
YadavPSahaiASharmaRS. Strength and surface characteristics of FDM-based 3D printed PLA parts for multiple infill design patterns. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series C2021; 102: 197–207.
2.
QuartoMCarminatiMD’UrsoG, et al.Processability of metal-filament through polymer FDM machine. ESAFORM2021; 2021: 2114/1–2114/11.
3.
ChenZLiZLiJ, et al.3D printing of ceramics: a review. J Eur Ceram Soc2019; 39: 661–687.
4.
JohnPKommaVRBhoreSP. 4D printing—a smart way of 3D printing: a brief review. In: Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, pp. 25–34.
5.
Gonzalez-GutierrezJCanoSSchuschniggS, et al.Additive manufacturing of metallic and ceramic components by the material extrusion of highly-filled polymers: a review and future perspectives. Materials (Basel)2018; 11: 840.
6.
DejeneNDLemuHG. Current status and challenges of powder bed fusion-based metal additive manufacturing: literature review. Metals (Basel)2023; 13: 424.
7.
ChowdhurySYadaiahNPrakashC, et al.Laser powder bed fusion: a state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties & defects, and numerical modelling. J Mater Res Technol2022; 20: 2109–2172.
8.
SantamariaRSalasiMBakhtiariS, et al.Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of 316L stainless steel produced using sinter-based extrusion additive manufacturing. J Mater Sci2022; 57: 9646–9662.
9.
JohnPKommaVRBhoreSP. Development of MATLAB code for tool path data extraction from the G code of the fused filament fabrication (FFF) parts. Engineering Research Express2023; 5: 025018.
10.
SadafMBragagliaMNanniF. A simple route for additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel via fused filament fabrication. J Manuf Process2021; 67: 141–150.
11.
KuroseTAbeYSantosMVA, et al.Influence of the layer directions on the properties of 316L stainless steel parts fabricated through fused deposition of metals. Materials (Basel)2020; 13: 2493.
12.
TostoCMianiFCicalaG. The impact of fused filament fabrication (FFF) printing profiles on 17-4 PH green and sintered parts. Macromol Symp2023; 411: 2200133.
13.
WangCMaiWShiQ, et al.Effect of printing parameters on mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy of 316L stainless steel fabricated by fused filament fabrication. J Mater Eng Perform2024; 33: 11781–11793.
14.
DamonJDietrichSGorantlaS, et al.Process porosity and mechanical performance of fused filament fabricated 316L stainless steel. Rapid Prototyp J2019; 25: 1319–1327.
15.
QuartoMCarminatiMD’UrsoG. Density and shrinkage evaluation of AISI 316L parts printed via FDM process. Mater Manuf Processes2021; 36: 1535–1543.
16.
GodecDCanoSHolzerC, et al.Optimization of the 3D printing parameters for tensile properties of specimens produced by fused filament fabrication of 17-4PH stainless steel. Materials (Basel)2020; 13: 774.
17.
ThompsonYGonzalez-GutierrezJKuklaC, et al.Fused filament fabrication, debinding and sintering as a low cost additive manufacturing method of 316L stainless steel. Addit Manuf2019; 30: 100861.
18.
CamineroMÁRomero GutiérrezAChacónJM, et al.Effects of fused filament fabrication parameters on the manufacturing of 316L stainless-steel components: geometric and mechanical properties. Rapid Prototyp J2022; 28: 2004–2026.
19.
SpillerSKolstadSORazaviN. Fabrication and characterization of 316L stainless steel components printed with material extrusion additive manufacturing. Procedia Structural Integrity2022; 42: 1239–1248.
20.
MartignoniLVegroACandidoriS, et al.Prototyping and characterisation of 316L stainless steel parts and lattice structures printed via metal fused filament fabrication. Rapid Prototyp J2024; 30: 123–141.
21.
PanQWangCMaiW, et al.Effect of support design on fabrication accuracy of 316L stainless steel components by extruding composite filaments with metal-filled powders. Composites Communications2025; 55: 1–12.
22.
ZhangZFemi-OyetoroJFidanI, et al.Prediction of dimensional changes of low-cost metal material extrusion fabricated parts using machine learning techniques. Metals (Basel)2021; 11: 690.
23.
TostoCTirillòJSarasiniF, et al.Hybrid metal/polymer filaments for fused filament fabrication (FFF) to print metal parts. Appl Sci2021; 11: 1444.
24.
Montes-RamirezJELopezAHassanMS, et al.Shrinkage and deformation compensation in metal fused filament fabrication (MF3) sintered copper components using 3d scanning and inverse deformation. J Manuf Process2024; 121: 9–19.
25.
Dehdari EbrahimiNJuYS. Thermal conductivity of sintered copper samples prepared using 3D printing-compatible polymer composite filaments. Addit Manuf2018; 24: 479–485.
26.
SaleaAPrathumwanRJunphaJ, et al.Metal oxide semiconductor 3D printing: preparation of copper(ii) oxide by fused deposition modelling for multi-functional semiconducting applications. J Mater Chem C Mater2017; 5: 4614–4620.
27.
Buj-CorralISivatte-AdroerM. An experimental investigation about the dimensional accuracy and the porosity of copper-filled PLA fused filament fabrication parts. Metals (Basel)2023; 13: 1608.
28.
MoritzerEElsnerCL. Investigation and improvement of processing parameters of a copper-filled polymer filament in fused filament fabrication as a basis for the fabrication of low-porosity metal parts. Macromol Symp2022; 404: 2100390.
29.
SchüßlerPFrankeJCzinkS, et al.Characterization of the metal fused filament fabrication process for manufacturing of pure copper inductors. Materials (Basel)2023; 16: 6678.
30.
RenLZhouXSongZ, et al.Process parameter optimization of extrusion-based 3D metal printing utilizing PW-LDPE-SA binder system. Materials (Basel)2017; 10: 305.
31.
AruannoBPaoliARazionaleAV, et al.Effect of printing parameters on extrusion-based additive manufacturing using highly filled CuSn12 filament. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 128: 1101–1114.
32.
GaoGXuFXuJ, et al.A survey of the influence of process parameters on mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts. Micromachines (Basel)2022; 13: 553.
33.
Rashidi MehrabadiNPircheraghiGGhasemkhaniA, et al.A review on material extrusion additive manufacturing of polycarbonate-based blends and composites: process-structure–property relationships. SPE Polymers2025; 6: e10174.
34.
NyiranzeyimanaGMutuaJMMoseBR, et al.Optimization of process parameters in fused deposition modelling of thermoplastics: a review. Materwiss Werksttech2021; 52: 682–694.
35.
GaoXQiSKuangX, et al.Fused filament fabrication of polymer materials: a review of interlayer bond. Additive Manufacturing2021; 37: 1–15.
36.
Pérez-DomínguezLRodríguez-PicónLAAlvarado-IniestaA, et al.MOORA under Pythagorean fuzzy set for multiple criteria decision making. Complexity2018; 2018: 2602376.
BrauersWKZavadskasEK. The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control Cybern2006; 35: 445–469.
40.
SchneiderCARasbandWSEliceiriKW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods2012; 9: 671–675.
41.
DimitriCMohamedSThierryB, et al.Influence of particle-size distribution and temperature on the rheological properties of highly concentrated Inconel feedstock alloy 718. Powder Technol2017; 322: 273–289.
42.
RaneKStranoM. A comprehensive review of extrusion-based additive manufacturing processes for rapid production of metallic and ceramic parts. Adv Manuf2019; 7: 155–173.
43.
KervranMVagnerCCochezM, et al.Thermal degradation of polylactic acid (PLA)/polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) blends: a systematic review. Polym Degrad Stab2022; 201: 1–17.
44.
BerrettaSDaviesRShyngYT, et al.Fused deposition modelling of high temperature polymers: exploring CNT PEEK composites. Polym Test2017; 63: 251–262.
45.
DingSNgBFShangX, et al.The characteristics and formation mechanisms of emissions from thermal decomposition of 3D printer polymer filaments. Sci Total Environ2019; 692: 984–994.
46.
JayaraghulTKKarthikKYaswanthA, et al.Nozzle flow characteristics of P.E.E.K (poly-ether ether ketone) material used in 3D-printing. Mater Today Proc. 2021; 44: 2963–2967.
47.
SinghTKBirruAKSinghKN. Optimizing the printing parameters for dimensional accuracy of distal femur bone by using Taguchi’s method. J Eng Appl Sci2024; 71: 10.
48.
FrunzaverdeDCojocaruVCiubotariuC-R, et al.The influence of the printing temperature and the filament color on the dimensional accuracy, tensile strength, and friction performance of FFF-printed PLA specimens. Polymers (Basel)2022; 14: 1978.
49.
BaraheniMShabgardMRTabatabaeeAM. Effects of FDM 3D printing parameters on PLA biomaterial components dimensional accuracy and surface quality. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2024; 238: 3864–3873.
50.
KuznetsovVESoloninANTavitovA, et al.Increasing strength of FFF three-dimensional printed parts by influencing on temperature-related parameters of the process. Rapid Prototyp J2020; 26: 107–121.
51.
WangPZouBXiaoH, et al.Effects of printing parameters of fused deposition modeling on mechanical properties, surface quality, and microstructure of PEEK. J Mater Process Technol2019; 271: 62–74.
52.
TaoYKongFLiZ, et al.A review on voids of 3D printed parts by fused filament fabrication. J Mater Res Technol2021; 15: 4860–4879.
53.
AhmadAAbbasAHussainG, et al.Performance evaluation of 3D printed polymer heat exchangers: influence of printing temperature, printing speed and wall thickness with consideration of surface roughness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2023; 128: 3627–3647.
54.
SpoerkMArbeiterFCajnerH, et al.Parametric optimization of intra- and inter-layer strengths in parts produced by extrusion-based additive manufacturing of poly(lactic acid). J Appl Polym Sci2017; 134: 45401.
55.
AbbottACTandonGPBradfordRL, et al.Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf2018; 19: 29–38.
56.
JayashuriyaMGautamSAravinthAN, et al.Studies on the effect of part geometry and process parameter on the dimensional deviation of additive manufactured part using ABS material. Progress in Additive Manufacturing2022; 7: 1183–1193.
57.
PellegriniALavecchiaFGuerraMG. Additive manufacturing of copper parts using extrusion and sinter-based technology: evaluation of the influence of printing parameters and debinding method. Rapid Prototyp J2024; 30: 1451–1461.
58.
SinghGMissiaenJMBouvardD, et al.Copper additive manufacturing using MIM feedstock: adjustment of printing, debinding, and sintering parameters for processing dense and defectless parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2021; 115: 449–462.
59.
SinghPBallaVKGokceA, et al.Additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy by metal fused filament fabrication (MF3): producing parts comparable to that of metal injection molding. Progress in Additive Manufacturing2021; 6: 593–606.
60.
AbeYKuroseTSantosM, et al.Effect of layer directions on internal structures and tensile properties of 17-4PH stainless steel parts fabricated by fused deposition of metals. Materials (Basel)2021; 14: 243.
61.
OttJBurghardtABritzD, et al.Influence of porosity and impurities on the thermal conductivity of pressure-less sintered cu powder green bodies. Powder Metall2021; 64: 85–96.
62.
EshkabilovSAraISevostianovI, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of stainless steel parts, manufactured by various technologies, in relation to their microstructure. Int J Eng Sci2021; 159: 103398.
63.
RaabSJGuschlbauerRLodesMA, et al.Thermal and electrical conductivity of 99.9% pure copper processed via selective electron beam melting. Adv Eng Mater2016; 18: 1661–1666.
64.
ObadimuSOKourousisKI. Shrinkage behaviour of material extrusion steel 316L: influence of primary 3D printing parameters. Rapid Prototyp J2022; 28: 92–101.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
