The present paper aims to predict the bearing stress at failures of woven fabric kenaf fibre reinforced polymer with single-lap hybrid joints under quasi-static testing. Testing series investigated includes a variation of joint types, normalised W/d, lay-up types, plate thickness and bolt loads. Initially, cohesive failures appeared within adhesive layer, followed by net-tension failure mode in all testing series investigated associated with stress concentration. Strength prediction was carried out subsequently by implementing XFEM framework with an embedded traction-separation relationship within ABAQUS CAE. The experimental datasets and XFEM results were evaluated where good agreements were found in the combination of cross ply and thicker coupon with a discrepancy of less than 5%.
BelmonteHMS.Notched strength of woven fabric composites [Ph.D. thesis]. UK: University of Surrey; 2002.
4.
Hoang-NgocCT, ParoissienE.Simulation of single-lap bonded and hybrid (bolted/bonded) joints with flexible adhesive. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2010;30(3):117–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.12.002
5.
KimJS, LimJY, LeeWG.Joining performance evaluation of different types of GEP224 glass/epoxy-to-AZ31B magnesium alloy single-lap joints. Int J Prec Eng Manuf. 2015;16(6):1135–1140. doi: 10.1007/s12541-015-0147-5
6.
BodjonaK, LessardL.Hybrid bonded-fastened joints and their application in composite structures: a general review. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2016;35(9):764–781. doi: 10.1177/0731684415627296
7.
MarannanoG, ZuccarelloB.Numerical experimental analysis of hybrid double lap aluminum-CFRP joints. Composites Part B: Eng. 2015;71:28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.025
8.
KellyG.Load transfer in hybrid (bonded/bolted) composite single-lap joints. Compos Struct. 2005;69(1):35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.016
9.
SugimanS, AhmadH.Comparison of cohesive zone and continuum damage approach in predicting the static failure of adhesively bonded single lap joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31(5):552–570. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2016.1222048
10.
AhmadH, CrocombeAD, SmithPA.Strength prediction in CFRP woven laminate bolted single-lap joints under quasi-static loading using XFEM. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2014;66:82–93. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.07.013
11.
JokinenJ, WallinM, SaarelaO.Applicability of VCCT in mode I loading of yielding adhesively bonded joints—a case study. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2015;62:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.07.004
SalmanSD, SharbaMJ, LemanZ, Physical, mechanical, and morphological properties of woven kenaf/polymer composites produced using a vacuum infusion technique. Int J Polym Sci. 2015. doi:10.1155/2015/894565.
14.
HamdanA, MustaphaF, AhmadKA, The effect of customized woven and stacked layer orientation on tensile and flexural properties of woven kenaf fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Polym Sci. 2016: 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2016/6514041
15.
ASTM standard D 3039/D 3039M. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials; 2008.
16.
AhmadH.Finite element-based strength prediction for notched and mechanically fastened woven fabric composites [Ph.D.thesis]. UK: University of Surrey; 2012.
17.
ASTM standard E399-90. Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials; 2002.
18.
TanlakN, SonmezFO, TalayE.Detailed and simplified models of bolted joints under impact loading. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2011;46(3):213–225. doi: 10.1177/0309324710396997
19.
AkkermanR.On the properties of quasi-isotropic laminates. Composites Part B: Eng. 2002;33(2):133–140. doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00002-1
20.
KellyG, HallströmS.Bearing strength of carbon fibre/epoxy laminates: effects of bolt-hole clearance. Composites Part B: Eng. 2004;35(4):331–343. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.001
21.
Di FrancoG, ZuccarelloB.Analysis and optimization of hybrid double lap aluminum-GFRP joints. Compos Struct. 2014;116:682–693. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.044
22.
OlmedoÁ, SantiusteC.On the prediction of bolted single-lap composite joints. Compos Struct. 2012;94(6):2110–2117. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.016
