Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is a printing technology that relies on remelting and modelling physical objects from thermoplastic filament materials. Natural fibres have been studied and used for polymeric reinforcement. Yet, there is limited information in the literature about reinforcing filament materials for FFF printing. This study aimed to evaluate some surface properties of FFF 3D printed polyamide 6 reinforced with kenaf fibres. Kenaf fibres were retted, bleached with sodium hypochlorite solution, and silanised with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane solution prior to thermally compounding with polyamide beads to produce filaments for experimental groups. A total of 55 specimens were printed by an FFF printer for 5 groups: control, 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5% and 1% kenaf fibres-reinforced polyamide (11 specimens for each group). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy analysis was conducted on the control and 1% kenaf-reinforced sample for chemical characterisation. The study groups were submitted to surface roughness, surface hardness and water contact angle measurement tests. The results showed no significant chemical change in the composite as a result of fibre incorporation. Surface hardness have shown a significant increase in their mean values after fibres incorporation, which were 93.3, 93.5, 92.2, 91.3 for 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 1% respectively compared with the control 88.9, while there was no significant difference in both surface roughness and surface hydrophilicity except for 1% kenaf-reinforced group (roughness = 358, contact angle = 55.1) compared to the control group (roughness = 216, contact angle = 46.4). Kenaf fibres reinforcement with polyamide 6 at concentrations not more than 0.5% has improved the surface hardness of the FFF printed material.
FengKCLiJWangL, et al.Combination of 3D printing and ALD for dentin fabrication from dental pulp stem cell culture. ACS Appl Bio Mater2021; 4: 7422–7430.
2.
IvanovskiSBreikOCarluccioD, et al.3D Printing for bone regeneration: challenges and opportunities for achieving predictability. Periodontol 20002023; 93: 358–384.
3.
JiangLZhaoYHeX, et al.Experimental research on the glass fiber-reinforced effect and mechanisms of sand powder 3D-printed rock-like materials. J Mater Res Technol2024; 33: 1971–1983.
4.
SungJChoiYSoH. Fabrication of functional surfaces using layer height method in material extrusion type 3D printing. J Mater Res Technol2024; 33: 749–757.
5.
AnadiotiEKaneBSoulasE. Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in restorative dentistry. Curr Oral Health Reports2018; 5: 133–139.
6.
AbduoJLyonsKBennamounM. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent2014; 2014: 783948.
7.
TahayeriMMMorganMFugolinAP, et al.3D Printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater2018; 34: 192–200.
8.
TartagliaGMMapelliAMasperoC, et al.Direct 3D printing of clear orthodontic aligners: current state and future possibilities. Materials (Basel).2021; 14: 1–11.
9.
LeeDLeeSYKimH, et al.A hybrid dental model concept utilizing fused deposition modeling and digital light processing 3D printing.Int J Prosthodont2020; 33: 229–231.
10.
HanXYangDYangC, et al.Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites based on 3D-printing technology for orthopedic and dental applications. J Clin Med2019; 8: 240.
11.
SpintzykSSchmunkRKraemer FernandezP, et al.3D printing of polyamide to fabricate a non-metal clasp removable partial denture via fused filament fabrication: a case report. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 8241.
12.
AciernoDPattiA. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) of thermoplastic-based filaments: process and rheological properties—an overview. Materials (Basel).2023; 16: 7664.
13.
GurralaPKRegallaSP. Part strength evolution with bonding between filaments in fused deposition modelling. Virtual Phys Prototyp2014; 9: 141–149.
14.
AlarifiIM. Mechanical properties and numerical simulation of FDM 3D printed PETG/carbon composite unit structures. J Mater Res Technol2023; 23: 656–669.
15.
Lal LazarPJSubramanianJNatarajanE, et al.Anisotropic structure-property relations of FDM printed short glass fiber reinforced polyamide TPMS structures under quasi-static compression. J Mater Res Technol2023; 24: 9562–9579.
16.
PatelKSShahDBJoshiSJ, et al.Effect of process parameters on the mechanical performance of FDM printed carbon fiber reinforced PETG. J Mater Res Technol2024; 30: 8006–8018.
17.
Al-kaabiAFJAbdullahJYJohariY, et al.Mechanical and morphological assessment of kenaf fibers- reinforced nylon for FDM 3D printing of dental prosthesis. Adv Mater Res2025; 4: 327–337.
18.
IsmailKIYapTCAhmedR. 3D-Printed fiber-reinforced polymer composites by fused deposition modelling (FDM): fiber length and fiber implementation techniques. Polymers (Basel).2022; 14: 4659.
19.
RijckaertSDaelemansLCardonL, et al.Continuous fiber-reinforced aramid/PETG 3D-Printed composites with high fiber loading through fused filament fabrication. Polymers (Basel).2022; 14: 298.
20.
Giwa IbrahimSKarimRSaariN, et al.Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) seed and its potential food applications: a review.J Food Sci2019; 84: 2015–2023.
21.
Abdul KhalilHPSYusraAFIBhatAH, et al.Cell wall ultrastructure, anatomy, lignin distribution, and chemical composition of Malaysian cultivated kenaf fiber. Ind Crops Prod2010; 31: 113–121.
22.
ArsadASuradiNLRahmatAR, et al.The influence of kenaf fiber as reinforcement on recycled polypropylene/recycled polyamide-6 composites. Int J last Technol2013; 17: 149–162.
23.
SimYYNyamKL. Hibiscus cannabinus L. (kenaf) studies: nutritional composition, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and potential applications. Food Chem2021; 344: 128582.
24.
KatiFA. The effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on flexural strength of self-polymerized resins: in vitro study. J Tech2022; 4: 45–49.
25.
AbduljabbarAAAbd katiFHaddadAI, et al.Evaluation of the effect of nano and micro hydroxyapatite particles on the impact strength of acrylic resin: in vitro study. J Tech2023; 5: 213–217.
26.
Khalid AzizH. The effect of nano hydroxyapatite on the bond strength of acrylic teeth repaired to an acrylic resin denture base using two types of auto polymerized acrylic resins. J Tech2023; 5: 225–233.
27.
JoshiSVDrzalLTMohantyAK, et al.Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites?Compos2004; 35: 371–376.
28.
SapiaiNJumahatAJawaidM, et al.Tensile and flexural properties of silica nanoparticles modified unidirectional kenaf and hybrid glass/kenaf epoxy composites. Polymers (Basel).2020; 12: 2733.
29.
PrabhudassJMPalanikumarKNatarajanE, et al.Enhanced thermal stability, mechanical properties and structural integrity of MWCNT filled bamboo/kenaf hybrid polymer nanocomposites. Mater (Basel, Switzerland)2022; 15: 506.
30.
HaryatiARazaliNPetrůM, et al.Effect of chemically treated kenaf fibre on mechanical and thermal properties of PLA composites prepared through fused deposition modeling (FDM). Polymers (Basel).2021; 13: 3299.
31.
SaffianHAYamaguchiMAriffinH, et al.Thermal, physical and mechanical properties of poly(butylene succinate)/kenaf core fibers composites reinforced with esterified lignin. Polymers (Basel)2021; 13: 2359.
32.
SilvaTSilveiraPRibeiroM, et al.Thermal and chemical characterization of kenaf fiber (Hibiscus cannabinus) reinforced epoxy matrix composites. Polymers2021; 13: 2016.
33.
SayeedMMASayemASMHaiderJ, et al.Assessing mechanical properties of jute, kenaf, and pineapple leaf fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites: experiment and modelling.. Polymers (Basel).2023; 15: 830.
Hazrol MD ZainudinSSMWahabESIlyasNIA, et al.Effect of kenaf fibre as reinforcing fillers in corn starch-based biocomposite film. Polymers2022; 14: 1590.
36.
AhmadMNIshakMRMohammad TahaM, et al.A review of natural fiber-based filaments for 3D printing: filament fabrication and characterization. Materials (Basel)2023; 16: 4052.
37.
de AlmeidaVHMJesusRMdSantanaGM, et al.The development of biocomposite filaments for 3D printing by utilizing a polylactic acid (PLA) polymer matrix reinforced with cocoa husk cellulose fibers. Polymers (Basel)2024; 16: 1757.
38.
BellehumeurCLiLSunQ, et al.Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the fused deposition modeling process. J Manuf Process2004; 6: 170–178.
39.
BinaljadmTM. Flexible denture: a literature review. Cureus2024; 16: e55425.
40.
AdediranAAAkinwandeAABalogunOA, et al.Mechanical and optimization studies of polypropylene hybrid biocomposites. Sci Rep2022; 12: 1–17.
41.
TongRChenGTianJ, et al.Highly transparent, weakly hydrophilic and biodegradable cellulose film for flexible electroluminescent devices. Carbohydr Polym2020; 227: 115366.
