Hemp fibre mat reinforced unsaturated polyester composites were fabricated using a conventional sheet moulding compound process. The influence of fibre and CaCO3 filler content on strength and stiffness of these hemp fibre reinforced sheet moulding compounds is reported and compared with data for chopped glass fibre reinforced sheet moulding compounds. In addition the influence of alkaline and silane treatments of the hemp fibres is evaluated. The experimental data are compared to modified versions of the Cox–Krenchel and Kelly–Tyson models, supplemented with parameters of composite porosity to improve the prediction of composite tensile properties. A good agreement was found between the modified models and experimental data for strength and stiffness. The results indicate that hemp fibre reinforced sheet moulding compounds are of interest for low cost engineering applications that require high stiffness to weight ratios.
StamboulisA., BaillieC. A. and PeijsT.: Composites Part A, 2001, 32A, (8), 1105–1115.
10.
PeijsT., GarkhailS., HeijenrathR., van den OeverM. and BosH.: Macromol Symp., 1998, 127, 193–203.
11.
OksmanK.: Appl. Compos. Mater., 2000, 7, 403–414.
12.
HapuarachchiT. D., RenG., HoggP. J. and PeijsT.: Appl. Compos. Mater., 2007, 14, (4), 251–264.
13.
WambuaP., IvensJ. and VerpoestI.: Compos. Set Technol, 2003, 63, (9), 1259–1264.
14.
ArbelaizA., FernandezB., CanteroG., Llano-PonteR., ValeaA. and MondragonI.: Composites Part A, 2005, 36A, (12), 1637–1644.
15.
van den HeuvelP. W. J., van der BruggenY. J. W. and PeijsT.: Composites Part A, 1996, 27A, (9), 855–859.
16.
VenderboschR. W., PeijsT., MeijerH. E. H. and LemstraP. L.: Composites Part A, 1996, 27A, (9), 895–905.
17.
van den OeverM. and PeijsT.: Composites Part A, 1998, 29, (3), 227–240.
18.
MadhukarM. S. and DrzalL. T.: J. Compos. Mater., 1991, 25, (8), 958–991.
19.
JosephK., MattosoL. H. C., ToledoR. D., ThomasS., de CarvalhoL. H., PothenL., KalaS. and JamesB.: Proc. ‘Natural polymers and agrofibers composites’, 159-201;2000, San Carlos, Embrapa.
20.
MishraS., MisraM., TripathyS. S., NayakS. K. and MohantyA. K.: Polym. Compos., 2002, 23, (2), 164–170.
KellyA. and TysonW. R.: J. Meek Phys. Solids, 1965, 13, 329–350.
39.
ThomasonJ. L. and GroenewoudW. M.: Composites Part A, 1996, 27A, (7), 555–565.
40.
ThomasonJ. L., VlugM. A., SchipperG. and KrikorH. G. L. T.: Composites Part A, 1996, 27A, (11), 1075–1084.
41.
GarkhailS. K., HeijenrathR. W. H. and PeijsT.: Appl. Compos. Mater., 2000, 7, (5-6), 351–372.
42.
MadsenB. and LilholtH.: Compos. Set Technol, 2003, 63, (9), 1265–1272.
43.
FuS. Y. and LaukeB.: Composites Set Technol, 1996, 56, (10), 1179–1190.
44.
MacKenzieJ. K.: Proc. Phys. Soc. B, 1950, B63, 2–11.
45.
ZafeiropoulosN. E., WilliamsD. R., BaillieC. A. and MattewsF. L.: Composites Part A, 2002, 33A, (8), 1083–1093.
46.
SreekalaM. S., KumaranM. G. and ThomasS.: J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1997, 66, (5), 821–835.
47.
BledzkiA. K. and GassanJ.: Prog. Polym. Set, 1999, 24, (2), 221–274.
48.
BaleyC., BusnelF., GrohensY. and SireO.: Composites Part A, 2006, 37A, (10), 1626–1637.
49.
BosH.: ‘The potential of flax fibres as reinforcement for composite materials’, PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2004.
50.
ThanoslipC., Cauchi-SavonaS., PeijsT. and PosyachindaS.: J. Biobased Mater. Bioenerg., 2007, 1, (1), 87–93.
