In recent years, extensive research has introduced novel ways of reinforcing orthodontic anchorage using a variety of devices temporarily anchored in bone (miniscrews). Currently, there are numerous manufacturers with different miniscrew designs on the market.
Aims
The aim of this paper is to discuss the key design features of different miniscrew systems on the market. Furthermore, to present clinical selection criteria of miniscrews in different settings taking into account the determinant factors.
Methods
Review of the literature was carried out using the following search methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The search was focused on studies published until January 2018.
Results
We studied each individual miniscrew from all the identified manufacturers in details. All the features were then summarised and presented as a clinical guideline for the selection of miniscrews.
Conclusions
In this article, we reviewed the development of miniscrews and outlined the general design features of miniscrews as well as specific design features of the current miniscrews in the market. Extensive research of the current products was carried out to help clinicians better understand the difference between the various designs of miniscrews that can be used.
AlharbiF, AlmuzianM, BearnD.2018. Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis. European J Orthod. Epub ahead of print.
2.
AntoszewskaJ, PapadopoulosMA, ParkHS, LudwigB.2009. Five-year experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: a retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 136:158e1–10. discussion 158–9.
3.
ChaimaneeP, SuzukiB, SuzukiEY. 2011. ‘Safe zones’ for miniscrew implant placement in different dentoskeletal patterns. Angle Orthod. 81:397–403.
4.
CornelisMA, SchefflerNR, De ClerckHJ, TullochJF, BehetsCN. 2007. Systematic review of the experimental use of temporary skeletal anchorage devices in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 131:S52–S58.
5.
CostaA, RaffainlM, MelsenB.1998.Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 13:201–209.
6.
CreekmoreTD, EklundMK. 1983. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Dent.17:266–269.
7.
CrismaniAG, BertlMH, CelarAG, BantleonHP, BurstoneCJ. 2010. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 137:108–113.
8.
GainsforthBL, HigleyLB. 1945. A study of orthodontic anchorage possibilities in basal bone. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 31:406–417.
9.
HiguchiKW, SlackJM. 1991. The use of titanium fixtures for intraoral anchorage to facilitate orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 6:338–344.
10.
HongSB, KusnotoB, KimEJ, BeGoleEA, HwangHS, LimHJ. 2016. Prognostic factors associated with the success rates of posterior orthodontic miniscrew implants: a subgroup meta-analysis. Korean J Orthod. 46:111–126.
11.
JambiS, WalshT, SandlerJ, BensonPE, SkeggsRM, O'BrienK.2014. Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 19(8):1–74.
12.
KadiogluO, BüyükyilmazT, ZachrissonBU, MainoBG. 2008. Contact damage to root surfaces of premolars touching miniscrews during orthodontic treatment2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 134:353–360.
13.
KanomiR.1997. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod.31:763–767.
14.
KravitzND, KusnotoB.2007. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 131:S43–S51.
15.
LeungMT, RabieAB, WongRW. 2008. Stability of connected mini-implants and miniplates for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod. 30:483–489.
16.
LinJC, LiouEJ, YehCL, EvansCA. 2007. A comparative evaluation of current orthodontic miniscrew systems. World J Orthod. 8:136–144.
17.
LiouEJ, PaiBC, LinJC. 2004. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 126:42–47.
LuziC, VernaC, MelsenB.2009. Guidelines for success in placement of orthodontic mini-implants. J Clin Orthod. 43:39–44.
20.
MahJ, BergstrandF.2005. Temporary anchorage devices: a status report. J Clin Orthod. 39:132–136.
21.
MelsenB, CostaA.2000. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res. 3:23–28.
22.
MiyawakiS, KoyamaI, InoueM, MishimaK, SugaharaT, Takano-YamamotoT.2003. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 124:373–8.
23.
OdmanJ, LekholmU, JemtT, ThilanderB.1991. Osseointegrated implants as orthodontic anchorage in the treatment of partially edentulous adult patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 6:338–44.
24.
OhashiE, PechoOE, MoronM, LagravereMO. 2006. Implant vs screw loading protocols in orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 76:721–727.
25.
PapageorgiouSN, ZogakisIP, PapadopoulosMA. 2012. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 142(5):577–595.
26.
PoggioPM, IncorvatiC, VeloS, CaranoA.2006. ‘Safe zones’: a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod. 76:191–197.
27.
PrabhuJ, CousleyRR. 2006. Current products and practice: bone anchorage devices in orthodontics. J Orthod. 33:288–307.
28.
ProffitWR. 2000. Biomechanics and mechanics (Section IV). In: Elsevier Health Sciences, editor. Contemporary orthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby; p. 308–311.
SchätzleM, MännchenR, ZwahlenM, LangNP. 2009. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 20:1351–1359.
31.
TrisiP, LazzaraR, RaoW, RebaudiA.2002. Bone-implant contact and bone quality: evaluation of expected and actual bone contact on machined and osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 22:535–545.
32.
WatanabeH, DeguchiT, HasegawaM, ItoM, KimS, Takano-YamamotoT.2013. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthod Craniofac Res.16:44–55.
33.
WiechmannD, MeyerU, BüchterA.2007. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 18:263–267.
34.
YanagitaT, KurodaS, Takano-YamamotoT, YamashiroT.2011. Class III malocclusion with complex problems of lateral open bite and severe crowding successfully treated with miniscrew anchorage and lingual orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 139:679–689.
