Prevalence of low back pain and sickness absence: A ``borderline'' study in Norway and Sweden

Abstract

Aims: Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem in both Norway and Sweden. The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of LBP and sickness absence due to LBP in two neighbouring regions in Norway and Sweden. The two areas have similar socioeconomic status, but differ in health benefit systems. Methods: A representative sample of 1,988 adults in Norway and 2,006 in Sweden completed questionnaires concerning LBP during 1999 and 2000. For this study only individuals in part or full time jobs, (n=1,158 in Norway and n=1,129 in Sweden) were included. Results: In Norway the lifetime prevalence was 60.7% and in Sweden 69.6%, the one-year prevalence was 40.5% and 47.2%, and the point prevalence 13.4% and 18.2% respectively. There was a significantly higher risk of reporting LBP in Sweden, even after controlling for gender, age, education, and physical workload. There was no difference in risk of self-certificated short-term sickness absence (1—3 days), but it was a 40% lower risk of sickness absence with medical sickness certification in Sweden compared with Norway. Conclusion: The prevalence of LBP was higher in the Swedish area than in the Norwegian. The risk of self-certificated sickness absence, however, showed no differences and the risk of medically certificated sickness absence was lower in the Swedish area. This contradiction might partly be explained by the economical ``disincentives'' in the Swedish health compensation system.

Keywords

Economic incentives geographical differences LBP low back pain musculoskeletal pain pain sickness absence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Deyo RA , Weinstein JN Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001;344:363—70.

Andersson GB Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet 1999;354:581—5.

Hansson T. , Hansson E. The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries. Spine 2000;25:3055—64.

Waddel G. , Aylward M. , Sawney P. Low back pain, incapacity for work and social security benefits: An international literature review and analysis. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2002.

National Insurance Administration, Folketrygden Nøkkeltall 2001 ( National Insurance Key Figures 2001), Statistics Report 01/2002. Oslo: National Insurance Administration; 2002.

Årsstatistikk — tidsserier [database online], Riksförsäkringsverket, 2002. Updated 6 March 2002. Available at: http://ww.rfv.se/stat/arsstat.

Nyman K. , Palmer E. , Bergendorff S. Den svenska sjukansjukfrånvaro I åtta länder. Report to ESO, Ds 2002:49. Stockholm: Swedish Government; 2002 (in Swedish). Available at: http://www.regeringen.se/eso (accessed 3 February 2003).

Statistikkbanken [database online]. Statistics Norway, updated weekly. Available at: http://www.3.ssb.no/Statistikkbanken/.

Statistikkdatabasen [database online]. Statistics Sweden, updated weekly. Available at: http://www.scb.se/databaser/makro/start.asp.

10.

Brage S. , Krohg M. , Klockars M. , et al. Trygdeordninger i Norden. Tidsskrift Norsk Laegefor 2002;122:1486—91 (in Norwegian).

11.

Leboeuf-Yde C. , Klougart N. , Lauritzen T. How common is low back pain in the Nordic population? Data from a recent study on a middle-aged general Danish population and four surveys previously conducted in the Nordic countries . Spine 1996;21:1518—25.

12.

Eriksen HR , Svendsrød R. , Ursin G. , et al. Prevalence of subjective health complaints in the Nordic European countries in 1993. Eur J Public Health 1998;8:1—5.

13.

Van Doorn JW Low back disability among self-employed dentists, veterinarians, physicians, and physical therapists in the Netherlands. Acta Orthop Scand 1995;66(Suppl):263.