Objective: The objectives of this paper are to provide an overview of recovery-focused models of care and discuss the implementation of the Strengths Model at St. Vincent's Mental Health Melbourne (SVMH), Victoria, Australia.
Conclusions: The implementation of the Strengths Model at SVMH is discussed with particular emphasis on the process of implementation, service implications, practical challenges and dilemmas that have arisen, and proposed evaluation. Recovery-focused care is feasible and can enhance current practice of mental health services.
HardingCM. Course types in schizophrenia: an analysis of European and American studies. Schizophrenia Bulletin1988; 14: 633–643.
2.
DeeganP. Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal1998; 11: 11–19.
3.
Victorian Government Department of Health and Community Services. Victoria's Mental Health Service Resources for Case Managers: Individual Service Planning. Melbourne: Victorian Government Department of Health and Community Services, 1996.
4.
AnthonyWALibermanRP. The practice of psychiatric rehabilitation: conceptual and research base. Schizophrenia Bulletin1986; 12: 542–559.
5.
MueserKTBondGR. Psychosocial treatment approaches for schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Psychiatry2000; 13: 27–35.
6.
LibermanRP. Psychiatric Rehabilitation of Chronic Mental Patients. American Psychiatric Press, Inc, Washington1988.
7.
RappCGoschaRC. The Strengths Model2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York2006.
MeyersonATSolomonP. New Developments in Psychiatric Rehabilitation. Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco1990.
10.
AnthonyW. A recovery-oriented service system: Setting some system level standards. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal2000; 24: 159–168.
11.
AnthonyWA. Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal1993; 16: 11–23.
12.
MueserKTMeyerPSPennDLClancyRClancyDMSalyersMP. The Illness Management and Recovery Program: rationale, development, and preliminary findings. Schizophrenia Bulletin2006; 32(Suppl. 1)S32–S43.
13.
AnthonyWACohenMRFarkasMCohenBF. Clinical care update: The chronically mentally ill. Case management – More than a response to a dysfunctional system. Community Mental Health Journal1988; 24: 219–228.
14.
MueserKTBondGRDrakeREResnickSG. Models of community care for severe mental illness: a review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin1998; 34: 37–74.
15.
GilbertMMillerKBerkLHoVCastleD. Scope for psychosocial treatments in psychosis: an overview of collaborative therapy. Australasian Psychiatry2003; 11: 220–224.
16.
CastleDGilbertM. Collaborative therapy: framework for mental health. British Journal of Psychiatry2006; 189: 467.
17.
BjorkmanTHanssonLSandlundM. Outcomes of case management based on the strengths model compared to standard care. A randomised controlled trial. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology2002; 37: 147–152.
18.
ModrcinMRappCPoertnerJ. The evaluation of case management services with the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning1988; 11: 307–314.
19.
MarciasCFarleyOWJacksonRKinneyR. Case management in the context of capitation financing: An evaluation of the strengths model. Administration and Policy in Mental Health1997; 24: 535–543.
20.
Australian Health Ministers. National Mental Health Plan 2003–2008Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Community Services, 2003.
21.
MeehanTJKingRJBeavisPHRobinsonD. Recovery-based practice: do we know what we mean or mean what we know?. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry2008; 42: 177–182.
22.
HardingCMBrooksGWAshikagaTStraussJSBreierA. The Vermont Longitudinal Study of patients with severe mental illness I: methodology, study sample and overall status 32 years later. American Journal of Psychiatry1987; 144: 718–726.
23.
ByrneMKDeaneFPLambertGCoombsT. Enhancing medication adherence: clinician outcomes from the Medication Alliance training program. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry2004; 38: 246–253.
