The evaluation of process performance within mining operations at Mehdiabad complex deposit, Central Iran, requires modelling the spatial variability of six cross-correlated grade variables: zinc (Zn) and lead (Pb) as the main products, silver (Ag) and copper (Cu) as byproducts, and iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) as contaminants. To this end, the variables are first transformed into spatially uncorrelated factors, using the minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors approach, then the factors are simulated directly at the target block support. The result is a set of realisations (equiprobable scenarios) of the grade distribution within the deposit, which reproduce the joint dependence relationships and natural variability at all spatial scales. This model can decrease the level of uncertainty in Mehdiabad project development and consequently in production.
AzariK, SethnaSF.1994. Geology and ore localization study of the zinc-lead sulphide deposit of Central Valley Mehdiabad-EH-Bahadoran. Proceeding of Fourth Mining Symposium of Iran; Sept 10–14; Yazd Province, Iran. Exploration, v. 1.
BaumgartnerR, DusciM, GressierJ, MaytaP.2011. Building a geometallurgical model for early-stage project development – a case study from the Canahuire epithermal Au-cu-Ag deposit, Southern Peru. In: Dominy S, editor. The First AUSIMM International Geometallurgy Conference. Melbourne: The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; p. 53–60.
BoucherA, DimitrakopoulosR.2012. Multivariate block-support simulation of the yandi iron ore deposit, Western Australia.Math Geosci. 44(4):449–468. doi: 10.1007/s11004-012-9402-9
De Freitas SilvaM, DimitrakopoulosR.2015. Simulation of weathered profiles coupled with multivariate block-support simulation of the Puma Nickel Laterite Deposit, Brazil. Les Cahiers du GERAD, G-2015-90, 1–24.
10.
DesbaratsAJ, DimitrakopoulosR.2000. Geostatistical simulation of regionalized pore-size distributions using min/max autocorrelation factors.Math Geol. 32(8):919–942. doi: 10.1023/A:1007570402430
11.
EmeryX, OrtizJM.2011. Two approaches to direct block-support conditional co-simulation.Comput Geosci. 37(8):1015–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.07.012
12.
GhazanfariF.1999. Zn–Pb mines and deposits in Iran. Unpublished Report.
13.
GhorbaniM.2013. The economic geology of Iran: mineral deposits and natural resources. New York (NY): Springer Science & Business Media.
GoovaertsP.1993. Spatial orthogonality of the principal components computed from coregionalized variables.Math Geol. 25(3):281–302. doi: 10.1007/BF00901420
16.
GoovaertsP.1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
17.
G.S.I.1998. Geological studies on the Mehdiabad Lead and Zinc Project. Unpublished report.
18.
HosseiniSA, AsghariO.2016. Multivariate geostatistical simulation of the Gole Gohar Iron Ore deposit, Iran.J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 116(5):423–430. doi: 10.17159/2411-9717/2016/v116n5a8
19.
IsaaksEH.1991. The application of Monte Carlo methods to the analysis of spatially correlated data. San Francisco: Stanford University.
LeuangthongO, DeutschCV.2003. Stepwise conditional transformation for simulation of multiple variables.Math Geol. 35(2):155–173. doi: 10.1023/A:1023235505120
22.
LishchukV.2016. Geometallurgical programs–critical evaluation of applied methods and techniques. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.
23.
LopesJA, RosasCF, FernandesJB, VanzelaGA.2011. Risk quantification in grade-tonnage curves and resource categorization in a lateritic nickel deposit using geologically constrained joint conditional simulation.J Min Sci. 47(2):166–176. doi: 10.1134/S1062739147020043
24.
MuellerUA, FerreiraJ.2012. The U-WEDGE transformation method for multivariate geostatistical simulation.Math Geosci. 44(4):427–448. doi: 10.1007/s11004-012-9384-7
25.
ReichertJ.2007. A metallogenetic model for carbonate-hosted non-sulphide zinc deposits based on observations of Mehdiabad and Irankuh, Central and Southwestern Iran. Halle (Saale): Universität Halle-Wittenberg.
26.
ReichertJ, BorgG, RashidiB.2003. Mineralogy of calamine ore from the Mehdiabad zinc–lead deposit, Central Iran. In: EliopoulosDG, editor. Mineral exploration and sustainable development. Rotterdam: Millpress; p. 97–100.
27.
RondonO.2012. Teaching aid: minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors for joint simulation of attributes.Math Geosci. 44(4):469–504. doi: 10.1007/s11004-011-9329-6
28.
RosenblattM.1956. Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function.Ann Math Stat. 27(3):832–837. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177728190
29.
da SilvaCZ.2013. A descorrelação de variáveis com fatorização MAF em estimativa de teores [MSc. Dissertação]. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
30.
Da SilvaCZ, CostaJF.2014. Minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors applied to grade estimation.Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 28(8):1929–1938. doi: 10.1007/s00477-014-0879-2
31.
SwitzerP, GreenAA.1984. Min/max autocorrelation factors for multivariate spatial imagery. Stanford (CA): Department of Statistics, Stanford University. Technical Report No. 6.
32.
TercanAE, SohrabianB.2013. Multivariate geostatistical simulation of coal quality data by independent components.Int J Coal Geol. 112:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.10.007
33.
Tolosana-DelgadoR, MuellerU, van den BoogaartKG, WardC, GutzmeJ.2015. Improving processing by adaption to conditional geostatistical simulation of block compositions.J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 115(1):13–26. doi: 10.17159/2411-9717/2015/v115n1a2
34.
TranT, MurphyM, GlackenI.2006. Semivariogram structures used in multivariate conditional simulation via minimum/maximum autocorrelation factors. In: Pirard E, Dassargues A, Havenith HB, editors. Proceedings XI International Congress, IAMG, Liège.
35.
Vargas-GuzmánJA.2004. Fast modeling of cross-covariances in the LMC: a tool for data integration.Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 18(2):91–99. doi: 10.1007/s00477-003-0131-y
36.
WackernagelH.2003. Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.
