Urban and Regional High Technologies: The Case of Oulu

Abstract

This paper investigates the reasons behind what has been termed the ‘Oulu Phenomenon‘ in Northern Finland. Over the past two to three decades the city of Oulu has transformed its economy from dependency on timber, paper and pulp industries into one based on High Technology, notably, telecommunications, biotechnology, electronics, multimedia and environmental technologies. In particular the paper will explore the role played by the national government via regional policy, higher education and the subsequent interaction between these, the local authorities and entrepreneurs

Keywords

High technology regional polic higher education path dependency anchor firms networking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahokangas

Hyry

Rasanen

(1999) Small technology based firms in fast growing regional clusters, New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2, pp. 19–26.

Ahokangas

Rasanen

(1998) Growth of small-technology-based firms: the Oulu phenomenon and parallel Nordic developments, in: Virtanen

(Ed) Proceedings of the Conference on the Growth and Job Creation in SMEs, 7–9 January (Finland: Mikkeli Polytechnic).

Batterbury

Hill

(2003) Assessing the impact of higher education on regional development: using a realist approach for better policies, in: Regional Studies Conference, 12–14 April (Pisa).

Bergman

Feser

(1999) Industrial and regional clusters: concepts and comparative applications, The Web Book of Regional Science (West Virginia University: Regional Research Institute).

Biocentre, University of Oulu (2003), Annual Report.

Breschi

Malerba

(2001) The geography of innovation and clustering: some introductory notes, Industrial and Corporate Strategy, 10(4), pp. 817–33.

Charles

(2003) Universities and territorial development: reshaping the regional role of UK universities, Local Economy, 18(1), February, pp. 7–21.

Ezkowitz

(1997) The Triple Helix: academy-industry-government relations and the growth of neocorporatist industrial policy in the US, in: Campodal'Orto

(Ed), Managing Technological Knowledge Transfer, EC Social Sciences COST A3, Vol. 4 (Brussels: EC Directorate General, Science, Research Development).

Florida

(2002) The Rise of the Creative Class (New York: Basic Books).

10.

Gertler

Wolfe

(2002) Innovation and Social Learning: Institutional Adaptation in an Era of Technological Change (London: Palgrave MacMillan).

11.

Glasson

(2003) The widening local and regional development impacts of the modern universities: a tale of two cities, Local Economy, 18(1), February, pp. 21–37.

12.

Hannula

(2002) Head of Regional Planning Council of Northern Ostrobothnia, interview, 6 July.

13.

Hyry

Ahokangas

Rasanen

(2002) The evolution of a regional technology-oriented cluster: the case of Oulu. Regional Studies Association Conference, 15–18 September (Gdansk, Poland).

14.

ICF Consulting (2000) Choosing a Future: A New Economic Vision for Ottawa (The Ottawa Economic Generators's Initiative).

15.

Infotech, University of Oulu (2003), Annual Report.

16.

Inguen

(2001) Universities create new business, Business Finland, pp. 15–6.

17.

Kenny

(ed) (2000) Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

18.

Lee

Chong Moon

Miller

Hancock

M. G.

Rowen

H. S.

(Eds) (2000) The Silicon Valley Edge: A Habitat for Entrepreneurship (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

19.

Look Oulu (2002) Oulu Tourist Information, Oulu City Council, Oulu.

20.

Lovio

(1993) Evolution of firm communities in new industries, Acta Academica Helsingiensis Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.

21.

Marjomma

(2002) Senior Lecturer, School of English and Cultural Studies, Oulu University, interview, 15 February.

22.

Nokia (2003) Available at http://www.Nokia.co.fi (accessed 25 September).

23.

Oksman

(2002) Formerly Vice Chancellor of Oulu University, interview, 5 April.

24.

Optimist (2003) Oulu Regional Plan, February, pp. 10–11, 12–14, 16–17, 27–28.

25.

Polar Electric (2003) Interview with Simon Drabble, Training Manager.

26.

Porter

(1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (London: MacMillan).

27.

Rovamo

(2003) Senior Lecturer, Oulu School of Business Studies interview, 14 February.

28.

Salo

(1998) History of the University of Oulu 1958–1993. (Oulu: University of Oulu).

29.

Saxenian

(1994) Regional Advantage, Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 Harvard, (MA: Harvard University Press).

30.

Simla

(2003) Dean, Oulu School of Business Studies, interview, 14 February.

31.

Technopolis (2002) Oulu, 2006. Available at http://www.ouka.fi/kasvusopimus/english/kluster/kluster.htm (accessed 23 September).

32.

Tekes (2002) Available at www.Tekes.com.fi (accessed 16 February).

33.

Tunkelo

(1988) Oulus Technologiakyla 1980–1988. Miten syntyi ouluilmio? SITRA saja A, Oulu.

34.

Tilastokeskus, Finland (Statistics Finland) (2003) Regional Unemployment Statistics.

35.

Viale

Ghiglione

(2002) The Triple Helix Model: A Tool for the Study of European Regional Socio-Economic Systems. Available at http://www.jrc.es/pages/iptsreport/vol29/english/REG1E296.htm (accessed 15 May 2003).

36.

Virtanen

(2001) Oulu: Silicon Valley of the North, Business Finland, pp. 26–30.

37.

Wikstedt

(1999) Interview, Kaleva, 6 March.

38.

Wolfe

(2003) Clusters from the inside and out: lessons from the Canadian study of cluster development, in: DRUID Summer Conference, 12–14 June (Copenhagen).

39.

Yla-Antila

(2002) Nokia and Oulu—national and regional growth drivers in Finland, Verdsikaping, kompetanse og innovasjon, mot en ny politick for nyskaping op naeringsutvikling, 8 May (Oslo).

40.

Yli-Renko

Autio

(1996) The Catalyzing Impact of New Technology Based Firms in Industrial Technological Renewal (Helsinki University of Technology).