Copper has been electrodeposited on copper (FCC) and mild steel (BCC) substrates from acidic sulphate bath with and without cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide at 0.25, 2, 6 and 9 V. It is found that the surface morphology varies with the change in overpotential, but not with the change in substrate. On the contrary, the crystal shape is found to be independent of the applied overpotential, but varies with the bath chemistry or choice of substrate.
SharmaA, BhattacharyaS, DasS, Fabrication of Sn nanostructures by template assisted pulse electrodeposition. Surf Eng. 2016;32(5):378–384. doi: 10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000091
2.
MartinsJI, NunesMC.On the kinetics of copper electroless plating with hypophosphite reductant. Surf Eng. 2016;32(5):363–371. doi: 10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000066
3.
KristofP, PritzkerM.Effect of electrolyte composition on the dynamics of hydrogen gas bubble evolution at copper microelectrodes. J Appl Electrochem. 1997;27(3):255–265. doi: 10.1023/A:1018472511901
4.
HunDQ, YangF, GongYY, Synthesis of magnetite films on copper substrate by hydrothermal method. Surf Eng. 2015;31(7):481–485. doi: 10.1179/1743294415Y.0000000009
5.
PradhanAK, DasS.Pulse-reverse electrodeposition of Cu–SiC nanocomposite coating: effect of concentration of SiC in the electrolyte. J Alloys Compd. 2014;590:294–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.139
6.
SharmaA, BhattacharyaS, DasS, A study on the effect of pulse electrodeposition parameters on the morphology of pure Tin coatings. Metall Trans A. 2014;45(10):4610–4622. doi: 10.1007/s11661-014-2389-8
7.
MallikM, MitraA, SenguptaS, Effect of current density on the nucleation and growth of crystal facets during pulse electrodeposition of Sn–Cu lead-free solder. Crystal Growth Design. 2014;14(12):6542–6549. doi: 10.1021/cg501440a
8.
ZhaoX, LuC, TieuA, Strengthening mechanisms and dislocation processes in<111> textured nanotwinned copper. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;676:474–486. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.127
9.
ZhangY, ZongBY, JinJ, Electroless copper plating on particulate reinforcements and effects on mechanical properties of SiCp/Fe composite. Surf Eng. 2015;31(3):232–239. doi: 10.1179/1743294414Y.0000000370
10.
StandishT, ChenJ, JacklinR, Corrosion of copper-coated steel high level nuclear waste containers under permanent disposal conditions. Electrochim Acta. 2016;211:331–342. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.135
11.
AugustinA, HuilgolP, UdupaKR, Effect of current density during electrodeposition on microstructure and hardness of textured Cu coating in the application of antimicrobial Al touch surface. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;63:352–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.013
12.
ChoudharyKR, KainV, HubliRC.Stirring effects on aluminium coatings electrodeposited in ionic liquids. Surf Eng. 2014;30(8):562–567. doi: 10.1179/1743294414Y.0000000278
13.
RajakS, BidayeAC, KainV, Substrate and current density effects on electrodeposited aluminium coatings. Surf Eng. 2013;29(9):677–682. doi: 10.1179/1743294413Y.0000000183
14.
LaiCS, HuXX, YauS, Electrodeposition of copper on an Au(111) electrode modified with mercaptoacetic acid in sulfuric acid. Electrochim Acta. 2016;203:272–280. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.055
15.
WalshFC, LowCTJ.A review of developments in the electrodeposition of tin-copper alloys. Surf Coat Technol. 2016;304:246–262. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.06.065
16.
WoodruffDP.How does your crystal grow? A commentary on Burton, Cabrera and Frank (1951) ‘The growth of crystals and the equilibrium structure of their surfaces’. Philos Trans R Soc London A. 2015;373(2039):171–181. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0230
ScholzF.Active sites of heterogeneous nucleation understood as chemical reaction sites. Electrochem Commun. 2011;13(9):932–933. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.06.003
20.
KumarSK, BiswasK.Effect of thiourea on grain refinement and defect structure of the pulsed electrodeposited nanocrystalline copper. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;214:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.018
21.
AL-ThabaitiSA, MalikMA, Al-YoubiAAO, Effects of surfactant and polymer on the morphology of advanced nanomaterials in aqueous solution. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2013;8:204–218.
22.
HosseiniSR, GhasemiS, GhasemiSA.Effect of surfactants on electrocatalytic performance of copper nanoparticles for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mol Liq. 2016;222:1068–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.08.013
23.
BeraRK, BhaumikA, RajCR.Facile growth of multi-twined Au nanostructures. J Chem Sci. 2015;127(12):2111–2118. doi: 10.1007/s12039-015-0989-5
24.
NikolicND, VesnaMM, PavlovicMG, Cross-section analysis of the morphology of electrodeposited copper obtained in the hydrogen co-deposition range. J Serb Chem Soc. 2009;74(6):689–696. doi: 10.2298/JSC0906689N
25.
SchwarzacherW.Electrodeposition: a technology for the future. Electrochem Soc Interface. 2016;15(1):32–35.
26.
RasmussenAA, JensenJAD, HorsewellA, Microstructure in electrodeposited copper layers; the role of the substrate. Electrochim Acta. 2001;47:67–74. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00583-7
27.
NikolicND, PopovKI, PavlovicLJ, Morphologies of copper deposits obtained by the electrodeposition at high overpotentials. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;201:560–566. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.12.004
28.
MilchevA, ZapryanovaT.Nucleation and growth of copper under combined charge transfer and diffusion limitations: part I. Electrochim Acta. 2006;51(14):2926–2933. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.08.045
29.
SekarR, JagadeshKK, BapuGNKR.Electrodeposition and characterisation of copper deposits from non-cyanide electrolytes. Surf Eng. 2015;31(6):433–438. doi: 10.1179/1743294414Y.0000000400
30.
ElizabethGG, MarioRR, MaríaRS, Overpotential nucleation and growth of copper onto polycrystalline and single crystal gold electrodes. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:3102–3114.
31.
ShaoW, PattanaikG, ZangariG.Influence of chloride anions on the mechanism of copper electrodeposition from acidic sulfate electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc. 2007;154(4):D201–D207. doi: 10.1149/1.2434682
32.
IbañezA, FatásE.Mechanical and structural properties of electrodeposited copper and their relation with the electrodeposition parameters. Surf Coat Technol. 2005;191:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.05.001
33.
BalasubramanianA, SrikumarDS, RajaG, Effect of pulse parameter on pulsed electrodeposition of copper on stainless steel. Surf Eng. 2009;25(5):389–392. doi: 10.1179/026708408X344680
MitraA, MallikM, SenguptaS, Effect of anodic passivation at high applied potential difference on the crystal shape and morphology of copper electrodeposits: thermodynamics and kinetics of electrocrystallization. Cryst Growth Des. 2017;14(12):6542–6549.
36.
Shape; Shape Software, Kingsport, TN.
37.
NikolicND, PopovKI, PavlovicLJ, The effect of hydrogen codeposition on the morphology of copper electrodeposits. I. The concept of effective overpotential. J Electroanal Chem. 2006;588:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.12.006
38.
YuriyIY, MarcelJR.Structural accelerating effect of chloride on copper electrodeposition. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:2454–2458. doi: 10.1002/anie.201207342
39.
MallikM.Synthesis and characterization of creep resistant Sn–Cu–Y2O3 nanocomposite lead-free solder [dissertation]. Kharagpur (India): Indian Institute of Technology at Kharagpur; (2016).
