In this investigation, microstructural variation across the dissimilar weld joint between modified 9Cr-1Mo ferritic steel and 316LN stainless steel with nickel-based filler metal was fabricated and characterized by various techniques. It was observed that the heterogeneous microstructure and non-uniform microhardness were developed across the dissimilar weld joint. Carbon-depleted soft zone, carbon-enriched hard zone, type I and type II boundaries are evident at the P91 heat-affected zone (HAZ) – buttering layer interface. An unmixed zone was observed at the weld metal-316 LN stainless steel HAZ interface. Distinct microstructures were developed across the dissimilar weld joint are due to the mismatch in chemical composition, crystal structure and melting temperature difference between base metals and filler metal.
BhaduriAKLahaK.Development of improved materials for structural components of sodium-cooled fast reactors. Procedia Eng. 2015; 130:598–608.
2.
TsengKHHsuCY.Performance of activated TIG process in austenitic stainless steel welds. J Mater Process Technol [Internet]. 2011; 211:503–512. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.11.003.
3.
SireeshaMShankarVAlbertSKMicrostructural features of dissimilar welds between 316LN austenitic stainless steel and alloy 800. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000; 292:74–82.
4.
DuPontJN.Microstructural evolution and high temperature failure of ferritic to austenitic dissimilar welds. Int Mater Rev. 2012; 57:208–234.
5.
BhaduriAKVenkadesanSRodriguezPPerformance of a trimetallic transition joint. Mater High Temp. 1992; 10:45–50.
6.
BhaduriAKVenkadesanSRodriguezPTransition metal joints for steam generators-An overview. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 1994; 58:251–265.
7.
KarthickKMalarvizhiSBalasubramanianVTensile properties variation across the dissimilar metal weld joint between modified 9Cr–1Mo ferritic steel and 316LN stainless steel at RT and 550 °C. Metallogr Microstruct Anal [Internet]. 2018; 7:209–221. Available from: doi:10.1007/s13632-018-0430-9.
8.
RathodDWSinghPKPandeySEffect of buffer-layered buttering on microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar metal weld joints for nuclear plant application. Mater Sci Eng A [Internet]. 2016; 666:100–113. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.053.
9.
JosephARaiSKJayakumarTEvaluation of residual stresses in dissimilar weld joints. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 2005; 82:700–705.
10.
WangWKLiuYZhangQBMicrostructure and local mechanical properties of a dissimilar metal welded joint with buttering layer in steam turbine rotor. Mater Sci Eng A [Internet]. 2019; 747:244–254. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.018.
11.
GhoshMSantoshRDasSKEffect of structural heterogeneity on in situ deformation of dissimilar weld between ferritic and austenitic steel. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2015; 46:3555–3568.
12.
SarikkaTAhonenMMouginotRMicrostructural, mechanical, and fracture mechanical characterization of SA 508-alloy 182 dissimilar metal weld in view of mismatch state. Int J Press Vessel Pip [Internet]. 2016; 145:13–22. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.06.004.
13.
ShariatpanahiAMFarhangiH.Microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar ferritic and austenitic steel joints with an intermediate inconel-182 buttering layer. Adv Mater Res [Internet]. 2009; 83–86:449–456. Available from: http://www.scientific.net/AMR.83-86.449.
14.
SireeshaMAlbertSKSundaresanS.Influence of high-temperature exposure on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar metal welds between modified 9Cr-1Mo steel and alloy 800. Metall Mater Trans a. 2005; 36:1495–1506.
15.
KarthickKMalarvizhiSBalasubramanianVTensile and impact toughness properties of various regions of dissimilar joints of nuclear grade steels. Nucl Eng Technol [Internet]. 2018; 50:116–125. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.net.2017.10.003.
16.
TaraphdarPKMahapatraMMPradhanAKEffects of groove configuration and buttering layer on the through-thickness residual stress distribution in dissimilar welds. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 2021; 192:104392.
17.
WinartoWAnisMHertantoTP.Mechanical properties and microstructure of welded dissimilar metals using buttering & non-buttering layer. Adv Mater Res. 2013; 789:341–346.
18.
SaffariHShamanianMBahramiAEffects of ERNiCr-3 butter layer on the microstructure and mechanical properties of API 5L X65/AISI304 dissimilar joint. J Manuf Process. 2020; 50:305–318.
19.
KarthickKMalarvizhiSBalasubramanianVTensile properties of shielded metal arc welded dissimilar joints of nuclear grade ferritic steel and austenitic stainless steel. J Mech Behav Mater [Internet]. 2016; 25:171–178. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jmbm-2017-0005/html.
20.
KarthickKMalarvizhiSBalasubramanianV.Evolution of microstructure at the interface region between parent metal (modified 9Cr–1Mo steel) and buttering layer (alloy 182) in dissimilar joints. J Adv Microsc Res [Internet]. 2017; 12:167–172. Available from: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asp/jamr/2017/00000012/00000003/art00002.
JonesWBHillsCRPolonisDH.Microstructural evolution of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel. Metall Trans A. 1991; 22:1049–1058.
23.
GanesanVMathewMDSankara RaoKB.Influence of nitrogen on tensile properties of 316LN SS. Mater Sci Technol [Internet]. 2009; 25:614–618. Available from: http://www.maneyonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/174328408X317066.
24.
ThakareJGPandeyCGuptaARole of the heterogeneity in microstructure on the mechanical performance of the Autogenous Gas Tungsten Arc (GTA) welded dissimilar joint of F/M P91 and SS304L steel. Fusion Eng Des. 2021; 168:112616.
25.
SirohiSPandeyCGoyalA.Role of the Ni-based filler (IN625) and heat-treatment on the mechanical performance of the GTA welded dissimilar joint of P91 and SS304H steel. J Manuf Process. 2021; 65:174–189.
26.
LippoldJCKoteckiDJ.Welding metallurgy and weldability of stainless steels. Wiley; 2005.
27.
NelsonTWLippoldJCMillsMJ.Investigation of boundaries and structures in dissimilar metal welds. Sci Technol Weld Join. 1998; 3:249–255.
28.
WuQXuQJiangYEffect of carbon migration on mechanical properties of dissimilar weld joint. Eng Fail Anal [Internet]. 2020; 117:104935. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104935.
29.
SiefertJAShingledeckerJPDuPontJNWeldability and weld performance of candidate nickel based superalloys for advanced ultrasupercritical fossil power plants part II: weldability and cross-weld creep performance. Sci Technol Weld Join. 2016; 21:397–427.
PavanAHVVikrantKSNRavibharathRDevelopment and evaluation of SUS 304H - IN 617 welds for advanced ultra supercritical boiler applications. Mater Sci Eng A [Internet]. 2015; 642:32–41. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.065.
32.
MaCMeiJPengQMicrostructure characterization of the fusion zone of an alloy 600-82 weld joint. J Mater Sci Technol [Internet]. 2015;31:1011-1017. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2015.08.013.
33.
MingHZhangZWangJMicrostructure of a safe-end dissimilar metal weld joint (SA508-52-316L) prepared by narrow-gap GTAW. Mater Charact [Internet]. 2017; 123:233–243. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.029.
34.
PandeyC.Mechanical and metallurgical characterization of dissimilar P92/SS304 L welded joints under varying heat treatment regimes. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci [Internet]. 2020; 51:2126–2142. Available from: doi:10.1007/s11661-020-05660-0.
35.
FalatLSvobodaMVýrostkováAMicrostructure and creep characteristics of dissimilar T91/TP316H martensitic/austenitic welded joint with Ni-based weld metal. Mater Charact [Internet]. 2012; 72:15–23. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2012.06.014.
36.
JayakumarTMathewMDLahaK.High temperature materials for nuclear fast fission and fusion reactors and advanced fossil power plants. Procedia Eng [Internet]. 2013; 55:259–270. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.252.
PandeyCGiriAMahapatraMMCharacterization of microstructure of HAZs in as-welded and service condition of P91 pipe weldments. Met Mater Int. 2017; 23:148–162.
