The present work investigates the dominant mechanisms in the plasticity of nano-sized fcc metallic samples. Molecular dynamics simulations of nanopillar compression show that plasticity always starts with the nucleation of dislocations at the free surface, and the crystal orientation affects the subsequent microstructural evolution. The Schmid factor of leading and trailing partials plays a decisive role in leading to the twinning, or slip deformation. A significant difference is observed in the strength of pillars of the same size with different orientations. The power-law equation exponent is completely dependent on the crystal orientations, and a weak or no size effect is observed in the compression of [100]- and [110]-oriented nanopillars. The observed orientation based behaviour decreases by confining the free surface.
TaylorGF.A method of drawing metallic filaments and a discussion of their properties and uses. Phys Rev. 1924; 23(5):655–660. DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.23.655
2.
BraggWLLomerWL.A dynamical model of a crystal structure. II. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1949; 196(1045):171–181. DOI:10.1098/rspa.1949.0022
3.
LomerWMBraggWL.A dynamical model of a crystal structure. III. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1949; 196(1045):182–194. DOI:10.1098/rspa.1949.0023
4.
HerringCGaltJK.Elastic and plastic properties of very small metal specimens. Phys Rev. 1952; 85(6):1060–1061. DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.85.1060.2
BrennerSS.Growth and properties of ‘whiskers’: further research is needed to show why crystal filaments are many times as strong as large crystals. Science. 1958; 128(3324):569–575. DOI:10.1126/science.128.3324.569
7.
FourieJT.The plastic deformation of thin copper single crystals: II. An electron microscope study of the surface structure. Can J Phys. 1967; 45(2):777–786. DOI:10.1139/p67-059
8.
NixWD.Mechanical properties of thin films. Metall Trans A. 1989; 20(11):2217–2245. DOI:10.1007/BF02666659
9.
NixWDGaoH.Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids. 1998; 46(3):411–425. DOI:10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0
10.
LubardaVA.On the analysis of pure bending of rigid-plastic beams in strain-gradient plasticity. Eur J Mech A/Solids. 2017; 63:43–52. DOI:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.12.001
11.
HashemianMForoutanSToghraieD.Comprehensive beam models for buckling and bending behavior of simple nanobeam based on nonlocal strain gradient theory and surface effects. Mech Mater. 2019; 139:103209. DOI:10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103209
12.
ChenWKitamuraTWangXSize effect on cyclic torsion of micro-polycrystalline copper considering geometrically necessary dislocation and strain gradient. Int J Fatigue. 2018; 117:292–298. DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.027
13.
TymiakNIKramerDEBahrDFPlastic strain and strain gradients at very small indentation depths. Acta Mater. 2001; 49(6):1021–1034. DOI:10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00378-5
14.
SahaRXueZHuangYIndentation of a soft metal film on a hard substrate: strain gradient hardening effects. J Mech Phys Solids. 2001; 49(9):1997–2014. DOI:10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00035-7
AifantisKESoerWADe HossonJTMInterfaces within strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiments. Acta Mater. 2006; 54(19):5077–5085. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.040
17.
MokiosGAifantisEC.Gradient effects in micro-/nanoindentation. Mater Sci Technol. 2012; 28(9–10):1072–1078. DOI:10.1179/1743284712Y.0000000053
18.
CampbellCJGillSPA.An analytical model for the flat punch indentation size effect. Int J Solids Struct. 2019; 171:81–91. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.05.004
19.
VoyiadjisGZSongY.Strain gradient continuum plasticity theories: theoretical, numerical and experimental investigations. Int J Plast. 2019; 121:21–75. DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.03.002
20.
WangCCaoQPFengTIndentation size effects of mechanical behavior and shear transformation zone in thin film metallic glasses. Thin Solid Films. 2018; 646:36–43. DOI:10.1016/j.tsf.2017.11.029
21.
Martínez-PañedaENiordsonCF.On fracture in finite strain gradient plasticity. Int J Plast. 2016; 80:154–167. DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.09.009
22.
BanHYaoYChenSThe coupling effect of size and damage in micro-scale metallic materials. Int J Plast. 2017; 95:251–263. DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.04.012
23.
DasSHofmannFTarletonE.Consistent determination of geometrically necessary dislocation density from simulations and experiments. Int J Plast. 2018; 109:18–42. DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.05.001
24.
LinPNieJLiuZStudy of two hardening mechanism caused by geometrically necessary dislocations in thin films with passivation layer. Int J Solids Struct. 2019; 160:59–67. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.10.015
25.
YuanSZhuYLiangSDislocation-density based size-dependent crystal plasticity framework accounting for climb of piled up dislocations at elevated temperature. Mech Mater. 2019; 134:85–97. DOI:10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.04.015
26.
KalácskaSDankháziZZilahiGInvestigation of geometrically necessary dislocation structures in compressed Cu micropillars by 3-dimensional HR-EBSD. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020; 770:138499, DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2019.138499
HuangYQuSHwangKCA conventional theory of mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity. Int J Plast. 2004; 20(4–5):753–782. DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.08.002
AifantisEC.Update on a class of gradient theories. Mech Mater. 2003; 35(3–6):259–280. DOI:10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00278-8
32.
GurtinMEAnandL.A theory of strain-gradient plasticity for isotropic, plastically irrotational materials. Part I: small deformations. J Mech Phys Solids. 2005; 53(7):1624–1649. DOI:10.1016/j.jmps.2004.12.008
33.
UchicMDDimidukDMFlorandoJNExploring specimen size effects in plastic deformation of Ni3(Al, Ta). Materials Research Society Symposium - Proceedings. 2003; 753:27–32. DOI:10.1557/proc-753-bb1.4
TsagrakisIKonstantinidisAAifantisEC.Size effects in tension: gradient internal variable and wavelet models. J Mech Behav Mater. 2003; 14(1):41–58. DOI:10.1515/JMBM.2003.14.1.41
36.
KonstantinidisA, AifantisEC, TsagrakisI.1D gradient material mechanics with applications at the nanoscale. Emerg Mater Res. 2012; 1(S1):41–49. DOI:10.1680/emr.2012.1.s1.006
37.
AifantisEC.Gradient material mechanics: perspectives and prospects. Acta Mech. 2014; 225(4):999–1012. DOI:10.1007/s00707-013-1076-y
38.
KonstantinidisAAZhangXAifantisEC.On the combined gradient-stochastic plasticity model: application to Mo-micropillar compression. AIP Conf Proc. 2015; 1646:3. DOI:10.1063/1.4908575
39.
AifantisE. C.. Internal length gradient (ILG) material mechanics across scales and disciplines. In: Advances in applied mechanics, vol. 49. Academic Press; 2016. p. 1–110.
40.
DimidukDMUchicMDRaoSIOverview of experiments on microcrystal plasticity in FCC-derivative materials: selected challenges for modelling and simulation of plasticity. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2007; 15(2):135–146. DOI:10.1088/0965-0393/15/2/009
41.
GreerJROliverWCNixWD.Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the micron scale in the absence of strain gradients. Acta Mater. 2005; 53(6):1821–1830. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031
42.
GreerJRNixWD.Nanoscale gold pillars strengthened through dislocation starvation. Phys Rev B – Condens Matter Mater Phys. 2006; 73(24):245410. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410
43.
El-AwadyJA.Unravelling the physics of size-dependent dislocation-mediated plasticity. Nat Commun. 2015; 6(1):1–9. DOI:10.1038/ncomms6926
44.
IssaIAmodeoJRéthoréJIn situ investigation of MgO nanocube deformation at room temperature. Acta Mater. 2015; 86:295–304. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.001
45.
ChisholmCBeiHLowryMBDislocation starvation and exhaustion hardening in Mo alloy nanofibers. Acta Mater. 2012; 60(5):2258–2264. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.027
46.
FlanaganTJKovalenkoORabkinEThe effect of defects on strength of gold microparticles. Scr Mater. 2019; 171:83–86. DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.06.023
47.
ZhangPSalmanOUZhangJ-YTaming intermittent plasticity at small scales. Acta Mater. 2017; 128:351–364. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.039
48.
KienerDMinorAM.Source truncation and exhaustion: insights from quantitative in situ TEM tensile testing. Nano Lett. 2011; 11(9):3816–3820. DOI:10.1021/nl201890s
49.
RinaldiAPeraltaPFriesenCSample-size effects in the yield behavior of nanocrystalline nickel. Acta Mater. 2008; 56(3):511–517. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.044
50.
ParthasarathyTARaoSIDimidukDMContribution to size effect of yield strength from the stochastics of dislocation source lengths in finite samples. Scr Mater. 2007; 56(4):313–316. DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.09.016
51.
RaoSIDimidukDMTangMEstimating the strength of single-ended dislocation sources in micron-sized single crystals. Philos Mag. 2007; 87(30):4777–4794. DOI:10.1080/14786430701591513
52.
El-AwadyJAWenMGhoniemNM.The role of the weakest-link mechanism in controlling the plasticity of micropillars. J Mech Phys Solids. 2009; 57(1):32–50. DOI:10.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.004
53.
WangZJLiQJShanZWSample size effects on the large strain bursts in submicron aluminum pillars. Appl Phys Lett. 2012; 100(7):071906, DOI:10.1063/1.3681582
54.
LiangZYDe HossonJTMHuangMX.Size effect on deformation twinning in face-centred cubic single crystals: experiments and modelling. Acta Mater. 2017; 129:1–10. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.063
55.
SamaeeVGattiRDevincreBDislocation driven nanosample plasticity: new insights from quantitative in-situ TEM tensile testing. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):12012. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-30639-8
56.
WangLTengJWuYSize dependence of dislocation activities and independence on theoretical elastic strain limit in Pt nanocrystals revealed by atomic-resolution in situ investigation. Mater Today Nano. 2018; 2:1–6. DOI:10.1016/j.mtnano.2018.04.007
57.
ZhaoXXWuJChiuYLCritical dimension for the dislocation structure in deformed copper micropillars. Scr Mater. 2019; 163:137–141. DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.01.020
58.
ZhouCBeyerleinIJLeSarR.Plastic deformation mechanisms of fcc single crystals at small scales. Acta Mater. 2011; 59(20):7673–7682. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.032
59.
CuiYNLinPLiuZLTheoretical and numerical investigations of single arm dislocation source controlled plastic flow in FCC micropillars. Int J Plast. 2014; 55:279–292. DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.011
60.
RyuICaiWNixWDStochastic behaviors in plastic deformation of face-centered cubic micropillars governed by surface nucleation and truncated source operation. Acta Mater. 2015; 95:176–183. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.032
61.
LeungPSSLeungHSChengBSize dependence of yield strength simulated by a dislocation-density function dynamics approach. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2015; 23(3):035001. DOI:10.1088/0965-0393/23/3/035001
62.
HuJLiuZVan der GiessenEStrain rate effects on the plastic flow in submicron copper pillars: considering the influence of sample size and dislocation nucleation. Extrem Mech Lett. 2017; 17:33–37. DOI:10.1016/j.eml.2017.09.011
63.
SansozF.Atomistic processes controlling flow stress scaling during compression of nanoscale face-centered-cubic crystals. Acta Mater. 2011; 59(9):3364–3372. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.011
64.
YaghoobiMVoyiadjisGZ.Size effects in fcc crystals during the high rate compression test. Acta Mater. 2016; 121:190–201. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.010
65.
WeinbergerCRTuckerGJ.Atomistic simulations of dislocation pinning points in pure face-centered-cubic nanopillars. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2012; 20(7):075001. DOI:10.1088/0965-0393/20/7/075001
66.
TuckerGJAitkenZHGreerJRThe mechanical behavior and deformation of bicrystalline nanowires. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2013; 21(1):015004. DOI:10.1088/0965-0393/21/1/015004
67.
XuSGuoYFNganAHW.A molecular dynamics study on the orientation, size, and dislocation confinement effects on the plastic deformation of Al nanopillars. Int J Plast. 2013; 43:116–127. DOI:10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.002
68.
RohithPSainathGSrinivasanVS.Effect of size, temperature and strain rate on dislocation density and deformation mechanisms in Cu nanowires. Phys B Condens Matter. 2019; 561:136–140. DOI:10.1016/j.physb.2019.03.003
69.
KorchuganovAVTyumentsevANZolnikovKPNucleation of dislocations and twins in fcc nanocrystals: dynamics of structural transformations. J Mater Sci Technol. 2019; 35(1):201–206. DOI:10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.025
FoilesSMBaskesMIDawMS.Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys Rev B. 1986; 33(12):7983–7991. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983
72.
O'BrienCJBarrCMPricePMGrain boundary phase transformations in PtAu and relevance to thermal stabilization of bulk nanocrystalline metals. J Mater Sci. 2018; 53(4):2911–2927. DOI:10.1007/s10853-017-1706-1
73.
FakenDJónssonH.Systematic analysis of local atomic structure combined with 3D computer graphics. Comput Mater Sci. 1994; 2(2):279–286. DOI:10.1016/0927-0256(94)90109-0
74.
TsuzukiHBranicioPSRinoJP.Structural characterization of deformed crystals by analysis of common atomic neighborhood. Comput Phys Commun. 2007; 177(6):518–523. DOI:10.1016/j.cpc.2007.05.018
75.
StukowskiAAlbeK.Extracting dislocations and non-dislocation crystal defects from atomistic simulation data. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2010; 18(8):085001. DOI:10.1088/0965-0393/18/8/085001
76.
StukowskiA.Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2010; 18(1):015012. DOI:10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012
77.
RohithPSainathGChoudharyBK.Effect of orientation and mode of loading on deformation behaviour of Cu nanowires. Comput Condens Matter. 2018; 17:e00330. DOI:10.1016/j.cocom.2018.e00330
78.
LeeSWHanSMNixWD.Uniaxial compression of fcc Au nanopillars on an MgO substrate: the effects of prestraining and annealing. Acta Mater. 2009; 57(15):4404–4415. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.002
79.
KimJYGreerJR.Tensile and compressive behavior of gold and molybdenum single crystals at the nano-scale. Acta Mater. 2009; 57(17):5245–5253. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.027
80.
MaaßRVan PetegemSMaDSmaller is stronger: the effect of strain hardening. Acta Mater. 2009; 57(20):5996–6005. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.024
81.
KienerDMinorAM.Source-controlled yield and hardening of Cu(100) studied by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Acta Mater. 2011; 59(4):1328–1337. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.065
