AbbagnanoN. (1967). Humanism in the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 4, New York, MacMillan.
2.
BeckerH. S. (1967). Whose Side are we On?, Journal of Social Problems, 14, 239–247.
3.
BickmanL. (1981), Some Distinctions Between Basic and Applied Approaches, en L. Bickman. Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 2, Beverly Hills, Sage, 23–44.
4.
BlakerF. H. M.BrownC. A. (1980), Whatever Happened to Shell's New Philosophy of Management?: Lessons for the 1980s from a Mayor Socio-technical Intervention of the1960s, Farnborough. Saxon House.
5.
BlakelyC. H.EmshoffJ. G.RoitmanD. B. (1984), Implementing Innovative Programs in Public Sector Organizations, en S. Oskamp, Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 5, Beverly Hills, Sage, 87–108.
6.
BraydbrookeD.LindblomC. E. (1963), A Strategy of Decision, New York. Free Press.
7.
BurgoyneJ. G.CooperC. L. (1975). Evaluation Methodology, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 48, 53–62.
8.
BurrelG.MorganG. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, London, Heinemann.
9.
BushM.GordonA. C. (1978). Client Choice and Bureaucratic Accountability: Possibilities for Responsiveness in a Social Welfare Bureaucracy, Journal of Social Issues, 34, 22–43.
10.
CamhisM. (1979), Planning theory and Philosophy, London, Tavistock.
11.
CampbellD. T. (1969). Reforms as Experiments.American Psychologist, 24, 409–429.
12.
CampbellD. T. (1971), Methods for the Experimenting Society, American Psychological Association, Washington.
13.
CampbellD. T. (1974), Evolutionary Epistemology, en P. A. Schilpp, The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, Open Court Press, 413–463.
14.
CampbellD. T. (1975a), Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change, en G. M. Lyons, Social Research and Public Policies, Hanover, University Press of New England.
15.
CampbellD. T. (1975b), Reforms as Experiments, en L. Struening & M. Guttentag, Handbook of Evaluation Research, vol. I. Beverly Hills, Sage, 71–100.
16.
CampbellD. T. (1982). Experiments as Arguments, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 327–337.
17.
CohenM. D.et al. (1976), People, Problems, Solutions and the Ambiguity of Relevance, en J. G. March & J. P. Olsen, Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, Bergen, University of Bergen.
18.
CookT. D.Levinson-RoseJ.PollardW. E. (1980). The Misutilization of Evaluation Research: Some Pitfalls of Definition, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1, 477–498.
19.
CookT. D.LevitonL. C.ShadishW. R. (1985), Program Evaluation, en G. Lindzey & E. Aronson, Handbook of Social Psychology, New York, Random House, vol. 1, 699–777.
20.
CronbachL. J.et al. (1980), Toward Reform of Program Evaluation, San Francisco, Jossey Bass.
21.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of Planning, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hail.
22.
ChenH. T.RossiP. H. (1980). The Multi-Goal, Theory-Driven Approach to Evaluation: A Model Linking Basic and Applied Social Science, Social Forces, 59, 106–122.
23.
DavisH. R.SalasinS. E. (1975), The Utilization of Evaluation, en E. Struening & M. Guttentag, Handbook of Evaluation Research, vol. 1, Beverly Hills, Sage.
24.
DeutscherI. (1976). Public Issues or Private Troubles: Is Evaluation Research Sociological?, Sociological Focus, 9, 231–238.
25.
DooleyD. (1984), Social Research Methods, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
26.
DrorY. (1973), The Planning Process: A Facet Design, En FaludiA. (Ed.), A Reader in Planning Theory, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
27.
DunnW. N. (1982). Reforms as Arguments, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 293–326.
28.
EtzioniA. (1968a), The Active Society, London, Collier-McMillan & Free Press.
29.
EtzioniA. (1968b). Shortcuts to Social Change, Public Interest, 12, 40–51.
30.
EtzioniA. (1973), Mixed-Scanning: A «Third» Approach to Decision-Making, en A. Faludi, A Reader in Planning Theory, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
31.
Fernandez BallesterosR. (1983), Valoración de Intervenciones, en R. Fernández Ballesteros, Psicodiagnóstico, Madrid, U.N.E.D., 2.o vol., 1349–1376.
FettermanD. M. (1981). Blaming the victim: The Problem of Evaluation Design and Federal Involvement, and Reinforcing World Views in Education, Human Organization, 40, 67–77.
34.
FoucaultM. (1970), Les Mots et les Choses. París. Gallimard.
35.
FreemanH. E.SolomonM. A. (1981). Introduction: Evaluation and the Uncertain '80s, en H. E. Freeman & M. A. Solomon, Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Beverly Hills, Sage, vol. 6, 13–24.
36.
FriendJ. K.JessopW. N. (1969). Local Government and Strategic Choice, London, Tavistock.
37.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1981). Effective Evaluation, San Francisco, Jossey Bass.
38.
GutekB. A. (1978). Strategies for Studying Client Satisfaction, Journal of Social Issues, 34, 44–56.
39.
HageJ. (1980), Theories of Organizations: Form, Process, and Transformation, New York, Wiley.
40.
HallP. (1974). Urban and Regional Planning, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
41.
HouseE. R. (1982), Introduction: Scientific and Humanistic Evaluations, en E. R. House et al., Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Beverly Hills, Sage, vol. 7, 15–25.
Jimenez BurilloF.et al. (1983), La Psicología: Contribución al Diseño de una Sociedad con Calidad de Vida, Ponencias del I Congreso del Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos, Madrid, Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos, 87–106.
44.
JonesB. D. (1980). The Advocate, the Auditor, and the Program Manager: Statistical Decision Theory and Human Service Programs.Evaluation Review, 4, 275–305.
45.
KidderL. H.SeltizC. A.WrightsmanL.CookS. (1981), Research Methods in Social RelationsNew York, Holt Rinehart & Winston (1a ed. 1951).
46.
KieslerCH.A. (1980), Psychology and Public Policy, en L. Bickman, Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 1, Beverly Hills, Sage, 49–67.
47.
KiresukT. (1973). Goal Attainment Scaling at a County Mental Health Service, Evaluation, 1, 12–18.
LeithwoodK. A.MontgomeryD. J. (1980). Evaluating Program Implementation, Evaluation Review, 4, 193–313.
50.
LindblomC. E. (1959), The Science of Muddling Through, Public Administration Review, 4.
51.
LynnL. R. (1977), Policy Relevant Social Research: What Does it. Look Like?, en M. Guttentag & S. Saar, Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 2. Beverly Hills, Sage.
52.
MannheimK. (1936), Ideology and Utopia, New York. Hartcourt & Brace.
53.
McguireW. J. (1965). Discussion of William N. Schoenfield's Paper, en O. Klineberg & R. Christie, Perspectives in Social Psychology, New York, Holt Rinehart & Winston.
54.
McraeD. (1967), The Social Function of Social Science, New Haven. Yale University Press.
55.
MassadP. M.SalesB. D.SabatierP. (1983). Influencing State Legislative Decisions, en L. Bickman, Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 4, Beverly Hills, Sage, 95–116.
56.
MeidingerE.SchnaibergA. (1980). Social Impact Assessment as Evaluation Research: Claimants and Claims, Evaluation Review, 4, 507–535.
57.
MertonR. K. (1968), Social Theory and Social Strutture, Gléncoe, The Free Press.
58.
MintzbergH. (1973), The Nature of Managerial Work, New York, Harper & Row.
59.
MoralesJ. F. (1981), El Método Experimental y Correlacional en Psicología Social, en J. F. Morales, Metodología y Teoría de la Psicología, Madrid, U.N.E.D., 2° vol., 415–438.
60.
MoralesJ. F. (1982), Hacia un Modelo Integrado de Psicología Social Aplicada, en J. R. Torregrosa & E. Crespo, Estudios Básicos de Psicologia Social, Barcelona, Hora, 701–727.
61.
MorganG.SmircichL. (1980). The Case for Qualitative Research, Academy of Management Review, 5, 491–500.
62.
PillemerD. B.LightR. J. (1980). Synthesizing Outcomes: How to Use Research Evidence from Many Studies.Harvard Educational Review, 50, 176–195.
63.
ProshanskyH. M. (1981), Uses and Abuses of Theory in Applied Research, en L. Bickman, Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 2, Beverly Hills, Sage, 97–136.
64.
RaizenS. A.RossiP. H. (1982). Summary of Program Evaluation in Education: When?: How?: to What Ends? en E. R. House et al., Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Beverly Hills, Sage, vol. 7, 31–52.
65.
RosenthalR. (1983), Meta-Analysis: Toward a More Comulative Social Science, en L. Bickman, Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 4, Beverly Hills, Sage, 65–93.
66.
RossiP. H. (1969), Practice, Method, and Theory in Evaluating Social Action Programs, en J. L. Sundquist, On Fighting Poverty, New York, Basic Brooks.
67.
RossiP. H. (1972). Testing for success or Failure in Social Action, en P. H. Rossi & W. Williams, Evaluating Social Programs, New York, Seminar Press.
SaxeL.FineM. (1980). Reorienting Social Psychology Toward Application: A Methodological Analysis, en L. Bickman.Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 1, Beverly Hills, Sage. 71–91.
70.
ScrivenM. (1967), The Methodology of Evaluation, en R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne & M. Scriven, Perspectives on Curriculum Evaluation, Chicago, Rand MacNally.
71.
SeveryL. J.HouldenP.WilmothG. H. (1981), Community Acceptance of Innovative Programs, en L. Bickman. Applied Social Psychology Annual, vol. 2, Beverly Hills, Sage, 71–95.
72.
SilvermanD. (1970), The Theory of Organizations, London, Heinemann.
73.
SimonH. A. (1957), Models of Man, New York. Wiley.
74.
SjobergG. (1975), Politics, Ethics and Evaluation Research, en M. Guttentag & E. L. Struening, Handbook of Evaluation Research, vol. 2, Beverly Hills, Sage, 29–51.
75.
SproullL. (1977), Management Attention in New Education Programs: A Micro-Behavioral Study of Program Implementation, en K. Legge, 1984, Evaluating Planned Organizational Change, London, Academic Press.
76.
SproullL.LarreyP. (1979), Managerial Behavior and Evaluator Effectiveness, en H. C. Schulberg, & J. M. Jerrell, The Evaluator and Management, Beverly Hills, Sage.
77.
StarkmanS. A.BellisD. (1977). A Novel Approach to Assessment of Teacher Preparation Program Effectiveness, Evaluation, 1, 329–339.
78.
StewardtR. (1967), Managers and Their Jobs.London, McMillan.
79.
StewardtR. (1976), Contrasts in Management, London, McGrawHill.
80.
StufflebeamD. L.WebsterW. J. (1980). An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3, 5–20.
81.
SuchmanE. A. (1967a). Evaluation Research, New York, Russell Sage.
82.
SuchmanF. A. (1967b). Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs, New York, Russell Sage.
83.
SuchmanE. A. (1970), Action for what?: A Critique of Evaluative Research, en R. O'Toole, The Organization, Management and Tactics of Social Research, Cambridge, Schenkma.
84.
ThompsonM. S. (1975), Evaluation for Decision in Social Programmes, Glasgow, Saxon House & Lexington Books.
85.
ToulminS. (1958), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
86.
WarrenR. (1973), The Social Context of Program Evaluation Research, en K. Legge, 1984, Evaluating Planned Organizational Change, London, Academic Press.
87.
WeissC. H. (1972a), Evaluation Research. Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
88.
WeissC. H. (1972), Evaluating Action Programs, Boston, Allyn & Bacon.
89.
WeissC. H. (1975), Evaluation Research in the Political Context, en E. L. Struening & M. Guttentag, Handbook of Evaluation Research, vol. I, Beverly Hills, Sage, 13–26.
90.
WeissC. H. (1982), Measuring the Use of Evaluation, en E. R. House, et al., Evaluation Studies Review Annual, vol. 7, Beverly Hills, Sage, 129–145.
91.
WeissC. H.BucuvalasM. J. (1980). Truth Tests and Utility Tests Decision-Makers' Frames of Reference for Social Science Research, American sociological Review, 45, 302–313.
92.
WholeyJ. S. (1981), Using Evaluation to Improve Program Performance, en R. A. Levine et al., Evaluation Research and Practice: Comparative and International Perspectives, Beverly Hills, Sage, 92–106.
93.
YoungT. R. (1981). Sociology and Human Knowledge: Scientific versus Folk Methods.The American Sociologist, 16, 119–124.