En este trabajo se pretende situar las ideas actuales sobre los procesos de atribución en el contexto más amplio de la psicología de las explicaciones. Una serie de presupuestos centrales de la teoría de la atribución se ponen en cuestión y la orientación, fundamentalmente intrapsíquica, de la teoría de la atribución se sitúa dentro de un análisis de los procesos interpersonales. El análisis que aquí se aporta intenta mostrar que los procesos interpersonales y sociales constituyen un elemento vital de cualquier psicología de las explicaciones. La interrelación en la interpretación de los tres niveles analizados implica que la investigación de todos ellos es vital para la compresión de las explicaciones en la vida cotidiana.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyleM. (1969). Social Interaction. Methuen. London.
2.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
3.
AverillT. R. (1974). An Analysis of psychophysical symbolism and its influence on theories of emotion.J. Theory Soc. Behav.4, 147–190.
4.
BorgidaE. (1978). Scientific deduction: evidence is not necessarily informative: a reply to Wells and Harvey.J. Person. Soc. Psychol.36, 477–482.
5.
BrownR. (1965). Social Psychology. The Free Press. New York.
6.
BungeM. (1959). Causality: The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science.Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
7.
BussA. (1978). Causes and reasons in attribution theory: a conceptual critique.J. Person. Soc. Psychol.36, 1311–1321.
8.
ClarkH. H. (1978). Inferring what is meant. EnStudies in the Perception of Language (LevettW. J. M.flures d'arcaisG.B., Eds.). Wiley. London.
9.
CoulthardM. (1975). Discourse analysis in English—a short review of the literature.Lang. Ling. Ahstr.8, 73–89.
10.
CoveneyP. (1967). The image of Childhood. Harmondsworth, London.
11.
DouglasM. (1970). Natural Symbols. Barrie and Rockliffe. London.
12.
Evans-PritchardE. E. (1937). Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
13.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall. New Jersey.
14.
GergenK. (1973). Social Psychology as history.J. Person. Soc. Psychol.26, 309–320.
15.
GriceH. P. (1957). Meaning.Phil. Rev.66, 377–388.
16.
GriceH. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. EnSyntax and Semantics, vol. 3 (ColeP.MorganJ. L., Eds.). Academic Press. New York.
17.
HarreR. (1981). Expressive Aspects of Descriptions of Others. EnThe Psychology of Ordinary Explanations of Social Behaviour (AntakiCh., Ed.). Academic Press. New York.
18.
HeiderF. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Wiley. New York.
19.
HerzlichC. (1973). Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis. Academic Press. London.
20.
IzardC. E. (1971). The Face of Emotion. Appleton Century Croft. New York.
21.
JonesE. E.DavisK. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: the attribution process in person perception. EnAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2 (BerkowitzL., ed.). Academic Press. New York.
22.
JoosM. (1962). The five clocks, Int. J. Am. Ling. 28. 5.a parte.
23.
KelleyH. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. EnNebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 15 (LevineD., Ed.). University of Nebraska Press. Lincoln.
24.
LalljeeM. (1979). Report to the Social Science Research Council on Research Grant HR 5092.The explanations provided by young children and adults for actions and emotions.
25.
Levy-BruhiL. (1928). The Soul of the Primitive. Allen and Unwin. London.
26.
McarthurL. A. (1972). The how and what of why: some determinants and consequences of causal attribution.J. Person. Soc. Psychol.22, 171–193.
27.
MeadM. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa. Penguin. Harmondsworth.
28.
NgubaneH. (1977). Body and Mind in Zulu Medicine. Academic Press. London.
29.
NisbettR. E.CaputoC.LegantP.MaracekJ. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer.J. Person. Soc. Psychol.27, 154–164.
30.
NisbettR. E.v.BorgidaE. (1975). Attribution and the psychology of prediction.J. Person. Soc. Psychol.32, 932–943.
31.
PharesE. J. (1976). Locus of Control in Personality. General Learning Press. New Jersey.
32.
RobinsonW. P. (1972). Language and Social Behaviour. Penguin. Harmondsworth.
33.
RommetveitR. (1974). On Message Structure. Wiley. London.
34.
RossL. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. EnAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 10 (BerkowitzL., ed.). Academic Press. New York.
35.
SchegloffE. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. EnStudies in Social Interactions (SudnowD., Ed.). Free Press. Glencoe.
36.
ScottM. B.LymanS. M. (1968). Accounts.Am. Soc. Rev. vol. 33.
37.
SecordP. F.BackmanC. W. (1974). Social Psychology. 2.a ed. McGraw-Hill. New York.
38.
TedeschiJ.ReissM. (1981). Verbal Strategies in Impression Management. EnThe Psychology of Ordinary Explanations of Social Behaviour (AntakiCh., ed.). Academic Press. London.
39.
TuckerN. (1977). What is a child? Fontana. London.
40.
VanDERPligtJ. (1981). Actors' and Observers' Explanations: Divergent Perspectives or Divergent Evaluations? EnThe Psychology of Ordinary Explanations of Social Behaviour (AntakiCh. ed.). Academic Press. London.
41.
WallaceW. A. (1972). Causality and Scientific Explanations. University of Michigan Press. Michigan.
42.
WellsG. L.HarveyJ. H. (1977). Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions?J. Person. Soc. Psychol.35, 279–293.
43.
WellsG. L.HarveyJ. H. (1978). Naive attributors' attributions and predictions: what is informative and when is an effect.J. Person. Soc. Psychol.36, 483–490.
44.
ZiglerE.ChildI. L. (1969). Socialization. EnThe Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 3 (LindzeyG.AronsonE., eds.) Adison-Wesley. Massachussetts.
45.
ZuckermanM. (1979). Attribution of sucess and failure revisited, or: the morivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory.J. Person.47, 245–287.
