Cognitive flexibility moderates the association between theory of mind and children’s offer in the Ultimatum Game ( La flexibilidad cognitiva modera la relación entre la teoría de la mente y las ofertas de los niños en el Juego del Ultimátum )

Abstract

Spanish

This study examined the cognitive predictors and constraints of children’s strategic offers in the Ultimatum Game. The Ultimatum Game is a one-shot negotiation on the division of a given sum of rewards between two people, where the receiver has the right to punish the proposer by rejecting unfair offers, which results in nil reward for either party. Ninety-four Hong Kong children ranged between three and six years of age (48 girls, M = 4.94, SD = 0.90) participated in an Ultimatum Game, and tasks measuring theory of mind, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control and verbal ability. Children’s theory of mind, measured with false belief understanding tasks, was positively associated with their Ultimatum Game offers. Regression analysis further demonstrated that cognitive flexibility moderated the association between false belief understanding and children’s offers in the Ultimatum Game. Being able to take the opponent’s perspective prompted children to offer more in the Ultimatum Game, but only when their cognitive flexibility was low.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allgaier

Ścigała

K. A.

Trautwein

Hilbig

B. E.

Zettler

(2020). Honesty-humility and dictator and Ultimatum Game-giving in children. Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103907

Artinger

Exadaktylos

Koppel

Sääksvuori

. (2014). In others’ shoes: Do individual differences in empathy and theory of mind shape social preferences? PLoS One, 9(4), e92844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092844

Baumert

Schlösser

Schmitt

. (2014). Economic games: A performance-based assessment of fairness and altruism. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000183

Blake

P. R

. (2018). Giving what one should: Explanations for the knowledge-behavior gap for altruistic giving. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.041

Burkart

J. M.

Rueth

. (2013). Preschool children fail primate prosocial game because of attentional task demands. PLoS One, 8(7), e68440. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068440

Camerer

C. F

. (2003). Behavioral game theory. Princeton University Press.

Chen

Zhu

Chen

. (2013). Family income affects children’s altruistic behavior in the Dictator Game. PLoS One, 8(11), e80419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080419

Deák

G. O.

Wiseheart

. (2015). Cognitive flexibility in young children: General or task-specific capacity? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 138, 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.003

Debove

Baumard

André

J. B

. (2016). Models of the evolution of fairness in the Ultimatum Game: A review and classification. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(3), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.01.001

10.

Diamond

. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

11.

Fehr

Bernhard

Rockenbach

. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155

12.

Frye

Zelazo

P. D.

Palfai

. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10(4), 483–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(95)90024-1

13.

Gerstadt

C. L.

Hong

Y. J.

Diamond

. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 312–7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-X

14.

Gignac

G. E.

Szodorai

E. T

. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069

15.

Gopnik

Astington

J. W

. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130386

16.

Hair

Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E

. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education International.

17.

Hughes

Adlam

Happé

Jackson

Taylor

Caspi

. (2000). Good test—retest reliability for standard and advanced false-belief tasks across a wide range of abilities. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(4), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00633

18.

Imuta

Henry

J. D.

Slaughter

Selcuk

Ruffman

. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1192–1205. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000140

19.

Larney

Rotella

Barclay

. (2019). Stake size effects in Ultimatum Game and dictator game offers: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.002

20.

Leman

P. J.

Keller

Takezawa

Gummerum

. (2009). Children’s and adolescents’ decisions about sharing money with others. Social Development, 18(3), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00486.x

21.

Lucas

M. M.

Wagner

Chow

. (2008). Fair game: The intuitive economics of resource exchange in four-year olds. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(3), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099353

22.

Mahy

C. E.

Bernstein

D. M.

Gerrard

L. D.

Atance

C. M

. (2017). Testing the validity of a continuous false belief task in 3-to 7-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.010

23.

Montgomery

D. E.

Koeltzow

T. E

. (2010). A review of the day–night task: The Stroop paradigm and interference control in young children. Developmental Review, 30(3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.07.001

24.

Oosterbeek

Sloof

Van de Kuilen

. (2004). Cultural differences in Ultimatum Game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026978.14316.74

25.

Paulus

Licata

Kristen

Thoermer

Woodward

Sodian

. (2015). Social understanding and self-regulation predict pre-schoolers’ sharing with friends and disliked peers: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414537923

26.

Pérez

B. L.

Patel

Zuffianò

. (2022). Theory of mind and children’s comforting behaviour. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje, 45(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1952774

27.

Repacholi

Slaughter

Pritchard

Gibbs

. (2003). Theory of mind, Machiavellianism, and social functioning in childhood. In Repacholi

Slaughter

(Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 67–97). Psychology Press.

28.

Rochat

Dias

M. D. G.

Guo

Broesch

Passos-Ferreira

Winning

Berg

. (2009). Fairness in distributive justice by 3- and 5-year-olds across 7 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(3), 416–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109332844

29.

Sally

Hill

E. L

. (2006). The development of interpersonal strategy: Autism, theory of mind, cooperation and fairness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.015

30.

Smith

C. E.

Blake

P. R.

Harris

P. L

. (2013). I should but I won’t: Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PLoS One, 8(3), e59510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059510

31.

Steinbeis

Bernhardt

B. C.

Singer

. (2012). Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron, 73(5), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027

32.

Takagishi

Kameshima

Schug

Koizumi

Yamagishi

. (2010). Theory of mind enhances preference for fairness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1–2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.09.005

33.

Takagishi

Koizumi

Fujii

Schug

Kameshima

Yamagishi

. (2014). The role of cognitive and emotional perspective taking in economic decision making in the Ultimatum Game. PLoS One, 9(9), e108462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108462

34.

Wellman

H. M

. (2014). Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford University Press.

35.

Wimmer

Perner

. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and the containing function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5