Este artículo, a partir de los resultados de las investigaciones sobre el subproceso de revisión y de los modelos más recientes que explican las operaciones implicadas en él, analiza los protocolos de las interacciones orales de un grupo de tres alumnos adolescentes (13–14 años) trabajando en grupo y formula algunas observaciones referidas al tipo de revisiones que efectúan. En esta situación de producción en grupo se pone de manifiesto: a)que los alumnos realizan numerosas operaciones de revisión que en su mayoría no se reflejan en cambios en el texto; b)que dichas revisiones afectan a todos los niveles de producción desde los superficiales a los globales referidos al contenido y a la función del texto y a la situación discursiva; c)que las revisiones pretextuales son fundamentalmente de dos tipos: las que afectan a los planes elaborados oralmente y la que afecta a los que llamaremos texto intentado, o producciones orales formuladas para ser escritas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApplebeeA.N. (Ed.) (1984). Context f or Learning to Write: Studies of Secondary School Instruction.Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.
2.
BartlettE.J. (1982). Learning to revise: Some component processes. A Nystrand, M. (Ed.):What Writers Know.Nueva York: Academic Press, 345–363.
3.
BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition.Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
4.
BridwellL. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' transactional writing.Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 197–222.
5.
BrittonJ. (1987). Writing and Reading in the Classroom. Center for the Study of Writing, Technical Report, 8. Berkeley: University of California y Pittsburg: Carnegie Mellon University.
6.
CalkinsL. Mc (1986). The art of Teaching Writing. Portsmouth, NH.: Heinemann.
7.
CampsA. (1989). Modelos del proceso de redacción: algunas implicaciones para la enseñanza.Infancia y Aprendizaje, 49, 3–19.
8.
CampsA. (1990). Models del procés i ensenyament de la redacció. A Camps, A., et al.:Text i ensenyament. Una aproximadó interdisciplinària.Barcelona: Barcanova.11–29.
9.
CassanyD. (1989). La correcció del treball escrit.Vic: Eumo.
10.
CooperCH.R.MatsuhashiA. (1983). A theory of the writing process. A Martlew, M. (Ed.):The Psychology of Written Language.Nueva York: John Wiley and Sons.
11.
EmigJ. (1971). The Composing Process of Twelfth Graders. (Research Report n. 13). Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
12.
FlaniganM.MenéndezD. S. (1980). Perception and change: Teaching revision.College English, 43(3), 256–266.
13.
FlowerL.HayesJ. R. (1980). Writing as a problem solving.Visible Language14, 4, 388–399.
14.
FlowerL.HayesJ.R. (1981). The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem.College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32.
15.
FormanE. A.CazdenC. B. (1984). Perspectivas vygotskianas en la educación: el valor cognitivo de la interacción entre iguales.Infancia y Aprendizaje, 27–28, 139–157.
16.
FreedmanS. W. (Ed.) (1985). The Acquisition of Written Language. Response and Revision.Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
17.
García DebancC. (1984). Une évaluation formative en pédagogie de l'écriture.Pratiques, 44, 21–52.
18.
García DebancC.MasM. (1987). Evaluation des productions écrites. A Chiss, J.-L., et al. (Ed.):Apprendre/Enseigner à produire des textes écrits.Bruxelles: De Boeck, 133–145.
19.
GereA. R.StevensR. S. (1985). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision.A freedmanS. W. (Ed.): The Acquisition of Written Language.Norwood, NJ.: Ablex, 85–105.
20.
GravesD. H. (1979). What children show us about revision.Language Arts, 55, 393–399.
21.
GravesD. H. (1983). Writing. Teachers and Children at Work. Portsmouth, NH.: Heinemann. (Trad, castellana: Didáctica de la escritura.Madrid: MEC/Morata.)
22.
HayesJ. R.FlowerL. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing process. A Gregg, L.W., y Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.), Cognitive Processes in Writing.Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 3–30.
23.
HillocksG. (1986). Research on Written Composition. New Directions for Teaching.Urbana, Ill.: National Conference on Research in English.
24.
MatsuhashiA. (1982). Explorations in the real-time production of written discourse.A nystrandM. (Ed.): What Writers Know.Nueva York: Academic Press, 269–290.
25.
MatsuhashiA. (Ed.) (1987a). Writing in Real Time.Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
26.
MatsuhashiA. (1987b). Revising the plan and altering the text.A matsuhashiA. (Ed.): Writing in Real Time.Norwood, NJ.: Ablex, 197–223.
27.
MatsuhashiA.GordonE. (1985). Revision, addition, and the power of the unseen text.A freedmanS. W. (Ed.): The Acquisition of Written Language.Norwood, NJ.: Ablex, 226–249.
28.
MurrayD. M. (1978). Internal revision: A process of discovery. EnCooperC.R.OdellL. (eds.), Reseach on Composing: Points of Departure.Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 85–103.
29.
PerlS. (1979). The composing process of unskilled college writers.Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317–356.
30.
PiazzaC. L. (1987). Identiying context variable in research on writing.Written Communication, 4(2), 107–137.
31.
PiankoS. H. (1979). A description of the composing processes of college freshman writers.Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 5–22.
32.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC. (1983). The development of evaluative diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children's composing.A martlewM. (Ed.): The Psychology of Written Composition, Nueva York: John Wiley and Sons.
33.
SommersN. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers.College Composition and Communication, 31, 378–388.
34.
SommersN. (1982). Responding to student writing.College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 148–156.
35.
StallardL. M. (1974). Analysis of the writing behavior of good student writters.Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 206–218.
36.
WitteS. P. (1985). Revising, composing theory, and research desing.A freedmanS. W. (Ed.): The Acquisition of Written Language.Norwood, NJ.: Ablex, 250–285.
