Se presenta en este trabajo un informe preliminar de una investigación longitudinal en la que las ideas evolutivo-educativas son evaluadas a lo largo del tiempo y se ponen en relación con las interacciones que 70 parejas (maridos y esposas) desarrollan con sus hijos de alrededor de 22 meses en situaciones diversas; se analiza también la relación con la estructuración del entorno físico y social del hogar, así como con el desarrollo del niño. Se han encontrado relaciones positivas entre las diferentes clases de padres definidos por sus ideas y las variables dependientes examinadas (contenidos de las interacciones, estimulación del hogar, desarrollo del niño).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BayleyN. (1969). Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development.New York: The Psychological Corporation. (traducción castellana, Madrid: TEA, 1977).
2.
BradleyR. H.CaldwellB. M.ElardoR. (1979). Home environment and cognitive development in the first two years: a cross-lag panel analysis.Developmental Psychology, 15, 246–250.
3.
BrunerJ. S. (1981). Vygotski: una perspectiva histórica y conceptual.Infancia y Aprendizaje, 14, 3–17.
4.
CaldwellB. Y.BradleyR. H. (1984). Home Observation for Measurement of the Evironment. Universidad de Arkansas en Little Rock.
5.
EasterbrooksM. A.GoldbergW. A. (1984). Toddler development in the family: Impact of father involvement and parenting characteristics.Child Development, 55, 740–752.
6.
LautreyJ. (1980). Classe social, milieu familial et intelligence.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Trad, cast.: Clase social, medio familiar e inteligencia, Madrid: Aprendizaje-Visor, 1985).
7.
LuckenhausP. (1984). Pleasure derived from mastery in three year olds: its function for persistence and the influence of maternal behavior.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 7, 343–358.
8.
SiguelI. E. (1970). The distancing hypothesis: a causal hypothesis for the acquisition of representational thought. EnJonesM. R. (Ed.), Miami Symposium of Prediction of Behavior, 1968: Effect of early experiences (pp. 99–118). Coral Gables, F. L.: University of Miami Press.
9.
SigelI. E. (1981). Social experience in the development of representational thought: Distancing theory. EnSigelI. E.BrodzinskyD.GolinkoffR. (Eds.), New directions in Piagetian theory and practice.Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
10.
SigelI. E.McgillicuddyDclissiA. V. (1984). Prents as teachers of their children. A distancing behavior model. EnPellegriniA.YawkeyT. (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts.Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.
11.
SigelI. E. (1986). Reflections on the belief-behavior connection: Lessons learned from a research program on parental belief systems and teaching strategies. EnAshmoreR. D.BrodzinskyD. M. (Eds.), Thinking about the family: Views of parents and children.Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
12.
SigelI. E.Mcgilucuddy-DclisiA. V.JohnsonJ. E. (1980). Parenteral distancing, beliefs and children's representational competence within the family context.Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.
13.
SkinnerE. A. (1986). The origins of young children's perceived control: mother contingent and sensitive behavior.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 359–382.
14.
StevensJ. H.BakemanR. (1985). A factor analytic study of the HOME Scale for Infants.Developmental Psychology, 21, 1.196–1.203.
15.
WertschJ. W. (1984). The zone of proximal development: some conceptual issues. EnRogoffB.WertschJ. W. (Eds.), Children's learning in the «zone of proximal development».San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
WoodD. J. (1980). Teaching the young children: some relations between social interaction, language and thought. EnOlsonD. R. (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought.New York: Norton.
17.
WoodD. J.BrunerJ. S.RossG. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.
18.
WoodD. J.MiddletonD. (1975). A study of assisted problem-solving.British Journal of Psychology, 66, 181–191.
