El propósito de este trabajo es comparar los procesos implicados en la lectura oral y en la lectura silenciosa, teniendo en cuenta factores tales como la edad de los sujetos, (se trabaja con individuos de 2.°, 4.° y 6.° cursos de E. G. B.), y el propósito o intención con la que se lee. Se emplean tests tipo «cloze», en los que los sujetos tienen que completar (predecir) los espacios en blanco del texto. Las puntuaciones se obtienen del análisis de los errores cometidos en ambos tipos de lectura, según un método derivado del de Goodman y Burke (1973); como medidas se toman la comprensión lectora y la velocidad de lectura. Por último, se ofrecen una serie de conclusiones respecto a los tipos de lectura, respecto al procedimiento de evaluación y respecto a las medidas utilizadas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-DahiryS. A.HeermanCh. E.«Literal-Inferential Comprehension Achievement in the Modes of Listening, Oral Reading and Silent Reading», Reading Improvement, 1981, 18, (2), 110–114.
2.
AmorosoH. C.A psycholinguistic analysis of the oral and silent reading performance of selected standard IV subject in Trinidad and Tobago. West Indies. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Wisconsin-Madison, 1978.
3.
ArtolaT.Análisis de los errores en la lectura oral. Memoria de licenciatura. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1983.
4.
AullsM. W.Qualitative analysis of reading? Why bothers? Comunicación presentada en el Consejo Nacional de Lectura, 1979 b.
5.
AullsM. W.MacleanM. QASOR: «Qualitative Analysis of Silent and Oral Reading Behaviors». Artículo no publicado, 1978.
6.
BeebeM. J.«The effect of different types of substitution miscues on reading», Reading Research Quarterly, 1980, 15(3), 324–326.
7.
BlusteinE. S.Reading as a psycholinguistic process: A study of the relationship between problem solving and oral reading strategies in sixth-grade children. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Columbia Teachers College, 1977.
8.
BormuthJ. R.«Factor validity of cloze test as measures of reading comprehension ability», Reading Research Quarterly, 1969, IV, 350–365.
9.
CambourneB.Some psycholinguistic dimensions of the silent reading process: A pilot study. Comunicación presentada en la Reunión de la Conferencia Australiana sobre Lectura. Melbourne, 1977.
10.
CambourneB.BrennanR. «Coping with cloze: A study of how pupils of different levels of reading proficiency process in complete texts». Artículo no publicado. Universidad de Wollongong, 1982.
11.
CokeEE.UU..: «The effect of readability on oral and silent reading rate», Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66(3), 406–409.
12.
ConradR.«The effect of vocalizing on comprehension in the profoundly deaf», British Journal of Psychology, 1971, 62(2), 147–150.
13.
CunninghamJ. W.CaplanR. M.«Investigating the concurrent validity of miscue analysis as a measure of silent reading processes», Reading World, 1982, 21(4), 299–310.
14.
DoehringD. G.«Acquisition of rapid reading responses», Monographs of the Society for Research Development, 1976, 41,2, (165), 1–54.
15.
DolqueistM. E.A psycholinguistic study of oral reading and cloze responses of fourth-grade disabled readers, average second-grade readers, and average fourth-grade readers. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Kansas, 1976.
16.
EaganR.«An investigation into the relationship of the paussing phenomena in oral reading and reading comprehension», The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1975, 21(4), 278–288.
17.
ElgartD. D.«Oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension: A comparative study of learning disabled students with modality preferences. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Temple, 1979.
18.
FarrenS. N.A study of reading errors using Goodman's miscue analysis and cloze procedure. Comunicación presentada en la Reunión de la Asociación Irlandesa de Lectura (Dublin, Irlanda, 6–8, de octubre de 1977).
19.
GarabedianH.An investigation of the relative efficiency of silent and oral reading performance in grade 7., Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Connecticut, 1978.
20.
GhiotC.WlelemansL.«Vitesse de lecture et compréhension», Revue Belge de Psychologie et de Pedagogie, 1978, 40, (163–164), 81–94.
21.
GlennJ. C.A psycholinguistic analysis of the effect of silent and oral reading on the comprehension and oral reading miscues of average fourth-grade readers. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad del Sur de California, 1976.
22.
GoldmanS. R.HogaboamT. W.BellL. C.PerfettiC.A.«Short-term retention of discourse during reading», Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 72(5), 647–655.
23.
GoodmanK. S.«Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game», Journal of the Reading Specialist, 1967, 6, 126–235.
24.
GoodmanK. S.The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process. Universidad Estatal de Wayne, 1968.
25.
GoodmanK. S.«Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process», Journal of Typographic Research, 1970 b, 4, 103–110.
26.
GoodmanK. S.«Miscues: Windows of the reading process», enGoodmanK. S. (ed): Miscue Anaysis: Applications to reading Instruction.Urbana, III: Cámara de compensación de ERIC sobre Habilidades de Lectura y Comunicaciones, Consejo Nacional de Profesores de Inglés, 1973.
GoodmanK. S.GoodmanY. M.«Learning about psycholinguistic processes by analyzing oral reading», Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47(3), 317–333.
29.
HueyE. B.The psychology and the pedagogy of reading. Nueva York, MacMillan, 1908. (Reeditado por el M. I. T., Cambridge, Mass., 1968.)
30.
JuelC.HolmesB.Comparison of processing strategies in oral and silent reading by good and poor readers. Comunicación presentada a la Reunión Anual de la Asociación para la Investigación de la Educación Americana (Boston, MA. Abril, 7–11, 1980).
31.
JuelC.HolmesB.«Oral and silent reading of sentences», Reading Research Quarterly, 1981, 16(4), 545–568.
32.
KirkhamS. G.A comparison of silent reading, oral reading and listening comprehension of students in grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Wisconsin-Madison, 1977.
33.
KissJ. A.«A study of the ability of the second, fourth, and sixth grade children to-comprehend a temporaly reversed sintatic structure under aural, oral reading, and silent reading conditions», Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975, 36 (6A). 3516.
34.
LaytonJ. R.The psychology of learning to read. Academic Press Inc., 1979.
35.
LatourC.An exploratory study of the constructs underlying the progressive cloze assesment procedure. Comunicación para el grado Master de Educación en Lectura, Universidad Mc Gill, 1980.
36.
Loroy-BoussionA.«L'intériorisation de la lecture entre 5 et 8 ans», Journal de Psychologie Normal et Pathologique, 1964, 61(3), 295–312.
37.
LuriaA. R.The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior.Nueva York: Liveright Publishing Co., 1961.
38.
MacleanM.«QASOR: A framework for the qualitatively analyzing silent and oral reading», Language Arts, 1979, 276–282.
39.
MccormickC. M.The relationship between speed and accuracy of word recognition and literal comprehension in beginning readers. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Minnesota, 1977.
40.
MclaughlinG. H. «Reading at imposible speeds», Journal of Reading, 1969, 12, 449–454 y 502–510.
41.
MenascheL.Aspects of the reading process: Reading comprehension in adult (French) learners of the English as a foreign language: A comparison of reading aloud and silent reading. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Cambridge, 1977.
42.
MyersI. M.ParisS.«Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading», Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978, 70(5), 680–690.
43.
NewmanH.«Oral reading miscue analysis is good but not complete», The Reading Teacher, 1978, 31, 883–886.
44.
PageW. D.The Altercue Comprehension Technique. Universidad de Connecticut, 1982.
45.
RobertsonM.Psycholinguistic dimensions of the silent reading process. A comparison of silent and oral reading processes as measured by CLOZE technique on the C. R. A. P. test and the R. M. I. Estudio independiente, Diploma de Lenguaje de la Lectura, segundo semestre 1977.
46.
RowellE. H.«The relationship between silent and oral reading comprehension in grades three and five», Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975, 35 (11-A), 6946–6947.
47.
RowellE. H.«DO elementary students read better orally or silently?», The Reading Teacher, 1976, 29(4), 367–370.
48.
SmithH. K.«The responses of good and poors readers when asked to read for different purposes», Reading Research Quarterly, 1967, 3, 53–83.
49.
TaylorW. L.«Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability», Journalism Quarterly, 1953,30, 415–433.
50.
TaylorN. E.ConnorU.«Silent versus oral reading: the rational instructional use of both processes», Reading Teacher, 1982, 35(4), 440–443.
51.
ThorndikeE. L.«Reading as reasoning: A study of the mistakes in paragraph reading», Journal of Educational Psychology, 1917, 8, 323–332.
ZinckR.An investigation of semantic and syntatic language cues utilized during oral and silent reading. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Georgia, 1977.
