National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (Washington: USCC, 1995).
2.
WildesKevin, “A Memo from the Central Office: The ‘Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services’,”Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal5 (1995) 133–140.
3.
GallagherJohn, “The Ecclesiology of the U.S. Bishops’ 1994 Health Care Directives,”Review for Religious55 (1996) 230–248.
4.
For further insight, he refers us to Yves Congar, Lay People in the Church, trans. Donald Attwater (London: Bloomsbury Publishing Co., 1957); MurnionPhilip, “The Next Steps for the Laity,”Origins25.2 (1995) 28–32; Ladislas Orsy, “Structures for the Vision,” America 173 (7 October 1995) 10–15.
5.
From DullesAvery, Models of the Church (New York: Doubleday,1974).
6.
On advanced directives see my “Living Wills” The Tablet (September 17, 1994) 1157–1159.
7.
See Veritatis Splendor31–35, 59–65.
8.
See the important essays, JohnT. Noonan, “Development in Moral Doctrine,” and Thomas Kopfensteiner, “Science, Metaphor and Moral Casuistry,” in The Text of CasuistryKeenanJames, and ShannonThomas, eds. (Washington, D. C: Georgetown UP, 1995) 198–204 and 207–220, respectively.
9.
On the question of the principle and ectopic pregnancy, see my “The Function of the Principle of Double Effect” Theological Studies54 (1993) 294–315.
10.
See, for instance, TuoheyJohn, “The Implications of the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services on the Clinical Practice of Resolving Ectopic Pregnancies,”Louvain Studies20 (1995) 41–57.