Abstract
Although one thinks of health economics as a relatively new area, the first studies in applying economic evaluation to healthcare were in the mid-1960s. Requirements for economic studies for reimbursement purposes are growing internationally, with Ireland joining the ‘band’ this year and Holland in 2003. Although this is a rapidly expanding area, there is still a significant number of issues to address in terms of the use of such economic assessments by local healthcare decision makers. Little appears to be known about this area; this paper, in part, presents a brief literature review. The literature suggests that, among other things, clinicians are suspicious of the cost-containment motive around this agenda and of industry sponsorship, that there is a lack of good effectiveness information available to local decision makers, and that significant barriers remain in place at a local level to the effective use of such information. In England and Wales, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) has brought cost-effectiveness to the fore, not just efficacy. It is interesting to note that a significant amount of the research is UK-focused. This paper does not attempt to examine the latest on economic evaluation methodology (it is written by a non-health economist) but attempts to draw out some lessons from this review for supplier industries, particularly the pharmaceutical industry.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
