Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Plasmin, the principal downstream product of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), is known for its potent fibrin-degrading capacity but is also recognized for many non-fibrinolytic activities. Curiously, plasmin has not been conclusively linked to blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption during recombinant tPA (rtPA)-induced thrombolysis in ischemic stroke. This is surprising given the substantial involvement of tPA in the modulation of BBB permeability and the co-existence of tPA and plasminogen in both blood and brain throughout the ischemic event. Here, we review the work that argues a role for plasmin together with endogenous tPA or rtPA in BBB alteration, presenting the overall controversy around the topic yet creating a rational case for an involvement of plasmin in this process.

Keywords

blood–brain barrier intracerebral hemorrhage plasmin stroke tPA thrombolysis

INTRODUCTION

Tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA)¹ is a protease classically appreciated for its ability to generate the serine-protease plasmin from its inactive precursor plasminogen. Plasmin in turn is recognized primarily for its fibrinolytic role.² The concept of tPA-mediated plasminogen activation was harnessed for clinical development over 30 years ago³ and is still the mainstay for thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.^4,5 Nevertheless, the clinical use of human recombinant tPA (rtPA) in stroke is restricted owing to the enhanced risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH),^4–6 even within the first 90 minutes post-stroke onset,⁷ and reduced clinical efficacy at longer time frames (>4.5 hours).⁷

To further complicate matters, tPA is also endogenously expressed in the extravascular compartment,^8,9 most notably in the CNS^8,10–12 where it performs a number of critical non-fibrinolytic functions.^13–16 Within this context, while much effort has been devoted to understanding how endogenous tPA and rtPA modulate neuronal function,^14,15 another major avenue whereby tPA can influence the CNS is via alteration of the blood–brain barrier (BBB).^13,16 Mechanistically, the majority of reports suggested that tPA increases BBB permeability in a plasmin-independent manner; however, the role of plasmin may be underestimated and is accompanied by much contradicting data (summarized in Table 1). It is the purpose of this article to outline the evidence that links plasmin to tPA-dependent alteration of neurovascular permeability, with particular focus on the controversy surrounding the topic. We hypothesize that under certain circumstances, especially when vascular plasminogen and rtPA are simultaneously available around brain tissue, enhanced in situ generation of plasmin may cause substantial damage to the BBB.

Table 1.

Central controversies surrounding plasmin involvement in BBB modulation

General	In detail
Overlapping mechanisms	Key tPA-dependent mechanisms for BBB breakdown are reported as plasmin independent, but plasmin can perform complementary or parallel actions
Inconsistent result in experimental stroke models in vivo	Intravenous administration of plasmin is safer with regards to ICH compared with PAs Different results are obtained depending on the mode of plasmin administration (systemic versus local; with versus without PA) Contradicting observations in plasminogen knockout mice
Inconsistent or preliminary result in cell culture in vitro	Protective as well as deleterious effects of plasmin are seen in cultured cells of the BBB (e.g., endothelial cells and astrocytes) Established plasmin-dependent observations in culture are not yet backed up by solid in vivo studies
Inhibition	Can plasmin overcome the tight control of its robust brain and blood inhibitors, even during thrombolysis?

BBB, blood–brain barrier; ICH, intraceretbral hemorrhage; PA, plasminogen activator; tPA, tissue-type plasminogen activator.

TISSUE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR AND THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER

Over the last decade, much literature accumulated regarding the ability of tPA to interact with the BBB. The following section will summarize this sizable body of work while distinguishing the effects of rtPA from endogenous tPA, the clinical versus experimental data and observations made under naïve or ischemic conditions. The various mechanisms suggested thus far, the different approaches to tackle the issue as well as common limitations accompanying the use of rtPA in animal models will also be discussed.

Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator and the Nonischemic Blood–Brain Barrier

Most thrombolysis-related symptomatic ICH (sICH) in stroke occurs within 24–36 hours post treatment within the infarct core, suggesting that ischemia itself has a role in its etiology (sICH beyond 36 hours is not considered tPA-related).^6,17 Interestingly, 20% of rtPA-associated sICH cases take place outside the anatomic infarct site (i.e., in non-affected brain areas)^17,18 and cerebral bleeding complications were also observed after rtPA administration for myocardial infarction¹⁹ (we note, however, that an underlying cerebrovascular injury was not thoroughly evaluated in these myocardial infarction cases). Hence, rtPA-associated bleeding in patients may not be fully explained by weakening of cerebral blood vessels due to the stroke.

In line with this notion, recent reports, albeit in rats, have demonstrated that intraarterial (2–4 mg/kg)²⁰ or intravenous^21,22 administration of rtPA or catalytically inactive rtPA²¹ (1 mg/kg) into naïve animals mediated rapid opening of the BBB within 1–4 hours (as evidenced by accumulation of Evans blue-labelled albumin in the brain parenchyma), indicating that vascularly originated rtPA may influence the healthy brain endothelium, perhaps independent of its catalytic activity. In contrast, others could not reproduce these observations in uninjured rats (using fluorescent dextran),²³ although this particular study showed that rtPA itself could cross the intact BBB via transcytosis and exacerbate neuronal injury (see section Exposure of the Blood–Brain Barrier to Plasmin During Stroke and Thrombolysis). Moreover, no increase in albumin extravasation²⁴ or hemorrhage²⁵ was reported in naive mice receiving intravenously mouse rtPA²⁴ or rtPA,²⁵ respectively, even when given at 10 mg/kg (see below). Instead, the BBB of naïve mice was permeated by Evans blue only when exogenous tPA was injected intracerebroventricularly (~0.02 to 0.6 μg),^24,26 bypassing the intact BBB and acting preferentially on astrocytes.^24,27 Taken together, and despite prominent discrepancies between species and different research groups, these experiments highlight an ability of rtPA to act in vivo, in healthy conditions, on the luminal (endothelial) as well as the abluminal (astrocytic; cerebral) compartments of the neurovascular unit (NVU). It is worth distinguishing, however, that while vascular rtPA may promote extravasation of blood proteins through the uninjured BBB, it has not been shown to trigger ICH in any naïve rodent. Hence, it is tempting to speculate that rtPA has only limited capacity to impact the healthy BBB.

Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator and the Ischemic Blood–Brain Barrier; Observations, Resolutions and Experimental Limitations

A number of clinical studies provided magnetic resonance imaging-based evidence for rtPA-related BBB disruption,^28,29 which also correlated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic transformation²⁸ during thrombolysis in stroke, strongly suggesting a causal relation between rtPA and BBB breakdown in the ischemic human brain. Curiously, however, a recent meta-analysis of the largest clinical stroke trials employing rtPA-based thrombolysis found no support for the hypothesis that the incidence and risk of sICH by rtPA increase with the time from onset to treatment (evaluated up to onset to treatment ≦6 hours),⁷ despite the likely deterioration of the BBB under prolonged ischemia. Nevertheless, an apparent lower rate of sICH was observed with onset to treatment ≦90 minutes, but a lack of events in the placebo group prevented evaluation of risk at this early time window. Also apparent was a significant increase in the risk of total rtPA-related hemorrhagic events (symptomatic and non-symptomatic) with onset to treatment > 180 minutes, but the absolute rates of hemorrhage were similar (30% to 35%).⁷ Hence, the degree to which rtPA-induced BBB impairment contributes to the higher risk of sICH carried by the treatment (~5-fold⁷ to 10-fold^4,5) remains controversial.

Evidence for rtPA-mediated BBB disruption emerges also from animal studies, but observations dramatically vary between gyrencephalic species like primates, which possess distinct advantages for human stroke simulation,³⁰ compared with small animal models of stroke. In addition, the stroke model itself (e.g., thrombotic versus mechanical occlusion) has a bearing on the outcome of thrombolysis. For instance, in a non-human primate model, where middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) is achieved by balloon compression, administration of rtPA (up to 10 mg/kg) within 3.5 hours post-stroke onset did not increase the incidence or severity of ICH (later administration of rtPA was not examined).³¹ In contrast, rtPA infusion (3.3 mg/kg) 1 hour post embolic stroke in rabbits was sufficient to increase the ICH rate,³² indicating a high sensitivity of the rabbit to rtPA-dependent bleeding in these settings.

While limited in their ability to model human disease, numerous studies using MCAo and embolic stroke models in rodents, either relying on endogenous tPA²⁶ or administering rtPA (up to 10 mg/kg),^{20,21,24,25,33–41} demonstrated that tPA can compromise the BBB. Indeed, treatment with rtPA, particularly beyond 3 hours of stroke onset (but in some cases earlier²⁵), is often accompanied by increased BBB permeability,^20,21,33,34 enhanced hemorrhagic transformation,^{25,32,34–40} degradation of basement membrane (BM) and tight junction (TJ) proteins,^25,34,38,40 greater edema,^33,34,36 and aggravated neurologic deficits.^21,40

Accordingly, strategies aiming to protect the BBB from rtPA-mediated damage and reduce thrombolysis-associated ICH were put forward, including blockade of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs),^32,41 free-radical scavenging,^37,38,42 inhibition of intracellular enzymes like phosphodiesterase-III,³⁶ Rho-kinase (ROCK)^35,43 or poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase,⁴⁰ blockade of surface receptors such as LDL receptors (LDLRs)^26,39,43 or the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor-α²⁴ and employment of activated protein C,²⁵ plasminogen-activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)-derived peptides^21,44 or progesterone.³⁴ While results of these substantial efforts in experimental models seemed promising, no agent has been clinically implemented thus far in conjunction with rtPA to protect the BBB during thrombolysis.

Noteworthy caveats often accompany murine experiments examining the effects of rtPA on the BBB during stroke. First, the use of (human) rtPA in the rodent creates a considerable dilemma, as human tPA, whereas conserved (shares 81% homology with its mouse counterpart⁴⁵), is altered in crucial sequences, including the docking site for PAI-1,²¹ its main physiologic inhibitor.² In addition, the activation rate of murine plasminogen by human tPA is 5- to 10-fold lower than in an autologous system,⁴⁶ resulting in poorer capacity of human tPA to lyse murine cross-linked clots.⁴⁷ Therefore, a rtPA dose of 10 mg/kg is commonly used in rodents as a compensatory measure^{24,25,33,35–41} compared with the clinical dose of 0.9 mg/kg. This exposes the murine system to suprapharmacological plasma concentrations of rtPA (typically in the low nanomolar range during thrombolysis in humans⁴⁸), potentially exaggerating the amplitude of non-fibrinolytic actions of rtPA (like induced production of MMPs and BBB impairment) and causing overestimation of their pathophysiological relevance. However, efficient tPA-induced opening of the rodent BBB has been demonstrated with lower rtPA dosing regimens (1 to 6 mg/kg^20,21,34), reducing the likelihood of a complete artefactual effect.

A final issue relates to the formulation buffer (or ‘vehicle’) of rtPA, containing vast quantities of L-arginine and phosphoric acid, as well as non-anionic detergent (polysorbate (Tween) 80), shown to possess brain-related activities.⁴⁹ Many studies do not dialyze rtPA before use or do not use its formulation buffer as an essential control.^{20–22,33–38,44} This is an important issue, particularly when a dose of 10 mg/kg is employed, as the rodent is exposed to ~11-fold more concentrated vehicle than humans. Taken together, while the flux of experimental data in rodents incriminates rtPA with regards to BBB impairment during stroke, one has to carefully examine the above parameters and consider fundamental conflicts with data from primate stroke models³¹ to reach a more balanced conclusion.

The Role of Endogenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator

A recent stroke study has shown that the infarct volume in humans and (female) mice as well as the extent of BBB damage in the latter was inversely correlated with age.⁵⁰ Curiously, tPA activity and messenger RNA levels also declined in the mouse brain with aging (but not in the spinal cord and plasma; measurements that could not be performed in brains of healthy humans), raising the hypothesis that endogenous tPA levels may impact the severity of stroke also clinically.⁵⁰

Nevertheless, this notion is not supported experimentally in the non-human primate, as tPA activity and antigen levels actually decreased or remained unchanged, respectively, 1 to 2 hours post MCAo in baboons. Instead, upregulation of uPA, uPA receptor, PAI-1, and tPA-PAI-1 complex (measured in the basal ganglia and in plasma)^51,52 and loss of microvascular laminin (indicative of BBB damage)⁵² were observed.

Unlike its expression profile in the primate brain, a direct contribution of endogenous tPA to BBB damage in murine stroke models was demonstrated either by tPA inhibition with its brain-specific inhibitor, neuroserpin²⁶ (that also reduces infarct volume⁵³), or in mice deficient of tPA,^26,27 both associated with preservation of BBB integrity during 6 hours permanent MCAo. Importantly, mice lacking plasminogen, urokinase (uPA) or matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 were not protected from BBB disruption in this permanent stroke model, suggesting that the effect was unique to endogenous tPA, but not to other naturally occurring plasminogen activators (PAs), and was not solely dependent on plasmin and MMP-9.²⁶ Temporally, endogenous tPA antigen and activity is often (but not always⁵⁴) shown to be transiently upregulated in the ischemic rodent brain, appearing early (within 1 to 6 hours post-stroke onset)^26,53,55 around the vessel wall^26,53 and promptly declining,⁵³ yet correlating with rapid degradation of the BM.⁵³ In partial agreement with observations in primates,⁵¹ uPA (but not tPA) levels increase continuously also in the injured rodent brain for days after injury,⁵³ suggesting that endogenous tPA has only a limited role in the acute phase of the ischemic event. Intriguingly, formation of tPA-PAI-1 complex was recently highlighted in mice as an important factor responsible for BBB breakdown instead of active tPA itself (below).⁵⁶ Hence, it can be speculated that PAI-1 levels may in fact determine the capacity of endogenous tPA to affect the BBB. Collectively, despite the elegant work in the transgenic murine models, further studies are clearly required to ascertain how endogenous tPA contributes to BBB breakdown during stroke, especially with relevance to the human condition.

Modes of Action

Mechanistically, most major pathways linking tPA to modulation of BBB permeability were shown to be plasmin independent (Table 2). One of the leading hypotheses postulates that in the later hours of ischemic stroke (≥3 hours of onset) endogenous tPA or rtPA given during thrombolysis induce an increase in levels of MMP-9 and MMP-3 (in addition to the induction of MMP-2 and -9 by the ischemia itself).¹³ In turn, MMPs degrade TJ proteins and components of the BM and contribute to BBB impairment, vasogenic edema and hemorrhagic transformation^13,57,58 (Figure 1). To further support this, numerous stroke studies confirmed that (1) administration of rtPA increases MMP-9 levels in human^13,59 and rodent brains,^25,38,60,61 (2) that the increase in MMP-9 levels is milder in tPA-knockout mice compared with their wild-type counterparts^26,60,62,63 and can be restored by reconstitution of rtPA⁶⁰ or mouse tPA⁶³ into tPA^−/– mice and that (3) intracortical injection of neuroserpin into the ischemic area of a wild-type mouse prevents MMP-9 induction.²⁶ Furthermore, the increase in MMP-9 levels in rats was not reduced by co-treatment of tranexamic acid together with rtPA⁶⁰ and was also maintained in plasminogen^−/– mice during MCAo,²⁶ suggestive of a plasmin-independent process. Mechanistically, tPA signaling via LDLR-related protein-1 (LRP-I)^25,26,62 was reported to drive the enhanced production of MMP-9, mainly in brain endothelial cells (BECs),^25,37,62 but also in microglia⁶³ and astrocytes (the later shown only in vitro).⁶⁴ Almost identical observations, albeit plasmin-related,⁴¹ were reported with regards to MMP-3, which was upregulated in BECs in a LRP-1 dependent process in vitro³⁹ and was associated with augmented ICH after treatment with rtPA in stroke in vivo.⁴¹

Figure 1.

Proposed integrated model for tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA)- and plasminogen (Plgn)-mediated modulation of blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability during thrombolysis in ischemic stroke. (A) In brain endothelial cells (BECs), tPA engages low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-related protein 1 (LRP-1) (upregulated by the ischemic insult³⁹) and activates surface-bound plasminogen^119,126 into plasmin (Pin). LRP-1 binding by tPA signals BECs to produce and secrete matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3³⁹ and -g.^25,26,62 Plasmin activates these MMPs,^97–99 which in turn degrade tight junctions (TJs), increasing the paracellular permeability in a process boosted by the ischemic damage to TJs. A flux of vascular tPA, plasminogen, plasmin, and activated MMPs then flows through the broken TJs and also arrives from within the injured brain, localizing on the basolateral BEC membrane, where plasmin continues to form. Subsequently, plasmin and the MMPs degrade the basement membrane (BM),^42,69,94,95 causing loss of BEC adhesion^126,128 and substantial damage to the BBB. In addition, plasmin also cleaves monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1),¹⁵⁰ an event that enhances the ability of MCP-1 to initiate Rho-kinase (ROCK) and ezrin–radixin–moesin (ERM) signaling via its receptor C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2).¹² Activation of the ROCK and ERM pathways results in modulation of the actin cytoskeleton¹²² and BEC retraction,^{43,119,126–128} further enhancing TJs damage and exposure of the BM to plasmin and MMPs. Thus, the MCP-1 pathway initiates a positive feedback loop for additional loss of BEC adherence, ultimately leading to cell death and BBB impairment. (B) In astrocytes, specific tPA-mediated plasmin generation on the glial surface triggers a dual tPA-plasmin signaling events.⁴³ These include tPA-induced cleavage and shedding of LRP-1,²⁷ which initiates LRP-1-dependent signal, and also plasmin-mediated activation of the ROCK pathway,⁴³ potentially via engagement of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1).^103,142 LRP-1 signaling and ROCK activation in turn cause modulation of the actin cytoskeleton,⁴³ morphology changes and end-feet retraction in astrocytes,^{24,27,38,42,43,142} leading to disruption of the BBB. Tissue-type plasminogen activator also activates platelet-derived growth factor C (PDGF-CC), which signals to astrocytes via the PDGF receptor-α (PDGFRα) to impair the BBB.²⁴ It is plausible that plasmin, known for its ability to process PDGF-CC,^91,92 may possess a similar capacity to initiate PDGF-CC-dependent BBB disruption, but this remains to be formally demonstrated.

Table 2.

Key molecular mechanisms for tPA- and plasmin-dependent BBB opening during stroke

tPA-dependent pathways
Cell type	tPA effect/consequence for BBB	Established in vivo	Reported contribution of plasmin
BECs^25,62 and microglia⁶³	LRP-1 -mediated induction of MMP-2 and MMP-9/degradation of TJs and BM proteins^25,62,63	Yes⁶⁰	No
BECs	LRP-1-mediated induction of MMP-3/degradation of TJs and BM proteins	Yes⁴¹	Likely^41,98
BECs³⁵ and astrocytes⁶⁴	ROCK activation/induction of MMP-2^35,64 and MMP-9³⁵	Yes³⁵	Possible¹²²
Astrocytes	LRP-1-shedding/retraction of astrocytic end-feet from vessel wall	Yes²⁷	No
Astrocytes	Oxidative stress damage/retraction of astrocytic end-feet from vessel wall³⁸	Yes³⁸	Possible⁴²
Astrocytes	PDGF-CC activation/retraction of astrocytic end-feet from vessel wall²⁴	Yes²⁴	No
Astrocytes and/or	LRP-1-dependent, tPA:PAI-1 complex-mediated induction of MMP-3/increase in	Yes⁵⁶	No
microglia	extravasation of plasma proteins to the brain⁵⁶
Monocytes	ROS- and ERK1/2-dependent breakdown of TJs/increased BBB permeability¹⁵³	Partially¹⁵³	No
Smooth-muscle cells	LRP-1-dependent regulation of vascular tone (PAI-1-inhibitable)^65,66	Yes^21,65	Possible¹²³

Plasmin-dependent pathways
Cell type	Plasmin effect/consequence for BBB	Established in vivo	Reported PA involved
BECs	Activation of MMP-2 and -9/degradation of TJs and BM proteins^96,97,99 Partially⁴²	tPA^25,61
BECs	Activation of MMP-3/Degradation of TJs and BM proteins⁹⁸ Yes⁴¹	tPA⁴¹
BECs	BEC retraction/exposure of the BM to degradation; apoptosis^{43,119,126,127}	No	tPA, uPA^43,126
BECs	Cleavage of MCP-1 and activation of ROCK and ERM/contraction of BECs¹²²	Partially¹²²	tPA¹²²
Astrocytes	Oxidative stress damage/retraction of astrocytic end-feet from vessel wall⁴²	Yes⁴²	tPA?⁴²
Astrocytes	ROCK activation/deleterious morphologic changes⁴³	No	tPA essential⁴³
BECs and Astrocytes	PAR-1 cleavage/effects vary^123,125,142	No	Non-specific (streptokinase¹⁴²)

BECs, brain endothelial cells; BM, basement membrane; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; ERM, ezrin–radixin–moesin; LRP1, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MMP, matrix metalloproteinases; PAI1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; PAR-1, proteinase-activated receptor 1; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; ROCK, Rho-kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TJ, tight junction.

Other major pathways for BBB disruption by tPA (and rtPA) originate from the abluminal (i.e., brain-facing) compartment of the NVU,^24,26 where tPA triggers harmful, plasmin-independent signaling in astrocytes by direct cleavage of LRP-1 at the astrocyte end-feet²⁷ and by activation of latent PDGF-CC, rendering it a PDGF receptor α-agonist.²⁴ These events are associated with astrocyte swelling and edema formation, accompanied by detachment of astrocyte end-feet from the BM and further permeation of the BBB^24,27,38 (Figure 1) (refer to Simard et al⁵⁸ for review of molecular mechanisms underlying brain edema formation). Additional and perhaps less characterized mechanisms, both not requiring plasmin, involve tPA control of vascular tone⁶⁵ via activation of smooth-muscle cells⁶⁶ and a PAI-1-dependent mechanism described in traumatic brain injury, where signaling of the tPA-PAI-1 complex via LDLRs promotes MMP-3 production in the injured brain.⁵⁶

Despite the dominance of the plasmin-independent concept, plasminogen, the ultimate tPA substrate, is essentially present with tPA in both blood and brain under most pathologic brain scenarios, especially together with rtPA during its utilization in stroke. Furthermore, as discussed below, many actions of plasmin mirror or complement the activities of tPA associated with BBB disruption. Therefore, can plasmin truly be excluded from tPA-associated BBB alteration, particularly during thrombolysis?

IS THERE A CASE FOR PLASMIN AT THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER?

The role of plasminogen and plasmin is well cemented in the context of physiologic neurobiology or pathologic neurodegeneration, affecting neuronal sprouting,⁶⁷ neuronal plasticity,⁶⁸ or extracellular matrix-related neuronal death,⁶⁹ respectively. Moreover, plasmin was implicated in microglial activation⁷⁰ and received attention for its direct contribution to brain parenchymal damage during excitotoxic injury.¹⁰ Plasmin-associated brain damage was also inferred in models of ICH (where plasminogen potentiates thrombin-induced neurotoxicity)⁷¹ and potentially in stroke.^72,73 This evidence strongly links plasmin to brain function and dysfunction.

Based on the NVU concept (i.e., the tight coupling between neuronal metabolic demands and their supplying capillaries), one might also expect plasmin to serve as a BBB effector. This notion, however, is not always experimentally supported; indeed, early during focal cerebral ischemia (within 2 hours of stroke) in non-human primates, there is evidence of simultaneous neuronal injury and vascular damage (when microvascular integrin loss intensifies toward the ischemic core).⁷⁴ Yet, in more functional rodent studies neurotoxicity and BBB alteration have been described as distinguishable processes, particularly during early ischemic^75,76 or excitotoxic⁷⁷ brain injury. Therefore, the established involvement of plasmin in neuronal pathology might not fully extrapolate to the BBB and the subject requires much finer examination.

Exposure of the Blood–Brain Barrier to Plasmin During Stroke and Thrombolysis

Upon thrombolysis for cerebral ischemic attack, substantial circulating amounts of active rtPA (up to ~50 nmol/L during myocardial infarction with a similar dosing regimen to ischemic stroke^48,78), as well as plasminogen (2 μmol/L; the physiologic plasma concentration²) and in situ-generated plasmin (in some cases up to ~300 nmol/L⁷⁹) perfuse the brain. This ‘cocktail’ immediately comes in contact and interacts with BECs. According to studies using rodent models as well as bovine endothelial cells, vascular rtPA can then cross the intact BBB in a LRP-1-mediated transcytosis²³ and penetrate into the uninjured brain parenchyma. Under experimental ischemia, rtPA transport via the injured BBB increases and becomes LDLR independent⁸⁰ (to the best of our knowledge these rtPA properties have not been evaluated in humans and were not reported for plasminogen). Regardless of species, stroke affects the endothelial barrier and therefore provides an additional potential for both vascular rtPA and plasminogen to act upon the BM, pericytes and perivascular astrocytes and finally to provoke microglia and neurons. Notably, much higher local protease levels are expected as the enzymes rapidly accumulate on fibrin,^1,2 cells^2,81,82 and cell debris^83,84 Hence, ischemic stroke and thrombolysis conceptually set the perfect stage for an orchestrated rtPA and plasmin ‘storm’ from the vascular compartment, reaching all cerebral cell types but particularly the NVU.

Importantly, tPA^13,30 as well as plasminogen^10,85–87 are also endogenously expressed within the brain and, at least in rodents, are further upregulated during ischemic^26,55,73,88 and excitotoxic^10,89,90 insults (uPA is the predominant PA increased in the ischemic brain of non-human primates⁵¹). However, their spatial distributions only partially overlap. Tissue-type plasminogen activator is widely expressed in the brain endothelium as well as in microglia and neurons (in the case of the latter particularly in the hippocampus, hypothalamus, cerebellum, and amygdala),^13,30 whereas plasminogen is exclusively localized in rodent brains to neurons of the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and the cerebellum.^10,85–87 Hence, it should not be obviously assumed that brain-derived plasminogen is activated in situ by endogenous tPA at the BBB during stroke. Blood-derived plasminogen may be more readily available, but vascular-derived plasmin is also tightly controlled by the potent circulating plasmin inhibitor, α₂-antiplasmin (α₂AP). In fact, zymographies (either in situ casein zymography^8,26,54,73 or plasminogen–gelatin zymography⁵¹) or amidolytic activity assays⁵⁴ of the rodent brain, whether performed using naïve^8,54,73 or ischemic tissue,^26,51,54,73 cannot demonstrate any tPA or plasmin activity without inclusion of exogenous plasminogen in these assays. This is suggestive of either negligible levels or a very tight control of active endogenous plasmin in the vascular and extravascular compartments of the ischemic brain (without initiation of thrombolysis with rtPA). Questions are therefore raised whether (1) free plasmin is actually formed by endogenous PAs during stroke around brain capillaries and in brain parenchyma and (2) if it has a genuine capacity to operate uncontrollably and inflict BBB damage in the absence of an exogenous thrombolytic to force free plasmin formation.

Conceptual Links Between Plasmin Activity and Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption

Much of the plasmin-independent concept for the actions of tPA on the BBB derives from studies in plasminogen^−/– mice.²⁶ While compelling, not all of these reports are consistent⁴¹ (see section Experiments in Plasminogen Knockout Mice below). Importantly, a plasminogen-deficient approach mainly supports the existence of a plasmin-independent component in the action of tPA, but does not exclude an additional plasmin-dependent element. In fact, if substantial plasmin concentrations indeed build up around blood vessels in the brain, especially when plasmin levels rise in plasma during treatment with rtPA,⁷⁹ plasmin should logically contribute to BBB modulation, independently or in conjunction with rtPA. For example, plasmin efficiently cleaves PDGF-CC in vitro⁹¹ and in vivo (in the vitreous of patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy⁹²), suggesting that akin to tPA,²⁴ plasmin may be capable of playing a role in astrocyte-related BBB disruption via the PDGF-C pathway. Notably, PDGF-CC activation has not been directly evaluated in plasminogen^−/– mice and plasmin involvement was excluded circumstantially²⁴ based on the lack of plasmin contribution to BBB disruption in an earlier study.²⁶ Intriguingly, in a recent study that crossed transgenic mice overexpressing human PDGF-C with tPA-deficient mice, the phenotype of the PDGF-C overexpressing mouse was not affected (including high serum levels of cleaved growth factor and significant liver fibrosis), strongly suggesting that proteases other than tPA cleave and activate PDGF-C in vivo.⁹³

Plasmin can also directly degrade BM components such as collagen IV,^42,94 laminin⁶⁹ and fibronectin⁹⁵ and further activates in vitro^96–99 and in vivo^41,42,69 MMP-2, -3, and -9, which possess similar BM dismantling capabilities and additionally damage TJs.^13,57 Hence, pathologic plasmin activity may contribute to degradation of the microvascular bed and to impairment of vessel integrity, ultimately resulting in hemorrhagic transformation.¹⁰⁰ In solid support of this notion, recent work revealed that genetic ablation of the laminin-γ1 subunit in neurons and astrocytes disrupted astrocytic end-feet BM formation, consequently causing blood vessel disintegration and spontaneous hemorrhage in deep regions of the brain.¹⁰¹ One could speculate that plasmin degradation of laminin or other components of the BM could inflict a similar effect.

The overlapping capacity of plasmin and MMPs to degrade the extracellular matrix makes it difficult, however, to estimate the actual importance of plasmin in the BM degradation process in vivo. Some cues can be deduced from observations that double-knockout mice for MMP-2 and -9 demonstrated only partial (yet significant) protection against laminin loss and brain hemorrhage and had similar edema compared with wild-type mice after transient MCAo.¹⁰² In line with these observations, a broad MMP inhibitor (BB-94) did not fully block the hemorrhage rate in rabbits³² and rats⁶¹ undergoing rtPA treatment during embolic stroke. Suzuki et al⁴¹ has further demonstrated that both deficiencies in plasminogen and MMP-3 protected mice from rtPA-induced ICH, suggesting that plasmin may be required for activation of rtPA-regulated MMP-3 in endothelial cells³⁹ during stroke. Taken together, these observations circumstantially point to another protease(s), potentially plasmin, which operates in concert with MMPs to damage the BM during stroke. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to hypothesize that some other MMP-independent mechanisms may operate in parallel (see section Modes of Action above) and potentially contribute to this residual effect.

Plasmin (and plasminogen) additionally binds a wide array of cell-surface receptors or binding proteins and, utilizing its broad substrate specificity, cleaves a variety of biologic substrates.^81,82 Because of this capacity, plasmin has been implied in many cellular responses, including cell migration, wound healing, tissue remodeling, apoptosis, cancer invasion, cancer metastasis, inflammation and immunity (extensively reviewed elsewhere).^81,82,103 Importantly, cell stimulation by plasmin often involves signaling via activation of protease-activated receptor (PAR)-I,¹⁰³ known to be considerably expressed on astrocytes but also on brain microvascular endothelial cells (see sections Plasmin Actions on Brain Endothelial Cells and Plasmin Activation of Astrocytes below). Therefore, uninhibited plasmin could also affect more precise intracellular signaling processes at the BBB.

Together, these attributes position plasmin as a sound candidate to participate in remodeling of cerebral blood vessels, especially during stroke, when the BBB weakens and blood components gain access to known plasmin-sensitive compartments, such as the BM and astrocytic end-feet.

Can Plasmin Escape Natural Inhibition?

A final but critical obstacle remaining in the case for plasmin is the need of this protease to overcome in vivo the dominance of its principal physiologic inhibitor in the circulation, α₂AP, as well as other blood and brain inhibitors (i.e., α₂-macroglobulin and protease nexin-1, respectively).¹⁰⁴ α₂AP is a serine-protease inhibitor (serpin) that circulates at plasma concentration of 1 μmol/L (approximately half the concentration of plasminogen) and possesses unique N- and C-terminal extensions.^2,104 The C terminus tail contains conserved lysine residues, mediating the initial docking of α₂AP to plasmin via lysine-binding sites in the plasmin kringle domains. Indeed, the association of α₂AP with plasmin is one of the fastest known (overall association constant 2 × 10⁷/(mol/L)/second).¹⁰⁴ Despite this efficient interaction, the binding of plasmin to exposed lysine residues on its various targets occupies its lysine-binding sites and reduces the capacity of plasmin to interact with α₂AP. Therefore, surface-bound plasmin is considered to be protected from inhibition.^105,106 Within the human CNS, plasmin can also be regulated by protease nexin-1, a cell-surface- and extracellular matrix-bound serpin that primarily localizes to capillaries, smooth-muscle cells and astrocyte end-feet.¹⁰⁷ Protease nexin-1 exhibits strong inhibitory activity toward thrombin, but also toward trypsin, uPA, and plasmin (association constant for plasmin 1.3 × 10⁵/(mol/L)/second).^104,107 The array of abundant plasmin inhibitors maintains plasmin under tight regulation, as expected when such potent and broad-specificity enzyme is involved (evidently, humans deficient of α₂AP suffer severe hemorrhagic predisposition¹⁰⁸). Therefore, it stands to reason that the bulk of plasmin generated around brain capillaries in the course of rtPA-mediated thrombolysis (and possibly also endogenous plasmin formed in the brain during stroke by upregulated tPA and plasminogen) may be short lived and incapable of exerting substantial BBB damage. However, once we take into account that surface-bound plasmin is protected from inhibition by α₂AP,^105,106 that α₂AP has decreased activity under acidic conditions¹⁰⁹ (which accompany the ischemic brain¹¹⁰), and that during thrombolysis systemic plasmin generation often consumes α₂AP as well as factor VIII and fibrinogen (a process known as plasminemia),^111,112 a putative causal role for plasmin becomes hard to ignore.

Collectively, the enhanced generation of active plasmin during thrombolysis, the reduced potential for plasmin inhibition in its surface-bound state and several plasmin activities that can affect the BBB lend a plausible case for plasmin as a bone fide BBB modulator. Despite this argument, the experimental evidence addressing the role of plasmin in BBB alteration, either alone or in conjunction with rtPA, has created much controversy as described below.

EFFECTS OF PLASMINOGEN AND PLASMIN ON THE BBB IN VIVO

Plasmin Administration into the Brain Parenchyma

Direct intracortical injection of concentrated plasmin (0.7 mg/mL (8.2 μmol/L); 10 μL) into Wistar rats, as well as of high concentration of rtPA (5 mg/mL; ~77 μmol/L), resulted in substantial lesion formation 6 hours later, accompanied by oxidative stress damage to lipids, proteins and DNA, degradation of TJ proteins (occludin) and BM (collagen IV) and elevation of MMP-9, without substantial loss of endothelial cells.⁴² Similar to previous findings reported by the same group in a MCAo stroke model with rtPA treatment,³⁸ astrocytes had detached from the vessel wall in both rtPA and plasmin-treated groups, but the effect appeared much stronger in the latter. In fact, no astrocytes could be observed around capillaries by GFAP staining after plasmin treatment.⁴² Complementary studies in a rat BBB model confirmed the ability of plasmin (as well as rtPA) to damage TJs and to increase BBB permeability. The free-radical scavenger, edaravone, reduced rtPA damage, but was not evaluated against plasmin-induced injury. The study concluded that plasmin can cause comparable BBB damage as rtPA, potentially inflicting oxidative stress to perivascular astrocytes. Nevertheless, both proteases were used at exaggerated concentrations.⁴²

A similar intrastriatal injection of plasmin (50 U/mL, 10 μL; specific activity undisclosed) to Sprague-Dawley rats resulted in enhanced brain uptake of intravenously-injected sucrose as early as 4 hours post injury, which was maximal at 24 hours and coincided with necrosis of the blood vessel wall and prominent deposition of fibrin-like material. However, the effect of plasmin was relatively mild compared with that of elastase.¹¹³ While the effect on BBB integrity was not specifically assessed, a very similar experiment in rats confirmed that plasmin and plasminogen administration (67–670 U/mL and 10–100 U/mL, respectively, 5 μL; specific activity undisclosed) into the rat striatum (as well as thrombin (500–5000 U/mL, 5 μL)) inflicted striatal damage, neuronal apoptosis and brain inflammation 48 hours later, seen by increased infiltration of neutrophils and T-killer cells as well enhanced microglial reactivity. Interestingly, the effect of plasmin/plasminogen was much more potent than that of rtPA.¹¹⁴ Taken together, these experiments (summarized in Table 3) raise the possibility that plasmin is capable of damaging the BBB when applied directly into the brain, primarily affecting the abluminal components of the NVU.

Table 3.

Effects of plasminogen and plasmin in the brain and on the BBB in vivo

Category	Species	Injury model	Protease/dose or concentration	Effect on BBB and brain parenchyma	Citation
Intracerebral injection	Rat	Intracortical injection	Plasmin/0.7 mg/mL (8.2 μmol/L); 10 μL	Deleterious	42
	Rat	Intrastriatal injection	Plasmin/50 U/ml; 10 μL	Deleterious	113
	Rat	Intrastriatal injection	Plasminogen 10 and 100 U/mL; 5 μL Plasmin 67 and 670 U/mL; 5 μL	Deleterious	114
Intravenous	Rabbit	Ear puncture	Plasmin/up to 8 mg/kg	No bleeding up to 6 mg/kg	112
administration				Bleeding at 8 mg/kg
	Rabbit	Thrombosed abdominal aorta and ear puncture	Plasmin/2 and 4 mg/kg	Beneficial, no bleeding	116
	Rat	MCAo 3 hours + reperfusion 24 hours	Microplasmin/10 mg/kg	Beneficial	117
	Mouse	MCAo 30 minutes or 4 hours + reperfusion 24 hours	Microplasmin/5 and 10 mg/kg	Safe at 5 mg/kg in both MCAO schedules. Enhanced ICH at 10 mg/kg	118
	Rat	No injury	Plasminogen (mg) + rtPA (μg) 12 + 60,6 + 30,0.5 + 2.5	Deleterious	111
	Rat	MCAo 1 hour + reperfusion 24 hours (treatment 5 hours post MCAo)	rtPA (10 mg/kg)-digested blood clot (200 μL), containing mainly plasmin	Deleterious	120
Plasminogen knockout mice	Mouse	Thrombotic MCAo, 24 hours	rtPA (10 mg/kg) 4 hours post MCAo	Protective (reduced ICH; i.e., plasminogen is deleterious)	41
	Mouse	Permanent MCAo, 24 hours		Deleterious (increased infarct size; i.e., plasminogen is protective)	121
	Mouse	Permanent MCAo, 6 hours		Deleterious, same as wild-type (i.e., plasminogen does not have a role)	26
	Mouse	Kainate intrahippocampal		Deleterious, same as wild-type (i.e., plasminogen does not have a role)	77

BBB, blood–brain barrier; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; MCAo, middle cerebral artery occlusion; rtPA, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator.

Systemic Plasmin and Plasminogen Administration in Normal and Ischemic Conditions

While the above experiments imply that plasmin can affect the BBB from the brain side, can it also initiate similar actions working from the vascular compartment?

Noticeably, systemic administration of plasmin or its truncated derivatives (i.e., microplasmin, consisting only the serine-protease domain, or mini-plasmin, harboring kringle 5 and the protease domain¹¹⁵) has a striking hemostatic safety advantage over PAs¹¹⁵ with regards to general bleeding susceptibility^112,116 and particularly with relation to ICH in experimental models of stroke.^117,118 Plasmin could be given up to six times the therapeutic dose of rtPA (i.e., up to 6 mg/kg) before bleeding re-occurred in a rabbit ear puncture model, despite the observed plasminemia characterized by consumption of α₂AP, factor VIII and fibrinogen post intravenous plasmin application. In contrast, rtPA caused uncontrolled bleeding already at 0.25 mg/kg, a quarter of its therapeutic concentration.¹¹² In rodent stroke models, microplasmin preserved the BM, reduced brain hemorrhage and decreased infarct volume compared with saline, rtPA, and TNK-tPA.^117,118 These beneficial plasmin activities, attributed to the rapid containment of plasmin by circulating α₂AP,^112,115 suggest that systemic administration of active plasmin (given in comparable therapeutic doses to rtPA) may not induce substantial BBB damage and hemorrhage. An ex vivo experiment in an organ perfusion model (where rat brains were first cleared of blood followed by protease infusion) supports this idea; indeed, perfusion of plasmin or mini-plasmin, but not of inactive plasmin, caused extravasation of circulating horseradish peroxidase into the brain, indicative of BBB opening. However, if the blood was only partially washed out of the microcirculation, plasmin perfusion did not affect the BBB.¹¹⁹ These observations suggest that the action of systemic plasmin on the BBB is efficiently contained in vivo by circulating plasmin inhibitors.

While the discussion above argues against a role for plasmin, it must be remembered that physiologic plasmin generation occurs locally and is driven by a PA-mediated cleavage of the precursor plasminogen on the surface of fibrin or cells, serving as a template. It is therefore possible that plasmin will contribute to BBB disruption only when generated by tPA in situ, directed to specific NVU components (rather than solution-applied) and when it is protected from α₂AP inhibition.^105,106 In support of this idea, intravenous administration of rtPA together with plasminogen in three dose-decreasing schedules into naïve, stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats promoted intracranial IgG extravasation. This breakdown of the BBB was attributed to plasminemia, which greatly increased the hemorrhagic potential.¹¹¹

Plasmin, generated in situ by tPA, also potentiated BBB breakdown during experimental stroke. In an interesting experiment by Gautier and Colleagues,¹²⁰ MCAo was induced for 1 hour in spontaneously hypertensive rats, followed by intravenous administration 5 hours later of saline, rtPA or rtPA-dissolved autologous blood clot (rtPA + TLP (‘thrombolysis products’)), containing mainly in situ-made plasmin. It was observed that rtPA + TLP increased the cerebral hemorrhage severity at 24 hours, evident by augmented petechiae, which was associated with enhanced mortality in the rtPA + TLP group. Ex vivo, MCA vasodilation in response to acetylcholine was diminished by ischemia and further reduced by rtPA + TLP treatment, but not by rtPA alone, suggestive of a plasmin-mediated impairment of endothelium-dependent vascular response in the brain.

In summary, it can be speculated that generation of plasmin in situ by rtPA, but not free, active plasmin, has a greater potential to alter BBB integrity when administered intravenously, in line with our original hypothesis. These studies are further collated in Table 3.

Experiments in Plasminogen Knockout Mice

The involvement of plasmin/plasminogen in BBB breakdown can also be inferred from experiments in plasminogen-defkient mice, but inconsistencies are present in the literature (see Table 3). Suzuki et al⁴¹ confirmed the involvement of plasmin/plasminogen in ICH formation as plasminogen^−/– mice undergoing thrombotic MCAo did not show elevated intracranial bleeding 20 hours post delayed treatment with rtPA (administered 4 hours post stroke), in contrast to their plasminogen^+/+ littermate controls.⁴¹ This observation indicates that during thrombolysis plasmin contributes to severe destabilization of vessel structure and passage of whole blood into the brain, potentially by degradation of the BM (considered a principal event underlying hemorrhagic conversion^58,100). However, others demonstrated by the Evans blue technique a robust extravasation of circulating albumin 6 hours post permanent MCAo in plasminogen^−/– mice.²⁶ This observation suggests that basal processes responsible for TJ damage (without exogenous application of rtPA), which enable paracellular passage of ions, plasma proteins and fluid into the brain and formation of vasogenic edema,⁵⁸ can proceed independent of plasmin activity. Similarly, Chen et al⁷⁷ showed BBB opening by detection of cerebral immunoglobulin G after kainate delivery into the hippocampus of plasminogen^−/– mice (as well as in wild-type and tPA^−/– mice), indicating that acute excitotoxic injury impairs the BBB without the requirement for tPA/plasmin (in contrast to critical roles of these proteases in kainate-mediated neuronal degeneration). Noticeably, intrahippocampal, but not intravenous administration of plasminogen, re-sensitized plasminogen^−/– mice to kainate-triggered hippocampal neurodegeneration, suggesting that circulating plasminogen cannot fulfill neurotoxic roles in the brain parenchyma.⁷⁷ One might postulate that plasma-derived plasminogen ‘leaks’ into the brain together with α₂AP, which effectively restricts its action. In an extensive study of murine gene deletion constructs by Nagai et al,¹²¹ permanent MCA ligation (24 hours) resulted in an increase or a reduction of infarct size in plasminogen^−/– or α₂AP^−/– mice compared with wild-type controls, respectively,¹²¹ implying a neuroprotective role for plasmin during stroke. However, in both these genotypes fibrin deposition within the infarct zone (indicative of altered blood vessel permeability) remained intravascular, compared with extravascular fibrin reactivity in PAI-1^−/– mice.¹²¹ These findings indicate the involvement of endogenous plasmin in neuronal death, but not in BBB alteration during stroke (consistent with the notion that BBB disruption and neurotoxicity are distinguishable events in the rodent^75–77), in contrast to endogenous tPA, which participates in both.

Overall, a rather complex picture emerges in plasminogen knockout mice that could be partially derived from the various stroke models used, from inclusion or exclusion of rtPA and from the different readouts tested (i.e., hemorrhage versus plasma extravasation). As it currently stands, the data suggest that endogenous plasminogen present in the brain during stroke not only avoids playing a role in ischemia-mediated TJ damage and formation of vasogenic edema,⁵⁸ but also possesses neuroprotective capabilities. However, initiation of thrombolysis by rtPA may tilt excess plasmin into a more detrimental direction, resulting in proteolytic destabilization of vessel structure and development of ICH.^58,100 Additional experimentation in plasminogen^−/– mice is required to further evaluate this concept.

MECHANISMS FOR BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER MODULATION BY PLASMIN

In a more controlled in vitro environment the effect of plasmin on various cell types is prominent. The actions of plasmin often include remarkably similar signaling events, such as changes in intracellular calcium (Δ[Ca²⁺]_i) and activation of pathways like the phosphati-dylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, mitogen-activated protein kinases, Rho/ROCK and more (reviewed by Syrovets et al).¹⁰³ Of particular relevance, plasmin affects the principal constituents of the NVU (BECs, astrocytes, neurons, and the BM) and increases permeability in human⁴³ and rodent^42,122 BBB models. The mechanisms underlying these effects will be overviewed below and are further listed and illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 1, respectively.

Plasmin Actions on Brain Endothelial Cells

Cell surface-generated plasmin activates many pathways in endothelial cells,¹⁰³ some could potentially contribute to the modulation of BBB permeability. For example, plasmin initiates in vitro a PAR-1 -independent increase in cytosolic Ca²⁺ and nitric oxide production in human and porcine coronary ECs, leading to vasorelaxation and implying plasmin, like tPA,^65,66 as a modulator of vascular tone.¹²³ In the brain, PAR-1, a substrate for plasmin (see Plasmin Activation of Astrocytes below), could not be detected in rat BECs utilizing in situ hybridization¹²⁴ but was later found together with PAR-3 (and PAR-2) on these cells in vitro by RT-PCR.¹²⁵ Whether PAR-1 on BECs is expressed in a polar distribution across the apical and basolateral membranes, an important determinant for possible activation by brain-derived proteases, has not been determined¹²⁵ (the susceptibility of BECs to blood-born proteases, such as thrombin or plasmin, suggests at least an apical expression). Nevertheless, brain endothelial PAR-1 could functionally induce Δ[Ca²⁺]_i in response to thrombin stimulation. Plasmin could not trigger BEC Δ[Ca²⁺]_i on its own but abolished BEC responsiveness to thrombin.¹²⁵ This observation suggests that plasmin in fact inactivates PAR-1 in BECs (a conclusion reached by others in coronary ECs¹²³), providing a path for plasmin interference of BEC activation.

Although this may imply a protective effect of plasmin on the BBB, other data link plasmin to BECs damage and BBB disruption (Figure 1A). Plasmin or mini-plasmin was shown in a number of studies to rapidly bind monolayers of human BECs in a reversible fashion.^119,126 Plasmin subsequently induced a ‘spiderlike’ contraction of BECs, seen as early as 30 seconds post application. While other hemostatic factors, such as thrombin, uPA, elastase and fibrin, induced a similar BEC contraction, plasmin was the fastest to act.^119,127 Similarly, our group reported marked morphologic changes in human BECs post application of rtPA and plasminogen, which were blocked by aprotinin and tranexamic acid and fully correlated with permeability changes induced by rtPA and plasminogen in BEC monolayers.⁴³ Plasmin-induced retraction is not limited to brain ECs and can be seen, for example, in human umbilical vein endothelial cells treated with uPA/rtPA and plasminogen.¹²⁸ Recent identification of rtPA-mediated ROCK activation in BECs,³⁵ potentially driven by plasmin-cleaved monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)¹²² (see section Rho-Kinase- and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1-Dependent Pathways below), can provide in principle the driving force for the BEC retraction phenomenon.

During the initial stages of plasmin exposure, BECs experience reversible changes that include damage to cell-cell boundaries, disruption of monolayer integrity,¹²⁸ membrane blebbing, vesiculation and formation of micro-particles (~300 nm in diameter).¹²⁶ Of note, micro-particles carry both plasminogen-activator and plasmin/plasminogen, and thus can transmit the proteolytic activity of plasmin and its associated signaling beyond the original site of plasmin activation.¹²⁶ If plasmin stimulation persists beyond several hours, matrix proteins are severely degraded, triggering loss of cell adhesion and subsequent cell death by apoptosis.^126,128 Importantly, as surface-bound plasmin is protected from inhibition,^105,106 the process is less susceptible for attenuation by α₂AP.¹²⁸

Surface-bound plasmin therefore induces morphologic and functional changes in a range of cultured ECs, including brain ECs, which can affect their ‘tight’ BBB phenotype (Figure 1A).

Plasmin-mediated retraction of BECs may be also an important first step in the extravasation of blood cells through the capillary wall, as it uncovers the underlying BM, exposing matrix proteins for cellular digestion.¹²⁸ Notably, rtPA-generated plasmin also participates directly in BM degradation by infiltrating cells. For example, the passage of C6 glioma cells through artificial laminin or collagen I barriers (without cells) was dramatically enhanced by addition of rtPA and plasminogen. Annexin A2 was pointed out as the primary gliomal receptor responsible for efficient cell-surface plasmin generation and glioma invasion. In vivo, knockdown of Annexin A2 in glioma cells reduced their metastatic, angiogenic and growth capabilities, highlighting the therapeutic potential of the Annexin A2-tPA-plasmin axes in the treatment of brain cancers.¹²⁹

In summary, plasmin-induced retraction of BECs may contribute to BBB disruption, formation of edema and ICH and infiltration of cells into the brain. This mechanism is especially relevant during thrombolytic therapy; first, substantial levels of in situ-generated plasmin could outweigh the inhibitory capacity of the various blood and brain plasmin inhibitors.^119,127 Second, the ischemic insult damages TJs and permits easier access of blood-derived plasmin to the BM, accelerating BM degradation and creating a positive feedback loop for BEC retraction. Interestingly (as indicated in section Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator and the Non-lschemic Blood–Brain Barrier above), it was reported that intracerebroventricular,^24,26 but not intravenous²⁴ administration of mouse tPA into uninjured mice promoted breakdown of the BBB, suggesting that a preceding brain insult is required for development of tPA damage from the vascular compartment, at least in the mouse (recall that systemic delivery of tPA opened the BBB in naïve rats^20–22). By inference, circulating plasmin may be able to initiate its deleterious cascade in BECs only once TJs have been compromised.

Beyond these conceptual considerations, in vivo evidence for BEC retraction (or damage) post rtPA treatment or after exposure to plasmin is scant. In fact, few studies have shown that BBB injury post thrombolysis does not involve the brain endothelium but is associated instead with morphologic changes in astrocytes (see section Plasmin Activation of Astrocytes below).^26,28,38,42 For example, rtPA³⁸ and plasmin⁴² induced no obvious changes in endothelial cell markers despite significant reduction in BM proteins and a partial decrease in TJ proteins, suggestive of a brain-to-blood effect on brain capillaries.^38,42 Yet, scanning electron micrographs of brain capillaries by Ishiguro et al³⁶ clearly showed substantial endothelium disruption and disappearance of BEC nuclei post treatment with rtPA in stroke. Others reported functional impairment of brain endothelium post treatment with plasmin (see section Systemic Plasmin and Plasminogen Administration in Normal and Ischemic Conditions above)¹² or rtPA¹³⁰ ex vivo. Of note, BEC retraction and interendothelial gap formation is also induced by many inflammatory mediators, including thrombin, and were suggested to participate in thrombin-mediated development of vasogenic edema during brain ischemia or cerebral hematoma.⁵⁸ Nevertheless, more detailed work is warranted to determine whether plasmin-dependent BEC retraction is relevant for BBB disruption in vivo.

Plasmin Activation of Astrocytes

An intricate and reciprocal relationship exists between astrocytes and plasmin, as astroglia both modulate BEC (and BBB) sensitivity to plasmin and become affected by its action. For example, in keeping with their well-described role as the major inducers of BBB properties in BECs,¹³¹ astrocytes increase LDLR expression in the latter,¹³² possibly transforming BECs into a more tPA/plasmin-responsive phenotype. Conversely, tPA⁶⁴ and plasminogen (potentially microglia-derived)¹³³ can stimulate intracellular signaling in astrocytes (e.g., the Rho/ROCK pathway and p38 + c-Jun N-terminal MAPK (JNK), respectively), which mediate glial release of BBB-permeating factors, such as MMPs⁶⁴ and MCP-1¹³⁴ (see sections Modes of Action and Rho-Kinase- and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1-Dependent Pathways, respectively). As an added complexity, plasminogen-induced p38 and JNK signaling also induces PAI-1 secretion in cultured rat astrocytes, implying that plasmin also initiates a negative feedback loop in glia that may protect the BBB from excessive fibrinolytic activity.¹³³ Hence, the net effect of plasmin on the BBB in a given scenario will be influenced by a complex cross-talk between the various cell types comprising this multilayered structure.

When describing the effect of plasmin on astrocytes, an emphasis should be placed on PAR-1, a G-protein coupled receptor most potently activated by thrombin, which can also be cleaved by plasmin.^135,136 However, the action of plasmin on PAR-1 is complex as plasmin can activate^103,136,137 or inactivate^{123,125,135,137} the receptor, cleaving the N-terminal exodomain of PAR-1 at the thrombin cleavage site (Arg₄₁-Ser₄₂),¹³⁷ but also doing so inappropriately in other positions,¹³⁵ creating a number of different tethered ligands.

In the human brain, PAR-1 is moderately expressed in neurons but is predominantly present on the astrocyte soma and end-feet ensheathing the capillaries.^138,139 Both neurons and astrocytes are similarly PAR-1-positive in the rat brain.^124,140 PAR-1 is also upregulated in the brain during cerebral ischemia.¹⁴¹ Collectively, it seems plausible that plasmin may participate in some of the vast array of PAR-1-dependent brain processes (reviewed by Adams et al),¹³⁶ with potential consequences for the BBB, particularly during stroke. Despite this argument, although PAR-1^−/– mice show reduced infarct volume 24 hours after 30 minutes MCAo, they do not display any detectable differences compared with wild-type mice in the anatomy of healthy cerebral microvessels or in the level of BBB breakdown 4 hours after similar occlusion.¹³⁹ This result suggests that the net effect of PAR-1 activation by thrombin/plasmin during stroke contributes to neurotoxicity in the brain parenchyma rather than to astrocyte-dependent BBB modulation. Yet, permeability assessment at a later time frame (24 hours) was critically required to fully confirm this conclusion.

Plasmin had been shown, however, to exert a number of PAR-1-dependent effects in cultured astrocytes,^103,142 which can be linked to both BBB protection and harm. For example, exposure of astrocytes to plasmin or plasminogen prompted astrocytic TGF-/β3 production in a PAR-1 and PI3K/Akt-dependent mechanism.¹⁴³ Astrocyte-derived TGF-β in turn downregulated tPA (and thrombomodulin) expression in cerebral endothelial cells.¹⁴⁴ Thus, plasmin-stimulated astrocytes potentially suppresses the fibrinolytic capacity at the BBB, consistent with the plasminogen-dependent, astrocytic PAI-1 release mentioned above.¹³³

In contrast, recent in vitro findings from our group⁴³ and a follow-up work by others¹⁴² showed that rodent and human astrocytes, like endothelial cells (section Plasmin Actions on Brain Endothelial Cells), undergo significant, PAR-1-dependent¹⁴² morphology changes in response to plasmin or rtPA⁴³/streptokinase¹⁴²-activated plasminogen (Figure 1B). These transformations underlined ROCK-mediated opening of the BBB (see also section Rho-Kinase- and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1-Dependent Pathways below),⁴³ indicative of their possible functional significance. If exposure to plasmin was prolonged, astrocytes detached and went through apoptotic cell death.¹⁴² Hence, excessive, PAR-1-mediated plasmin activity may also harbor deleterious consequences to astrocytes and to the BBB (Figure 1B).

Finally, plasmin, via PAR-1, initiated hydrolysis of phosphoinositides, Δ[Ca²⁺], and ERK1/2 signaling in astrocytes, which potentiated neuronal NMDAR function.¹⁴⁵ The possible contribution of this pathway to NVU function, however, remains unclear.

In summary, plasmin exerts in vitro diverse effects in astrocytes, with either beneficial or deleterious potential to the function of the BBB. The net contribution of these events to plasmin-dependent BBB alteration in vivo remains to be elucidated.

Rho-Kinase- and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1-Dependent Pathways

The most recently-discovered plasmin-dependent mechanisms for BBB opening originate from either BECs^122,146 or astrocytes⁴³ and involve various extracellular initiators and cell-surface receptors. Nevertheless, a common component underling these pathways is the ultimate activation of ROCK and modulation of the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 1).

The MCP-1 pathway occurs in BECs (Figure 1A) and relies on the ability of plasmin to cleave the chemokine MCP-1.¹²² Full-length MCP-1, via interaction with its receptor C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), was shown to impair BBB integrity under normal conditions¹⁴⁶ and during OGD/reoxygenation¹⁴⁷ in a process involving Rho/ROCK activation¹⁴⁸ and downstream engagement of the α-isoform of protein kinase C alpha.¹⁴⁹ This in turn caused modulation of the actin cytoskeleton and disruption of endothelial TJs. It was then discovered that plasmin can cleave MCP-1 at lysine residue 104¹⁵⁰ and that the truncated MCP-1 is more potent at activating microglia than the full-length MCP-1. Consequently, microglial recruitment to the site of injury and progression of excitotoxicity were enhanced.^150,151 Recently, cleaved MCP-1 was also demonstrated to harbor a greater capacity to induce stress-fiber formation in BECs (indicative of enhanced activation of the Rho/ROCK pathway and generation of contractile forces) and to trigger phosphorylation of ezrin–radixin–moesin proteins, which serve as linkers between the actin cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane. Together, these signaling pathways were proposed to underlie an enhanced capacity of plasmin-cleaved MCP-1 to redistribute TJ proteins and to increase BBB permeability in vitro and in vivo.²² One limitation worth noting in this study is that the full-length MCP-1 was never directly compared with or without plasmin (for example in plasminogen^−/– mice) to fully prove the concept; instead, a recombinantly truncated MCP-1 or full-length MCP-1 together with the plasmin inhibitor α₂AP were used.¹²² Importantly, the MCP-1 pathway does not involve astrocytes, as only BECs deficient of CCR2, but not CCR2^−/– astrocytes, could offer protection against MCP-1 treatment in a mouse syngeneic in vitro BBB model.¹⁴⁶ A non-related study showed that the ROCK inhibitor fasudil (HA1077) attenuated rtPA-dependent MMP-9 production and cytotoxicity in human BECs, suggesting that rtPA is also capable of activating ROCK in human BECs. However, exaggerated rtPA concentrations were required and the role of plasmin and MCP-1 was not assessed.³⁵

We recently highlighted plasmin-mediated activation of ROCK in astrocytes as a key event underling a unique capacity of rtPA to modulate a human BBB model¹⁵² by receptor-mediated mechanism⁴³ (Figure 1B). Our studies suggested that in situ activation of plasminogen on the surface of astrocytes, specifically mediated by rtPA (but not by other plasminogen activators), has a superior capacity compared with rtPA or plasmin alone to increase BBB permeability. These findings thus represent a novel concept where unique synergism between rtPA and plasminogen/plasmin is pivotal for alteration of BBB permeability. Furthermore, while BECs and astrocytes both responded by morphologic changes to the action of rtPA and plasmin, ROCK activation (which was accompanied by enlargement of focal adhesion, enhanced myosin contractility and stress-fiber formation) was exclusively observed in astrocytes in a process which involved LDLRs (possibly serving as a cell-surface tPA receptor) and other yet-to-be identified plasminogen receptor/s⁴³ (Figure 1B). Numerous animal studies reported astrocytic retraction from the vessel wall post rtPA or plasmin administration,^24,27,38,42 an observation that may represent the in vivo correlate of our findings in vitro.

In summary, ROCK activation in BECs and astrocytes emerges as a key element allowing plasmin, alone and in conjunction with tPA (or rtPA), to modulate BBB permeability. Pharmacological targeting of ROCK and/or relevant cell-surface receptors (CCR2, LDLRs) should be incorporated into novel strategies aiming to increase the safety of rtPA treatment. Indeed, recent in vivo work, which utilized fasudil³⁵ or the LDLR inhibitor receptor-associated protein,³⁹ successfully attenuated the hemorrhagic side effects of rtPA in mouse models of stroke.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Despite fundamental variations between observations made in rodent and in primate species, the idea that rtPA and with less certainty endogenous tPA cause BBB alteration in humans during thrombolysis in stroke has gained solid experimental support. A role for plasmin or tPA-activated plasminogen in this process is not fully clarified, but cannot be ignored. Plasmin can evidently influence the isolated NVU components and observations/mechanisms showing plasmin-induced BBB opening certainly exist. Yet, other evidence is provided to the contrary or implies that the tight regulation of plasmin by its potent inhibitors (α₂AP and other brain inhibitors) will result in a net lack of potency. Hence, the subject is still controversial.

One must remember, however, that tPA-dependent plasminogen activation principally occurs in a local, cofactor-dependent manner (i.e., on the surface of fibrin, cells, or cell debris), where plasmin is less susceptible to inhibition; such a shielding process is absolutely essential for the progression of clot degradation. As clot dissolution is ultimately achieved and free plasmin activity is also detected in plasma during thrombolysis, uninhibited in situ-generated plasmin is certainly available during rtPA treatment for interaction with brain capillaries in infarcted as well as in unaffected brain tissue. Hence the unique conditions evolving during thrombolysis, when excess rtPA interacts with circulating plasminogen, increase the likelihood of a plasmin-dependent BBB alteration, in keeping with our original hypothesis.

Taken together, although additional work is needed to distinguish the effects of tPA and plasmin on the BBB, current state-of-the-art suggests that both agents are indeed capable of damaging the cerebral vasculature; the remaining question is to what extent. Future efforts to improve the safety of rtPA treatment in stroke may need to address the non-fibrinolytic effects of plasmin on the BBB without compromising its fibrinolytic capacity.

Akin to tPA, such approaches could include blockade of plasmin-triggered intracellular signaling. Simultaneous interference with both tPA and plasmin activities may offer a more efficacious therapeutic option.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Collen

Lijnen

. Thrombolytic agents. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93: 627–630.

Cesarman-Maus

Hajjar

. Molecular mechanisms of fibrinolysis. Br J Haematol 2005; 129: 307–321.

Collen

Lijnen

. Tissue-type plasminogen activator: a historical perspective and personal account. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 541–546.

NINDS trial. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1581–1587.

Hacke

Kaste

Bluhmki

Brozman

Davalos

Guidetti

. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1317–1329.

Derex

Nighoghossian

. Intracerebral haemorrhage after thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: an update. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 1093–1099.

Lees

Bluhmki

von Kummer

Brott

Toni

Grotta

. Time to treatment with intravenous alteplase and outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. Lancet 2010; 375: 1695–1703.

Sappino

Madani

Huarte

Belin

Kiss

Wohlwend

. Extracellular proteolysis in the adult murine brain. J Clin Invest 1993; 92: 679–685.

Vassalli

Sappino

Belin

. The plasminogen activator/plasmin system. J Clin Invest 1991; 88: 1067–1072.

10.

Tsirka

Rogove

Bugge

Degen

Strickland

. An extracellular proteolytic cascade promotes neuronal degeneration in the mouse hippocampus. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 543–552.

11.

Soreq

Miskin

. Plasminogen activator in the rodent brain. Brain Res 1981; 216: 361–374.

12.

Salles

Strickland

. Localization and regulation of the tissue plasminogen activator-plasmin system in the hippocampus. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 2125–2134.

13.

Jin

Yang

. Molecular insights and therapeutic targets for blood–brain barrier disruption in ischemic stroke: critical role of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue-type plasminogen activator. Neurobiol Dis 2010; 38: 376–385.

14.

Melchor

Strickland

. Tissue plasminogen activator in central nervous system physiology and pathology. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93: 655–660.

15.

Samson

Medcalf

. Tissue-type plasminogen activator: a multifaceted modulator of neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity. Neuron 2006; 50: 673–678.

16.

Vivien

Gauberti

Montagne

Defer

Touze

. Impact of tissue plasminogen activator on the neurovascular unit: from clinical data to experimental evidence. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011; 31: 2119–2134.

17.

NINDS Group. Intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke. The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Stroke 1997; 28: 2109–2118.

18.

Hill

Barber

Demchuk

Sevick

Frayne

Buchan

. Symptomatic hemorrhage after alteplase therapy not due to silent ischemia. BMC Neurol 2001; 1: 1.

19.

Gebel

Sila

Sloan

Granger

Mahaffey

Weisenberger

. Thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage: a radiographic analysis of 244 cases from the GUSTO-1 trial with clinical correlation. Global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries. Stroke 1998; 29: 563–569.

20.

Jaffer

Adjei

Labhasetwar

. Optical imaging to map blood–brain barrier leakage. Sci Rep 2013; 3: 3117.

21.

Abu Fanne

Nassar

Yarovoi

Rayan

Lamensdorf

Karakoveski

. Blood–brain barrier permeability and tPA-mediated neurotoxicity. Neuropharmacology 2010; 58: 972–980.

22.

Turner

Vink

. Combined tissue plasminogen activator and an NK1 tachykinin receptor antagonist: an effective treatment for reperfusion injury following acute ischemic stroke in rats. Neuroscience 2012; 220: 1–10.

23.

Benchenane

Berezowski

Ali

Fernandez-Monreal

Lopez-Atalaya

Brillault

. Tissue-type plasminogen activator crosses the intact blood–brain barrier by low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-mediated transcytosis. Circulation 2005; 111: 2241–2249.

24.

Fredriksson

Geyer

Folestad

Cale

Andrae

. Activation of PDGF-CC by tissue plasminogen activator impairs blood–brain barrier integrity during ischemic stroke. Nat Med 2008; 14: 731–737.

25.

Cheng

Petraglia

Thiyagarajan

Zhong

. Activated protein C inhibits tissue plasminogen activator-induced brain hemorrhage. Nat Med 2006; 12: 1278–1285.

26.

Yepes

Sandkvist

Moore

Bugge

Strickland

Lawrence

. Tissue-type plasminogen activator induces opening of the blood–brain barrier via the LDL receptor-related protein. J Clin Invest 2003; 112: 1533–1540.

27.

Polavarapu

Gongora

Ranganthan

Lawrence

Strickland

. Tissue-type plasminogen activator-mediated shedding of astrocytic low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein increases the permeability of the neurovascular unit. Blood 2007; 109: 3270–3278.

28.

Kassner

Roberts

Moran

Silver

Mikulis

. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator increases blood–brain barrier disruption in acute ischemic stroke: an MR imaging permeability study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1864–1869.

29.

Kidwell

Latour

Saver

Alger

Starkman

Duckwiler

. Thrombolytic toxicity: blood brain barrier disruption in human ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25: 338–343.

30.

del Zoppo

Izawa

Hawkins

. Hemostasis and alterations of the central nervous system. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39: 856–875.

31.

del Zoppo

Copeland

Anderchek

Hacke

Koziol

. Hemorrhagic transformation following tissue plasminogen activator in experimental cerebral infarction. Stroke 1990; 21: 596–601.

32.

Lapchak

Chapman

Zivin

. Metalloproteinase inhibition reduces thrombolytic (tissue plasminogen activator)-induced hemorrhage after thromboembolic stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 3034–3040.

33.

Zhang

Yepes

Jiang

Arniego

. Adjuvant treatment with neuroserpin increases the therapeutic window for tissue-type plasminogen activator administration in a rat model of embolic stroke. Circulation 2002; 106: 740–745.

34.

Won

Lee

Wali

Stein

Sayeed

. Progesterone attenuates hemorrhagic transformation after delayed tPA treatment in an experimental model of stroke in rats: involvement of the VEGF-MMP pathway. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014; 34: 72–80.

35.

Ishiguro

Kawasaki

Suzuki

Ishizuka

Mishiro

Egashira

. A Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, fasudil, prevents matrix metalloproteinase-9-related hemorrhagic transformation in mice treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Neuroscience 2012; 220: 302–312.

36.

Ishiguro

Mishiro

Fujiwara

Chen

Izuta

Tsuruma

. Phospho-diesterase-III inhibitor prevents hemorrhagic transformation induced by focal cerebral ischemia in mice treated with tPA. PLoS One 2010; 5: e15178.

37.

Yagi

Kitazato

Uno

Tada

Kinouchi

Shimada

. Edaravone, a free radical scavenger, inhibits MMP-9-related brain hemorrhage in rats treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 2009; 40: 626–631.

38.

Yamashita

Kamiya

Deguchi

Inaba

Zhang

Shang

. Dissociation and protection of the neurovascular unit after thrombolysis and reperfusion in ischemic rat brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009; 29: 715–725.

39.

Suzuki

Nagai

Yamakawa

Kawakami

Lijnen

Umemura

. Tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) induces stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) in endothelial cells through activation of lipoprotein receptor-related protein. Blood 2009; 114: 3352–3358.

40.

Teng

Beray-Berthat

Coqueran

Lesbats

Kuntz

Palmier

. Prevention of rt-PA induced blood–brain barrier component degradation by the poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibitor PJ34 after ischemic stroke in mice. Exp Neurol 2013; 248: 416–428.

41.

Suzuki

Nagai

Umemura

Collen

Lijnen

. Stromelysin-1 (MMP-3) is critical for intracranial bleeding after t-PA treatment of stroke in mice. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 1732–1739.

42.

Lukic-Panin

Deguchi

Yamashita

Shang

Zhang

Tian

. Free radical scavenger edaravone administration protects against tissue plasminogen activator induced oxidative stress and blood brain barrier damage. Curr Neurovasc Res 2010; 7: 319–329.

43.

Niego

Freeman

Puschmann

Turnley

Medcalf

. t-PA-specific modulation of a human BBB model involves plasmin-mediated activation of the Rho-kinase pathway in astrocytes. Blood 2012; 119: 4752–4761.

44.

Armstead

Nassar

Akkawi

Smith

Chen

Cines

. Neutralizing the neurotoxic effects of exogenous and endogenous tPA. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 1150–1155.

45.

Rickles

Darrow

Strickland

. Molecular cloning of complementary DNA to mouse tissue plasminogen activator mRNA and its expression during F9 terato-carcinoma cell differentiation. J Biol Chem 1988; 263: 1563–1569.

46.

Lijnen

van Hoef

Beelen

Collen

. Characterization of the murine plasma fibrinolytic system. Eur J Biochem 1994; 224: 863–871.

47.

Korninger

Collen

. Studies on the specific fibrinolytic effect of human extrinsic (tissue-type) plasminogen activator in human blood and in various animal species in vitro. Thromb Haemost 1981; 46: 561–565.

48.

Acheampong

Ford

. Pharmacokinetics of alteplase in the treatment of ischaemic stroke. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2012; 8: 271–281.

49.

Samson

Nevin

Medcalf

. Low molecular weight contaminants in commercial preparations of plasmin and t-PA activate neurons. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 2218–2220.

50.

Roussel

Macrez

Jullienne

Agin

Maubert

Dauphinot

. Age and albumin D site-binding protein control tissue plasminogen activator levels: neurotoxic impact. Brain 2009; 132: 2219–2230.

51.

Hosomi

Lucero

Heo

Koziol

Copeland

del Zoppo

. Rapid differential endogenous plasminogen activator expression after acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2001; 32: 1341–1348.

52.

Chang

Hosomi

Lucero

Heo

Abumiya

Mazar

. Activation systems for latent matrix metalloproteinase-2 are upregulated immediately after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003; 23: 1408–1419.

53.

Yepes

Sandkvist

Wong

Coleman

Smith

Cohan

. Neuro-serpin reduces cerebral infarct volume and protects neurons from ischemia-induced apoptosis. Blood 2000; 96: 569–576.

54.

Sashindranath

Samson

Downes

Crack

Lawrence

. Compartment- and context-specific changes in tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) activity following brain injury and pharmacological stimulation. Lab Invest 2011; 91: 1079–1091.

55.

Wang

Tsirka

Strickland

Stieg

Soriano

Lipton

. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) increases neuronal damage after focal cerebral ischemia in wild-type and tPA-deficient mice. Nat Med 1998; 4: 228–231.

56.

Sashindranath

Sales

Daglas

Freeman

Samson

Cops

. The tissue-type plasminogen activator-plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 complex promotes neurovascular injury in brain trauma: evidence from mice and humans. Brain 2012; 135: 3251–3264.

57.

Rosenberg

Yang

. Vasogenic edema due to tight junction disruption by matrix metalloproteinases in cerebral ischemia. Neurosurg Focus 2007; 22: E4.

58.

Simard

Kent

Chen

Tarasov

Gerzanich

. Brain oedema in focal ischaemia: molecular pathophysiology and theoretical implications. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 258–268.

59.

Horstmann

Kalb

Koziol

Gardner

Wagner

. Profiles of matrix metalloproteinases, their inhibitors, and laminin in stroke patients: influence of different therapies. Stroke 2003; 34: 2165–2170.

60.

Tsuji

Aoki

Tejima

Arai

Lee

Atochin

. Tissue plasminogen activator promotes matrix metalloproteinase-9 upregulation after focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2005; 36: 1954–1959.

61.

Sumii

. Involvement of matrix metalloproteinase in thrombolysis-associated hemorrhagic transformation after embolic focal ischemia in rats. Stroke 2002; 33: 831–836.

62.

Wang

Lee

Arai

Tsuji

Rebeck

. Lipoprotein receptor-mediated induction of matrix metalloproteinase by tissue plasminogen activator. Nat Med 2003; 9: 1313–1317.

63.

Zhang

Haile

Echeverry

Strickland

Yepes

. Microglial low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 mediates the effect of tissue-type plasminogen activator on matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity in the ischemic brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009; 29: 1946–1954.

64.

Wang

Lee

Guo

Kim

Montaner

Wang

. Reduction of tissue plasminogen activator-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 by simvastatin in astrocytes. Stroke 2006; 37: 1910–1912.

65.

Nassar

Akkawi

Shina

Haj-Yehia

Bdeir

Tarshis

. In vitro and in vivo effects of tPA and PAI-1 on blood vessel tone. Blood 2004; 103: 897–902.

66.

Akkawi

Nassar

Tarshis

Cines

Higazi

. LRP and αvβ3 mediate tPA activation of smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Heart Ore Physiol 2006; 291: H1351–H1359.

67.

Siao

Sung

Frohman

Milev

. The tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)/plasmin extracellular proteolytic system regulates seizure-induced hippocampal mossy fiber outgrowth through a proteoglycan substrate. J Cell Biol 2000; 148: 1295–1304.

68.

Nakagami

Abe

Nishiyama

Matsuki

. Laminin degradation by plasmin regulates long-term potentiation. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 2003–2010.

69.

Chen

Strickland

. Neuronal death in the hippocampus is promoted by plasmin-catalyzed degradation of laminin. Cell 1997; 91: 917–925.

70.

Min

Jou

Joe

. Plasminogen-induced IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha production in microglia is regulated by reactive oxygen species. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;312:969–974.

71.

Fujimoto

Katsuki

Ohnishi

Takagi

Kume

Akaike

. Plasminogen potentiates thrombin cytotoxicity and contributes to pathology of intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008; 28: 506–515.

72.

Pfefferkorn

Wiessner

Allegrini

Staufer

Vosko

Liebetrau

. Plasminogen activation in experimental permanent focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res 2000; 882: 19–25.

73.

Pfefferkorn

Staufer

Liebetrau

Bultemeier

Vosko

Zimmermann

. Plasminogen activation in focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20: 337–342.

74.

Tagaya

Haring

Stuiver

Wagner

Abumiya

Lucero

. Rapid loss of microvascular integrin expression during focal brain ischemia reflects neuron injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001; 21: 835–846.

75.

Jin

Liu

Yang

Liu

Yang

Liu

. Spatiotemporal evolution of blood brain barrier damage and tissue infarction within the first 3 h after ischemia onset. Neurobiol Dis 2012; 48: 309–316.

76.

Albayrak

Zhao

Siesjo

Smith

. Effect of transient focal ischemia on blood–brain barrier permeability in the rat: correlation to cell injury. Acta Neuropathol 1997; 94: 158–163.

77.

Chen

Indyk

Bugge

Kombrinck

Degen

Strickland

. Neuronal death and blood–brain barrier breakdown after excitotoxic injury are independent processes. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 9813–9820.

78.

Seifried

Tanswell

Ellbruck

Haerer

Schmidt

. Pharmacokinetics and haemostatic status during consecutive infusions of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost 1989; 61: 497–501.

79.

Stief

Richter

Bunder

Maisch

Renz

. Monitoring of plasmin and plasminogen activator activity in blood of patients under fibrinolytic treatment by reteplase. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2006; 12: 213–218.

80.

Benchenane

Berezowski

Fernandez-Monreal

Brillault

Valable

Dehouck

. Oxygen glucose deprivation switches the transport of tPA across the blood–brain barrier from an LRP-dependent to an increased LRP-independent process. Stroke 2005; 36: 1065–1070.

81.

Kwon

MacLeod

Zhang

Waisman

. S100A10, annexin A2, and annexin a2 heterot et ramer as candidate plasminogen receptors. Front Biosci 2005; 10: 300–325.

82.

Miles

Parmer

. Plasminogen receptors: the first quarter century. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39: 329–337.

83.

Samson

Borg

Niego

Wong

Crack

Yongqing

. A nonfibrin macromolecular cofactor for tPA-mediated plasmin generation following cellular injury. Blood 2009; 114: 1937–1946.

84.

Samson

Knaupp

Sashindranath

Borg

Cops

. Nucleocytoplasmic coagulation: an injury-induced aggregation event that disulfide crosslinks proteins and facilitates their removal by plasmin. Cell Rep 2012; 2: 889–901.

85.

Basham

Seeds

. Plasminogen expression in the neonatal and adult mouse brain. J Neurochem 2001; 77: 318–325.

86.

Taniguchi

Inoue

Morita

Nikaido

Nakashima

Nagai

. Localization of plasminogen in mouse hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and hypothalamus. Cell Tissue Res 2011; 343: 303–317.

87.

Zhang

Seiffert

Fowler

Jenkins

Thinnes

Loskutoff

. Plasminogen has a broad extrahepatic distribution. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87: 493–501.

88.

Xin

Shen

Liu

Wang

Zhang

. Increasing tPA activity in astrocytes induced by multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells facilitate neurite outgrowth after stroke in the mouse. PLoS One 2010; 5: e9027.

89.

Matsuoka

Kitamura

Taniguchi

. Induction of plasminogen in rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons by kainic acid. Neurosci Lett 1998; 252: 119–122.

90.

Sharon

Abramovitz

Miskin

. Plasminogen mRNA induction in the mouse brain after kainate excitation: codistribution with plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-2) mRNA. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2002; 104: 170–175.

91.

Ponten

Aase

Karlsson

Abramsson

Uutela

. PDGF-C is a new protease-activated ligand for the PDGF alpha-receptor. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2: 302–309.

92.

Lei

Velez

Hovland

Hirose

Kazlauskas

. Plasmin is the major protease responsible for processing PDGF-C in the vitreous of patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 42–48.

93.

Riehle

Johnson

Johansson

Bauer

Hayes

Gilbertson

. Tissue-type plasminogen activator is not necessary for platelet-derived growth factor-c activation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014; 1842: 318–325.

94.

Mackay

Corbitt

Hartzler

Thorgeirsson

. Basement membrane type IV collagen degradation: evidence for the involvement of a proteolytic cascade independent of metalloproteinases. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 5997–6001.

95.

Marchina

Barlati

. Degradation of human plasma and extracellular matrix fibronectin by tissue type plasminogen activator and urokinase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1996; 28: 1141–1150.

96.

Monea

Lehti

Keski-Oja

Mignatti

. Plasmin activates pro-matrix metalloproteinase-2 with a membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase-dependent mechanism. J Cell Physiol 2002; 192: 160–170.

97.

Makowski

Ramsby

. Binding of latent matrix metalloproteinase 9 to fibrin: activation via a plasmin-dependent pathway. Inflammation 1998; 22: 287–305.

98.

Ramos-DeSimone

Hahn-Dantona

Sipley

Nagase

French

Quigley

. Activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) via a converging plasmin/stromelysin-1 cascade enhances tumor cell invasion. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 13066–13076.

99.

Mazzieri

Masiero

Zanetta

Monea

Onisto

Garbisa

. Control of type IV collagenase activity by components of the urokinase-plasmin system: a regulatory mechanism with cell-bound reactants. EMBO J 1997; 16: 2319–2332.

100.

del Zoppo

von Kummer

Hamann

. Ischaemic damage of brain microvessels: inherent risks for thrombolytic treatment in stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 65: 1–9.

101.

Chen

Yao

Norris

Kruyer

Jno-Charles

Akhmerov

. Ablation of astrocytic laminin impairs vascular smooth muscle cell function and leads to hemorrhagic stroke. J Cell Biol 2013; 202: 381–395.

102.

Suofu

Clark

Broderick

Kurosawa

Wagner

. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 or -9 deletions protect against hemorrhagic transformation during early stage of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. Neuroscience 2012; 212: 180–189.

103.

Syrovets

Lunov

Simmet

. Plasmin as a proinflammatory cell activator. J Leukoc Biol 2012; 92: 509–519.

104.

Schaller

Gerber

. The plasmin-antiplasmin system: structural and functional aspects. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011; 68: 785–801.

105.

Schneider

Nesheim

. A study of the protection of plasmin from antiplasmin inhibition within an intact fibrin clot during the course of clot lysis. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 13333–13339.

106.

Wiman

Lijnen

Collen

. On the specific interaction between the lysine-binding sites in plasmin and complementary sites in alpha2-antiplasmin and in fibrinogen. Biochim Biophys Acta 1979; 579: 142–154.

107.

Choi

Suzuki

Kim

Wagner

Cunningham

. Protease nexin-1. Localization in the human brain suggests a protective role against extravasated serine proteases. Am J Pathol 1990; 137: 741–747.

108.

Coughlin

. Antiplasmin: the forgotten serpin? FEBS J 2005; 272: 4852–4857.

109.

Wang

Pap

Wiman

. Inactivation of antiplasmin at low pH: evidence for the formation of latent molecules. Thromb Res 2004; 114: 301–306.

110.

Simon

Xiong

. Acidotoxicity in brain ischaemia. Biochem Soc Trans 2006; 34: 1356–1361.

111.

Absher

Hendley

Jaworski

Taatjes

Sobel

. Impairment of the blood–brain barrier: a potential surrogate delineating the determinants of cerebral bleeding caused by fibrinolytic drugs. Coron Artery Dis 1999; 10: 413–420.

112.

Stewart

Kong

Novokhatny

Jesmok

Marder

. Distinct dose-dependent effects of plasmin and TPA on coagulation and hemorrhage. Blood 2003; 101: 3002–3007.

113.

Armao

Kornfeld

Estrada

Grossetete

Rosenberg

. Neutral proteases and disruption of the blood–brain barrier in rat. Brain Res 1997; 767: 259–264.

114.

Xue

Del Bigio

. Acute tissue damage after injections of thrombin and plasmin into rat striatum. Stroke 2001; 32: 2164–2169.

115.

Marder

Novokhatny

. Direct fibrinolytic agents: biochemical attributes, preclinical foundation and clinical potential. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 433–444.

116.

Marder

Landskroner

Novokhatny

Zimmerman

Kong

Kanouse

. Plasmin induces local thrombolysis without causing hemorrhage: a comparison with tissue plasminogen activator in the rabbit. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 739–745.

117.

Burggraf

Vosko

Schubert

Stassen

Hamann

. Different therapy options protecting microvasculature after experimental cerebral ischaemia and reperfusion. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 891–900.

118.

Suzuki

Nagai

Collen

. Comparative effects of microplasmin and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) on cerebral hemorrhage in a middle cerebral artery occlusion model in mice. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1617–1621.

119.

Nagy

Kolev

Csonka

Vastag

Machovich

. Perturbation of the integrity of the blood–brain barrier by fibrinolytic enzymes. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1998; 9: 471–478.

120.

Gautier

Petrault

Gele

Laprais

Bastide

Bauters

. Involvement of thrombolysis in recombinant tissue plasminogen activator-induced cerebral hemorrhages and effect on infarct volume and postischemic endothelial function. Stroke 2003; 34: 2975–2979.

121.

Nagai

De Mol

Lijnen

Carmeliet

Collen

. Role of plasminogen system components in focal cerebral ischemic infarction: a gene targeting and gene transfer study in mice. Circulation 1999; 99: 2440–2444.

122.

Yao

Tsirka

. Truncation of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 by plasmin promotes blood–brain barrier disruption. J Cell Sci 2011; 124: 1486–1495.

123.

Fujiyoshi

Hirano

Nishimura

Takahashi

Kanaide

. Plasmin induces endothelium-dependent nitric oxide-mediated relaxation in the porcine coronary artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol 2007; 27: 949–954.

124.

Weinstein

Gold

Cunningham

Gall

. Cellular localization of thrombin receptor mRNA in rat brain: expression by mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons and codistribution with prothrombin mRNA. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 2906–2919.

125.

Bartha

Domotor

Lanza

Adam-Vizi

Machovich

. Identification of thrombin receptors in rat brain capillary endothelial cells. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20: 175–182.

126.

Doeuvre

Plawinski

Goux

Vivien

Angles-Cano

. Plasmin on adherent cells: from microvesiculation to apoptosis. Biochem J 2010; 432: 365–373.

127.

Nagy

Kolev

Csonka

Pek

Machovich

. Contraction of human brain endothelial cells induced by thrombogenic and fibrinolytic factors. An in vitro cell culture model. Stroke 1995; 26: 265–270.

128.

Conforti

Dominguez-Jimenez

Ronne

Hoyer-Hansen

Dejana

. Cell-surface plasminogen activation causes a retraction of in vitro cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cell monolayer. Blood 1994; 83: 994–1005.

129.

Zhai

Acharya

Gravanis

Mehmood

Seidman

Shroyer

. Annexin A2 promotes glioma cell invasion and tumor progression. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 14346–14360.

130.

Armstead

Kiessling

Riley

Ones

Higazi

. tPA contributes to impaired NMDA cerebrovasodilation after traumatic brain injury through activation of JNK MAPK. Neurol Res 2011; 33: 726–733.

131.

Janzer

Raff

. Astrocytes induce blood–brain barrier properties in endothelial cells. Nature 1987; 325: 253–257.

132.

Dehouck

Fruchart

Cecchelli

. Upregulation of the low density lipoprotein receptor at the blood–brain barrier: intercommunications between brain capillary endothelial cells and astrocytes. J Cell Biol 1994; 126: 465–473.

133.

Liu

Honda

Kohsaka

Nakajima

. Plasminogen enhances the secretion of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 from cultured rat astrocytes. Neurosci Lett 2000; 282: 137–140.

134.

Gao

Y-J

Zhang

Samad

Suter

Yasuhiko

Z-Z

. JNK-induced MCP-1 production in spinal cord astrocytes contributes to central sensitization and neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 4096–4108.

135.

Steinberg

. The cardiovascular actions of protease-activated receptors. Mol Pharmacol 2005; 67: 2–11.

136.

Adams

Ramachandran

Yau

M-K

Suen

Fairlie

Hollenberg

. Structure, function and pathophysiology of protease activated receptors. Pharmacol Ther 2011; 130: 248–282.

137.

Kuliopulos

Covic

Seeley

Sheridan

Helin

Costello

. Plasmin desensitization of the PAR-1 thrombin receptor: kinetics, sites of truncation, and implications for thrombolytic therapy. Biochemistry 1999; 38: 4572–4585.

138.

Junge

Lee

Hubbard

Zhang

Olson

Hepler

. Protease-activated receptor-1 in human brain: localization and functional expression in astrocytes. Exp Neurol 2004; 188: 94–103.

139.

Junge

Sugawara

Mannaioni

Alagarsamy

Conn

Brat

. The contribution of protease-activated receptor 1 to neuronal damage caused by transient focal cerebral ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 13019–13024.

140.

Wang

Ubl

Reiser

. Four subtypes of protease-activated receptors, co-expressed in rat astrocytes, evoke different physiological signaling. Glia 2002; 37: 53–63.

141.

Striggow

Riek-Burchardt

Kiesel

Schmidt

Henrich-Noack

Breder

. Four different types of protease-activated receptors are widely expressed in the brain and are up-regulated in hippocampus by severe ischemia. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 14: 595–608.

142.

Greenidge

Hall

Hambleton

Thomas

Monroe

Landis

. Plasmin activation of glial cells through protease-activated receptor 1. Patholog Res Int 2013; 2013: 314709.

143.

Maeda

Nakajima

Tohyama

Kohsaka

. Characteristic response of astrocytes to plasminogen/plasmin to upregulate transforming growth factor beta 3 (TGFbeta3) production/secretion through proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) and the downstream phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt/PKB signaling cascade. Brain Res 2009; 1305: 1–13.

144.

Tran

Correale

Schreiber

Fisher

. Transforming growth factor-beta mediates astrocyte-specific regulation of brain endothelial anticoagulant factors. Stroke 1999; 30: 1671–1678.

145.

Mannaioni

Orr

Hamill

Yuan

Pedone

McCoy

. Plasmin potentiates synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function in hippocampal neurons through activation of protease-activated receptor-1. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 20600–20611.

146.

Stamatovic

Shakui

Keep

Moore

Kunkel

Van Rooijen

. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 regulation of blood–brain barrier permeability. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005; 25: 593–606.

147.

Dimitrijevic

Stamatovic

Keep

Andjelkovic

. Effects of the chemokine CCL2 on blood–brain barrier permeability during ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006; 26: 797–810.

148.

Stamatovic

Keep

Kunkel

Andjelkovic

. Potential role of MCP-1 in endothelial cell tight junction ‘opening’: signaling via Rho and Rho kinase. J Cell Sci 2003; 116: 4615–4628.

149.

Stamatovic

Dimitrijevic

Keep

Andjelkovic

. Protein kinase Calpha-RhoA cross-talk in CCL2-induced alterations in brain endothelial permeability. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 8379–8388.

150.

Sheehan

Zhou

Gravanis

Rogove

Bogenhagen

. Proteolytic activation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by plasmin underlies excitotoxic neurodegeneration in mice. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 1738–1745.

151.

Yao

Tsirka

. The C terminus of mouse monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) mediates MCP1 dimerization while blocking its chemotactic potency. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 31509–31516.

152.

Niego

Medcalf

. Improved method for the preparation of a human cell-based, contact model of the blood–brain barrier. J Vis Exp 2013; 12: 81.

153.

Reijerkerk

Kooij

van der Pol

SMA

Leyen

van het Hof

Couraud

P-O

. Tissue-type plasminogen activator is a regulator of monocyte diapedesis through the brain endothelial barrier. J Immunol 2008; 181: 3567–3574.

Plasmin-Dependent Modulation of the Blood–Brain Barrier: A Major Consideration during tPA-Induced Thrombolysis?

Abstract

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

TISSUE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR AND THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER

Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator and the Nonischemic Blood–Brain Barrier

Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator and the Ischemic Blood–Brain Barrier; Observations, Resolutions and Experimental Limitations

The Role of Endogenous Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator

Modes of Action

IS THERE A CASE FOR PLASMIN AT THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER?

Exposure of the Blood–Brain Barrier to Plasmin During Stroke and Thrombolysis

Conceptual Links Between Plasmin Activity and Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption

Can Plasmin Escape Natural Inhibition?

EFFECTS OF PLASMINOGEN AND PLASMIN ON THE BBB IN VIVO

Plasmin Administration into the Brain Parenchyma

Systemic Plasmin and Plasminogen Administration in Normal and Ischemic Conditions

Experiments in Plasminogen Knockout Mice

MECHANISMS FOR BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER MODULATION BY PLASMIN

Plasmin Actions on Brain Endothelial Cells

Plasmin Activation of Astrocytes

Rho-Kinase- and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1-Dependent Pathways

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Footnotes

References