Abstract
Objective
Five of 400 starters of the 2009 Western States Endurance Run (WSER) were hospitalized with hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis. This article explores the risk factors associated with development of hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis.
Methods
Data on the 5 cases were collected retrospectively from the runners and medical records, and all race participants were invited to complete a post-race survey. Characteristics of the cases were compared with the other race participants.
Results
The 5 runners developing hyponatremia with rhabdomyloysis were men with a mean (±SD) age of 39 ± 7 years. Presenting complaints included neurological symptoms among 3 and nausea among 3. Compared with those runners not developing hyponatremia with rhabdomyolysis, the cases tended to be younger, faster, more likely to have sustained an injury which interfered with training prior to the race, and were more likely to use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during the race. The 3 of 5 cases progressing to acute renal failure were characterized by higher initial blood urea nitrogen (BUN; 43–69 vs 18–23 mg/dL) and creatinine (2.8–4.9 vs 1.1–1.2 mg/dL) levels but were not distinguished by creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) concentrations.
Conclusions
Over 1% of participants in the 2009 WSER were hospitalized with hyponatremia in combination with rhabdomyolysis. These individuals tended to be younger, faster, more likely to have had an injury that interfered with training, and more likely to have used NSAIDs during the race. Higher initial BUN and creatinine levels, but not CPK concentrations, distinguished those 3 who progressed to acute renal failure.
Introduction
Only a handful of cases of exertional rhabdomyolysis in combination with exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH) have been reported to date. Lang 1 reported on a single case from the 1982 Western States Endurance Run (WSER) while Putterman et al 2 reported another singular occurrence in a hiker 11 years later. More recently, Ellis et al 3 reported on four cases following a single 153-km mountain footrace, while Glace and Murphy reported on a case of critical hyponatremia in a half-marathon runner who subsequently developed rhabdomyolysis secondary to combative behavior and seizure activity secondary to hyponatremic encephalopathy. 4 Four of these 7 reported cases (57%) suffered renal impairment secondary to rhabdomyolysis, while 6 (86%) of these total cases presented with mental status changes secondary to hyponatremia. Thus, this relatively high percentage of medical complications underscores the potential for increased morbidity when these 2 exercise-associated conditions coexist.
The simultaneous presentation of EAH and rhabdomyolysis creates a complicated and opposing treatment paradox with regard to fluid resuscitation. The appropriate management of EAH is either water restriction (in mild cases without neurological symptoms) or administration of a concentrated intravenous bolus of hypertonic saline (in severe cases with encephalopathy) to offset life-threatening cerebral edema. 5 Conversely, the appropriate treatment for rhabdomyolysis is aggressive intravenous isotonic fluid administration to prevent myoglobin buildup in the kidneys and prevent acute renal failure (ARF). 5 Therefore, field and hospital clinicians must delicately balance aggressive fluid resuscitation with mindful fluid restriction when treating symptomatic athletes presenting with such complex pathophysiologies as EAH with rhabdomyolysis.
Whether or not the combination of EAH plus rhabdomyolysis is causal or an independent association is currently under debate. According to one causal perspective, EAH may facilitate rhabdomyolysis through changes in intracellular potassium and/or calcium concentrations or through hypotonic cell swelling, both of which destabilize the muscle cell membrane and facilitate lysis. 3 Conversely, pronounced lysis of muscle cells from unaccustomed physical exertion6,7 and/or significant thermal strain8,9 could lead to third spacing of fluids, which in turn can stimulate arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion and facilitate EAH. 3
As mentioned above, whether or not a more causal relationship exists between EAH and rhabdomyolysis cannot be delineated from these few case reports. However, in the present analysis, we aim to expose possible biochemical, demographic, training, and symptomatic risk factors in runners who developed simultaneous EAH and rhabdomyolysis during an ultramarathon footrace to better explore this association. We seek to uncover such “trends” by examining our small cluster of cases alone and against the larger cohort of 2009 WSER runners who did not develop the combination of EAH and rhabdomyolysis.
Methods
This case series derives from the 2009 WSER, a 161-km ultramarathon run. The WSER course is run almost entirely on single-track mountain trials with 5500 m of cumulative climb and 7000 m of cumulative descent. Twenty-four aid stations were stocked with various fluids and nutritional items as well as salt tablets. There were no official records kept of what each participant ingested. Participants had 30 hours to complete the race to be considered an official finisher. Local race-day ambient temperature ranged between 15°C and 37°C.
Five documented cases of hyponatremia combined with rhabdomyolysis were identified from follow-up of those who were known to have received medical care during the event, and from responses to an electronic appeal sent out to all race starters by the WSER Race Director inquiring if any runners suffered any serious medical problems or were hospitalized as a consequence of race participation. Data from all 5 identified cases were collected retrospectively from hospital records plus personal (e-mail and telephone) interviews by 1 investigator (M.D.H.) within 3 weeks of race finish. The Institutional Review Board of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System approved the reporting of cases through waiver of consent.
Initial biochemical values (blood sodium, potassium, blood urea nitrogen [BUN], creatinine, creatine phosphokinase [CPK]) represent the first value obtained, either from the medical tent or in the hospital. The diagnosis of ARF in this case series was based on an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dL above a presumed normal baseline or a glomerular filtration rate below 75% of the lower limit of normal. 10 Body weight changes were all self-reported from serial measurements that were required at race registration, the finish and 9 checkpoints along the course. Weight measurements during the race were used to enforce the WSER weight loss policy in place at the time, which required forced rest and rehydration for a weight loss of 5% to 7%.
In addition to the retrospective data collected on the 5 cases of hyponatremia combined with rhabdomyolysis, all 2009 WSER entries were sent an email as part of a larger demographic study (approved by the same Institutional Review Board) the day after the race inviting their participation in an electronic survey. Among other questions, runners were asked to indicate whether they had used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during the race, the number of prior 161-km running races they had completed, and whether or not an injury within the past year had interfered significantly with their training. All finishers were also offered blood CPK testing at the finish as part of the routine medical services provided. These data were used to compare the 5 cases of hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis with the remainder of the race participants. The variables of age, finish time, and prior number of 161-km races completed were examined with unpaired t tests and Cohen's effect sizes. Fisher's exact tests were used for comparing the incidence of NSAID use and presence of previous injury in the last year. Statistical significance was set at P <.05.
Results
There were 400 official starters in the 2009 Western States Endurance Run (19% women) with 240 official finishers (20% women). Mean (±SD) finishing time was 26.2 ± 3.4 hours (27.3 ± 3.2 for women and 26.0 ± 3.4 for men).
Description of Cases
Cases no. 1 and 4 were seen, treated and discharged from the medical tent. Case no. 1 presented with emesis, dizziness, lightheadedness, cough, and dark urine, and case no. 4 presented with dizziness, lightheadedness, and anuria. Both were treated with intravenous normal saline but then presented to the hospital within 24 hours with thigh pain and dark urine (case no. 1) and weight gain and anuria (case no. 4). Cases no. 3 and 5 were transported by ambulance after completing 150 km with exhaustion, confusion, severe thigh pain, dark urine, and nausea (case no. 3) and exhaustion, thigh pain, and incontinence of dark urine (case no. 5). The remaining case (no. 2) presented to the hospital 1 day after finishing the race with continued nausea and flank pain.
The five runners who developed hyponatremia with rhabdomyolysis were all male. Four cases (no. 1, 2, 4, and 5) used NSAIDs during the race. Three cases exhibited neurological symptoms at presentation (no. 1, 3, and 4), and 3 of the cases progressed to ARF (no. 1, 2, and 4). The biochemical characteristics of the 5 cases are presented in Table 1.
Initial biochemical values (and range of values during treatment) in all 5 hospitalized cases of hyponatremia with rhabdomyolysis competing in the 2009 Western States Endurance Run
All 3 runners progressing to ARF finished the race, while the 2 runners who did not progress to ARF did not finish and were transported by ambulance directly off course to the hospital. When compared with the 2 subjects who did not progress to ARF, the 3 runners progressing to ARF had a tendency to be younger and were more likely to have lost body weight during the race (weight changes were −4%, −3%, and +3% vs +5% and 0%) (Table 2). Those progressing to ARF also had higher initial BUN and creatinine concentrations.
Demographics, training history, symptoms, weight change, and biochemical values in hospitalized cases of hyponatremia with rhabdomyolysis who did (n = 3) and did not (n = 2) progress to acute renal failure after the 2009 Western States Endurance Run
Data are presented as mean ± SD, range or percentage.
Comparison of Cases with other Runners
Excluding the 5 cases of hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis, 244 men who started the race completed the post-race survey (76% response rate). Of these responders 158 finished the race (65%), which was similar to the overall finish rate among men of 59%.
Table 3 displays the comparison between the 5 cases and other men who completed the post-race survey for age, finish time, number of prior 161-km ultramarathon finishes, NSAID use during the race, and history of injury in the previous year that interfered with training. Statistical significance was not reached for any of these variables, although the P value for age was .07. Effect sizes were .8 (large) and .4 (medium) for age and finish time, respectively. Therefore, the 5 runners with documented hyponatremia and rhabdomyloysis appeared to have a collective tendency to be younger, faster, more likely to use NSAIDs and more likely to have suffered from an injury within the past year that significantly affected their ability to train.
Comparison of cases of hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis (n = 5) with other male starters (non-cases) of the 2009 Western States Endurance Run who completed the post-race survey (n = 244)
Finish time data represent the 3 finishers among the cases and the 158 survey responders who finished the race for the non-cases. Data are presented as mean ± SD and range, or percentage.
Aside from our cases of hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis, 59 men had CPK measurements at the finish. Of those, 12 (20%) had CPK concentrations >38 218 U/L, the lowest initial value of the three cases progressing to ARF.
Discussion
Both EAH and rhabdomyolysis-induced ARF are life-threatening conditions. Current and historic consensus suggests that EAH is largely associated with overhydration 5 while ARF is commonly associated with volume depletion. 8 ,11,12 These associations would collectively suggest that this pathophysiological combination would not only be paradoxical but an extremely rare event. Thus, in contrast to the apparent paradox, this report represents the largest cluster of EAH with rhabdomyolysis documented within a single athletic event to date. Although the small sample size limits the statistical findings, a few trends appear to emerge that may assist in the identification of possible risk factors that may characterize those runners predisposed to developing this complex and unusual combination.
Compared to the overall 2009 WSER cohort of men who were not hospitalized with EAH and rhabdomyolysis, the 5 men who developed this significant medical combination were younger (by about 7 years), faster (by about 2 hours), and more likely to have suffered a significant injury which curtailed proper training (a 24% higher frequency) (Table 3). Collectively, these traits would suggest that the hospitalized runners were relatively undertrained but highly motivated to complete their predetermined goal. Such mental and physical attributes could potentially facilitate the development of significant rhabdomyolysis from an overpowering mental determination to override physical discomfort leading to exceptional skeletal muscle breakdown that is already commonly associated with extreme running events. 13 -15 Thus, the rhabdomyolysis could have facilitated oliguria and ARF, 16 which may have secondarily led to an accompanying dilutional hyponatremia.
Conversely, the 5 cases of EAH with rhabdomyolysis requiring hospitalization appeared more likely to have ingested NSAIDs (30% higher frequency) during the race compared with the collective cohort of male 2009 WSER runners (Table 3). NSAIDs have been reported to potentiate the action of AVP at the collecting duct of the kidney. 17 Additionally, 3 of the cases reported nausea. Nausea is one of the most powerful known non-osmotic stimuli to AVP secretion. 18 Collectively, these 2 factors could potentially facilitate the development of EAH as a variant of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). Thus, it is also plausible that SIADH-induced hyponatremia facilitated muscle cell membrane instability leading to concomitant rhabdomyolysis as the primary pathophysiological mechanism, as hypothesized in the polydipsic psychiatric population. 19
It may be speculated that the 3 runners who subsequently pushed themselves to finish the race (and later developed ARF) may have incurred greater skeletal muscle damage by completing the maximal distance. However, the CPK results would refute this possibility. In general, the initial CPK values did not appear higher in the finishers than the nonfinishers, with the exception of case no. 1 who had a peak CPK of 785 250 U/L. In addition, 20% of those undergoing CPK measurements and not requiring hospitalization had concentrations higher than the lowest value of the 3 cases developing ARF. It has been emphasized that neither the presence 13 -15 or severity20,21 of CPK levels associated with exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis have predictive value in either clinical outcome or progression to ARF,22,23 although CPK levels have been shown to be a predictor of clinical course in nonexercising scenarios. 24 Our findings are consistent with the former premise. Nonetheless, the subset of runners who went on to develop ARF compared with those who did not develop ARF displayed clear signs of renal compromise through higher initial BUN (43–69 vs 18–23 mg/dL) and creatinine (2.8–4.9 vs 1.1–1.2 mg/dL) values, irrespective of the underlying cause.
One obvious difference between those runners who did or did not develop ARF is that each of the runners progressing to ARF finished the race and left the event (rather than being transported directly to the hospital) before voluntarily presenting to the emergency room within the next 24 hours when their symptomatology had not improve or had worsened. Thus, the impact of early aggressive treatment in the hospital may have prevented the progression to ARF in the 2 nonfinishers. 25 The 2 runners who did not progress to ARF also reported weight gain or stable weight during the run opposed to 2 of the 3 runners who progressed to ARF. This may also suggest that the runners who did not develop ARF were overhydrated.
Our attempt to uncover trends to elucidate risk factors towards possible pathophysiological mechanisms associated with the development of EAH with rhabdomyolysis (and progression to ARF) is important for the creation of preventative strategies for future ultramarathon runners. The absence of women developing this “rare” combination in this particular case series likely reflects the overall ratio of females to males (1:5) who started and finished this race, as women have developed EAH with rhabdomyolysis in previous reports.3,4
The most appropriate treatment strategy in the field and hospital setting has not been determined. In this cluster of 5 cases we are limited not only in our inability to delineate a causal relationship between EAH and rhabdomyolysis but also by the various treatments each runner received over a varying clinical course and timeline. It is important to note that one consistent feature was that all 5 cases received intravenous normal saline as part of their initial treatment; cases no. 1 and 4 at the finish line, cases no. 3 and 5 upon transfer from the 150-km mark to the hospital, and case no. 2 the following day upon hospital presentation. Based on our current understanding, we recommend extreme caution in the use of intravenous normal saline as the initial treatment of athletes with combined EAH and rhabdomyolysis, particularly if there are any symptoms suggestive of cerebral encephalopathy, which might be expected to worsen with the use of normal saline alone. We suspect that the present cases had satisfactory outcomes with intravenous normal saline because they did not have impending cerebral encephalopathy. Clearly, further work is required to clarify optimal management of these types of cases.
In a follow-up investigation, we aim to administer 100-mL boluses of 3% hypertonic saline to runners with documented EAH to determine if this strategy elicits a rapid return to normonatremia and reduces the incidence of ARF in those with concomitant rhabdomyloysis subsequently treated with copious isotonic saline administration.
Limitations to this small retrospective cohort study include the fact that we were required to rely on self-reported body weights from multiple scales for which accuracy was unknown. Details on fluid and nutrition intake during the event, and the extent of heat acclimatization among the runners were also unknown.
In conclusion, 5 runners (1% of the starting field) participating in the 2009 161-km WESR were admitted to the hospital with EAH in combination with rhabdomyolysis. These hospitalized runners had a tendency towards being younger, faster, having sustained a previous injury which interfered with their training, and being more likely to ingest NSAIDs than those male competitors who did not develop this disorder. We suggest that clinicians be aware that EAH and rhabdomyolysis may coexist in athletes participating in ultramarathon footraces and be mindful that the treatment for each entity is different and theoretically contradictory.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Greg Soderlund, the Race Director of the Western States Endurance Run, for his assistance in identifying the cases reported here, and the runners who have shared of themselves to advance the safety of the sport.
Presented at the American College of Sports Medicine annual meeting, June 2, 2010, Baltimore, MD.
