BehrS.C.CourtierJ.L.QayyumA.Imaging of Müllerian duct anomaliesRadiographics2012; 32:E233–E250.
3.
The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesionsFertil Steril1988; 49:944–955.
4.
JaslowC.R.Uterine factorsObstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America2014; 41:57–86.
5.
ImaokaI.WadaA.MatsuoM.MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and managementRadiographics2003; 23:1401–1421.
6.
RennellC.L.T-shaped uterus in diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposureAJR Am J Roentgenol1979; 132:979–980.
7.
MuellerG.C.HussainH.K.SmithY.R.Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosisAJR Am J Roentgenol2007; 189:1294–1302.
8.
BermejoC.Martinez TenP.CantareroR.Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imagingUltrasound Obstet Gynecol2010; 35:593–601.
9.
GhiT.CasadioP.KulevaM.Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and classification of congenital uterine anomaliesFertil Steril2009; 92:808–813.
10.
AllenJ.W.CardallS.KittijarukhajornM.Incidence of ovarian maldescent in women with Müllerian duct anomalies: evaluation by MRIAJR Am J Roentgenol2012; 198:W381–W385.
11.
ButtramV.C.Jr.GibbonsW.E.Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification. (An analysis of 144 cases)Fertil Steril1979; 32:40–46.
12.
OmbeletW.VerswijvelG.de JongeE.Ectopic ovary and unicornuate uterusN Engl J Med2003; 348:667–668.
13.
DabirashrafiH.MohammadK.Moghadami-TabriziN.Ovarian malposition in women with uterine anomaliesObstet Gynecol1994; 83:293–294.
14.
DykesT.M.SiegelC.DodsonW.Imaging of congenital uterine anomalies: review and self-assessment moduleAJR Am J Roentgenol2007; 189:S1–S10.