De ZordoTvon LutterottiKDejacoCComparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: high-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CTEur Radiol2012; 22:279–286.
5.
de BrouckerTPontanaFSantangeloTSingle- and dual-source chest CT protocols: Levels of radiation dose in routine clinical practiceDiagn Interv Imaging2012; 93:852–858.
6.
HoLMYoshizumiTTHurwitzLMDual energy versus single energy MDCT: measurement of radiation dose using adult abdominal imaging protocolsAcad Radiol2009; 16:1400–1407.
7.
National Lung Screening Trial Research TeamAberleD.R.AdamsA.M.Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screeningN Engl J Med2011; 365:395–409.
8.
KalraM.MaherM.TothT.Comparison of z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvisRadiology2004; 232:347–353.
9.
KalraM.K.RizzoS.MaherM.M.Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation doseRadiology2005; 237:303–308.
10.
SchinderaS.T.NelsonR.C.YoshizumiT.Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom studyAcad Radiol2009; 16:997–1002.
FleischmannD.BoasF.E.Computed tomography: old ideas and new technologyEur Radiol2011; 21:510–517.
13.
NelsonRCFeuerleinSBollDTNew iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages?J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr2011; 5:286–292.
14.
O'NeillS.B.McLaughlinP.D.CrushL.A prospective feasibility study of sub-millisievert abdominopelvic CT using iterative reconstruction in Crohn's diseaseEur Radiol2013; 23:2503–2512.
15.
SinghS.KalraM.K.DoS.Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomenJ Comput Assist Tomogr2012; 36:347–353.
16.
DuanXWangJLengSElectronic noise in CT detectors: impact on image noise and artifactsAJR Am J Roentgenol2013; 201:W626–32.