Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devicesReport of a WHO Scientific GroupWorld Health Organ Tech Rep Ser1987; 753:1–91
2.
Harrison-WoolrychM.AshtonJ.CoulterD.Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported?Contraception2003; 67:53–56
3.
SentilhesL.Lefebvre-LacoeuilleC.PoilblancM.Incidental finding of an intrauterine device in the sigmoid colonEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care2008; 13:212–214
4.
HessT.StepanowB.KnoppM.V.Safety of intrauterine contraceptive devices during MR imagingEur Radiol1996; 6:66–68
5.
ZiemanM.KanalE.CopperT.380A IUD and magnetic resonance imagingContraception2007; 75:93–95
MederosR.HumaranL.MinerviniD.Surgical removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case reportInt J Surg2008; 6:e60–e62
8.
NcebozU.S.OzcakirH.T.UyarY.Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the sigmoid colon: a case reportEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care2003; 8:229–232
9.
ChenC.P.HsuT.C.WangW.Ileal penetration by a Multiload-Cu 375 intrauterine contraceptive device. A case report with review of the literatureContraception1998; 58:295–304
10.
ZakinD.SternW.Z.RosenblattR.Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing stringObstet Gynecol Surv1981; 36:335–353
