Across a lifetime, consumers face many transitions in which they need social support. Difficult transitions are often fraught with challenges, such as transitioning from one social role to another. But social support is particularly important for consumers in liminality when they are caught between social roles failing to transition from an old to a new role. Consumers in liminality benefit if they can draw on social networks for support to help them complete their transition. In this study, we explored how one form of sharing—trading skills and services in an exchange network—provides consumers with important social support helping them to cope and transition into new social roles. Specifically, a sharing exchange network helps consumers draw emotional, cognitive, and material support that enhances their well-being and has some advantages over social support from family and friends.
Abdul-GhaniE., HydeK.F., & MarshallR. (2019). Conceptualising engagement in a consumer-to-consumer context. Austr. Market. J., 27 (1), 2–13.
2.
AbiGhannamN., & AtkinsonL. (2016). Good green mothers consuming their way through pregnancy: roles of environmental identities and information seeking in coping with the transition. Consumpt. Market. Culture, 19 (5), 451–474.
3.
BardhiF., & EckhardtG.M. (2012). Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. J. Consum. Res., 39 (4), 881–898.
4.
BelkR. (2014). You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res., 67 (8), 1595–1600.
5.
BelkR. (2009). Sharing. J. Consum. Res., 36 (February), 715–734.
6.
BelkR.W., WallendorfM., & SherryJ.F.Jr, (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: theodicy on the odyssey. J. Consum. Res., 16 (June), 1–38.
7.
BlichfeldtB.S. & GramM. (2013). Lost in transition? Student food consumption. Higher Educ., 65 (3), 277–289.
8.
BounckenR.B., & ReuschlA.J. (2018). Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Rev. Manag. Sci., 12 (1), 317–343.
BurroughsJ., & RindfleischA. (1997). Materialism as a coping mechanism: an inquiry into family disruption. In BrucksA., & MacInnisD. J. (Eds.), NA – Advances in Consumer Research, 24, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 89–97.
11.
CappelliniB., & YenA.W.Y. (2016). A space of one's own: spatial and identity liminality in an online community of mothers. J. Market. Manag., 32 (13–14), 1260–1283.
12.
CollumE., LaskerJ., & KyriacouC. (2012). Equal Time, Equal Value: Community Currencies & Timebanking in the US. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.Equal Time, Equal Value: Community Currencies & Timebanking in the US
13.
Côté-ArsenaultD., BrodyD., & DombeckM.T. (2009). Pregnancy as a rite of passage: liminality, rituals & communitas. J. Prenatal Perinatal Psychol. Health, 24 (2), 69–87.
14.
Del MoralL., & PaisI. (2015). Collaborative economy and the digitalization of timebanking: opportunities and Challenges. Studi. Sociol., 53 (1), 3–21.
15.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S., (Eds.) (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3 rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
DunbarJ. (2009). Hillside time share. The Press, August 27, 3–7.
17.
GentinaE., HoggM.K., & SakashitaM. (2017). Identity (re)construction through sharing: a study of mother and teenage daughter dyads in France and Japan. J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 37, 67–77.
18.
GibbonsS.W., RossA., & BevansM. (2014). Liminality as a conceptual frame for understanding the family caregiving rite of passage: an integrative review. Res. Nurs. Health, 37 (5), 423–436.
19.
GottliebB.H., & BergenA. (2010). Social support concepts and measures. J. Psychosom. Res., 69(5), 511–520.
20.
GriswoldA. (2013). Digital detectives and virtual volunteers: integrating emergent online communities into disaster response operations. J. Bus. Contin. Emer. Plan., 7 (1), 13–25.
21.
GuestG., BunceA., & JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18 (1), 59–82.
22.
HelgesonV. (2003). Social support and quality of life. Q. Life Res., 12, 25–31.
23.
HemetsbergerA., BauerM., von WallpachS., & BrogerK. (2013). On transit changes of role identity and consumer-brand relationships during transition from student to professional life. Market. ZFP, 35(1), 40–49.
Kennett-HenselP.A., SneathJ.Z., & LaceyR. (2012). Liminality and consumption in the aftermath of a natural disaster. J. Consum. Market., 29 (1), 52–63.
29.
KlyverK., HonigB., & SteffensP. (2018). Social support timing and persistence in nascent entrepreneurship: exploring when instrumental and emotional support is most effective. Small Bus. Econ., 51 (3), 709–734.
30.
KozinetsR. (2002). Can consumers escape the market? Emancipatory illuminations from burning man. J. Consum. Res., 29 (1), 20–38.
31.
MarcouxJ.S. (2009). Escaping the gift economy. J. Consum. Res., 36 (December), 671–685.
32.
McAlexanderJ.H. (1991). Divorce, the disposition of the relationship, and everything, In HolmanR.H., & SolomonM.R. (Eds.), NA – Advances in Consumer Research, 18, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 43–48.
33.
McAlexanderJ.H., SchoutenJ.W., & RobertsS.D. (1992). Consumer behaviour in coping strategies for divorce. In SherryJ.F.Jr., & SternthalB. (Eds.), NA – Advances in Consumer Research, 19, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 555–556.
34.
MenaF.J., PadillaA.M., & MaldonadoM. (1987). Acculturative stress and specific coping strategies among immigrant and later generation college students. Hisp. J. Behav. Sci., 9, 207–225.
35.
NguyenT., & BelkR.W. (2013). Harmonization processes and relational meanings in constructing Asian weddings. J. Consum. Res., 40 (July), 518–538.
36.
NobleC.H., & WalkerB.A. (1997). Exploring the relationships among liminal transitions, symbolic consumption, and the extended self. Psychol. Market., 14, 29–47.
37.
NoyC. (2008). Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol, 11 (4), 327–344.
38.
OgleJ., TynerK., & Schofield-TomschinS. (2013). The role of maternity dress consumption in shaping the self and identity during the liminal transition of pregnancy. J. Consum. Culture, 13 (2) 119–139.
OzanneL.K., & BallantineP.W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption: an examination of toy library users. J. Consum. Behav., 9, 485–498.
41.
OzanneL.K., & OzanneJ.L. (2011). A child's right to play: the social construction of civic virtues in toy libraries. J. Publ. Policy Market., 30 (2), 264–278.
42.
OzanneL.K., & OzanneJ.L. (2016). How alternative consumer markets can build community resiliency. Eur. J. Mark., 50 (3/4), 330–357.
43.
OzanneL.K. (2010). Learning to exchange time: benefits and obstacles to timebanking. Int. J. Commun. Curr. Res., 14, A1–16.
44.
PantherJ. (2012). ‘It Ain't What You Do (It's the Way That You Do it)': Reciprocity, Co-Operation and Spheres of Exchange in Two Community Currency Systems in the North of England. Durham theses, Durham University.
45.
PapaoikonomouE., & ValorC. (2016). Exploring commitment in peer-to-peer exchanges: the case of timebanks. J. Market. Manag., 32 (13–14), 1333–1358.
46.
PettigrewS., AndersonL., BolandW., de La VilleV.I., FifitaI.M.E., Fosse-GomezM.H., KindtM., LuukkanenL., MartinI., OzanneL.K., PirouzD.M., ProtheroA., & StovallT. (2014). The experience of risk in families: conceptualisations and implications for transformative consumer research. J. Market. Manag., 30, 1772–1799.
47.
PrasslJ., & RisakM. (2016). Uber, taskrabbit, and co.: platforms as employers rethinking the legal analysis of crowdwork. Comparat. Labor Law Policy J., 37(3), 619–652.
48.
RuthJ.A., & HsiungR.O. (2007). A family systems interpretation of how subsistence consumers manage: the case of South Africa, product and market development for subsistence marketplaces. Adv. Int. Manag., 20, 59–87.
49.
SchoutenJ.W. (1991). Selves in transition: symbolic consumption in personal rites of passage and identity reconstruction. J. Consum. Res., 17 (4), 412–425.
50.
ScottR., CaylaJ., & CovaB. (2017). Selling pain to the saturated self. J. Consum. Res., 44 (1), 22–43.
51.
SeyfangG. (2004). Time banks: rewarding community self-help in the inner city? Commun. Dev. J., 39 (1), 62–71.
52.
SimE. (2010). Timebank takes off. Coast Mail, April 17, 5.
53.
SteinbergM., & GottliebB.H. (1994). The appraisal of spousal support by women facing conflicts between work and family. In BurlesonB.R., AlbrechtT.L., & SarasonI.G. (Eds.), Communication of Social Support: Messages, Interactions, Relationships, and Community (pp. 152–172). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
ThompsonC.J. (1997). Interpreting consumers: a hermeneutical framework for deriving marketing insights from the texts of consumers’ consumption stories. J. Consum. Res., 34, 438–455.
55.
ThomsenT.U., & SørensenE.B. (2006). The first four-wheeled status symbol: pram consumption as a vehicle for the construction of motherhood identity. J. Market. Manag., 22 (9/10), 907–927.
56.
TurleyD., & O'Donohoe, S. (2017). Mortality, morality and the marketplace: empathetic improvisation and the double duty of care in service encounters with bereaved consumers. Consumpt. Market. Culture, 20 (5), 456–476.O'DonohoeS.
57.
TurnerV.W. (1967). The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual
58.
van GennepA. (1909/1960). The Rites of Passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
GroupVoice. (2010). Buying into motherhood? Problematic consumption and ambivalence in transitional phases. Consumpt. Market. Culture, 13 (4), 373–397.
60.
WilliamsC.C. (2004), Informal volunteering: some lessons from the United Kingdom, J. Policy Anal. Manag., 23 (3), 613–616.
61.
YapS., & KapitanS. (2017). Consumption, coping and life transitions: an integrative review. Austr. Market. J., 25(3), 194–205.
