Abstract
Combinatorial chemistry is now widely used to synthesize large numbers of new chemical entities. New methods have been developed for early-stage pharma-cokinetic tests, to help decide which molecules have the properties required to make them efficacious and successful in the marketplace. Of the various physicochemical tests that are used to assess ADME, pKa (aqueous ionization constant) is the key to understanding how other properties will be affected by pH. A new method is described for rapid measurement of pKa of samples drawn from 96 well DMSO stock solutions.
Introduction - Why pKa is Important
It is widely recognized that new molecules require appropriate ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) properties if they are to be developed into successful drugs. The ADME of ionizable drugs is greatly influenced by their pKa values, which influence their transport properties (absorption and distribution), and the excretion of metabolites. The pKa values are often measured during a process of
At least 60-70% of drugs undergo acid-base ionization in aqueous solution, 2 which influences their binding characteristics, and has a profound effect on their other physicochemical properties including lipophilicity, permeability, and solubility.
During drug discovery, a molecule may be found which has a biological effect related to a particular structural feature. Chemists will then try to enhance the biological effect by modifying the structure, often by substituting ionizable groups. During this process of modification, the structural changes will lead to changes in solubility, lipophilicity, and permeability. Table 1 describes some important physicochemical parameters, the values of which are all pKa-dependent for ionizable drugs. The following case studies further illustrate the importance of pKa values in ADME.
Some physicochemical properties used in ADME studies.
Many basic drugs are absorbed in the intestine, where the pH may vary between 5 and 8 depending on which part of the intestine is considered, and whether the patient is in the fed or fasted state (food raises the pH of the stomach, but reduces the pH of the intestine). Itraconazole (marketed as Sporanox) is an antifungal drug that may be taken orally. Patients are advised to take itraconazole with meals, when the pH of the intestine contents may go down to 5 or below. The wall of the intestine is shielded from the intestine contents by a layer of mucus. The pH at the wall itself is around 6, and not greatly affected by the pH of the intestine contents. Itraconazole is a base with a pKa of 3.7, and log P greater than 5. At high pH it is not ionized and is almost insoluble. It ionizes at low pH, and is rather more soluble at pH 5 than at pH 6. At pH 5 some compound can dissolve in the intestine contents. This enables it to approach the wall, where it will be transformed into the neutral form that is more easily absorbed.
Sildenafil is a vasodilator, and is marketed under the name Viagra. This molecule is an ampholyte, meaning that it has two pKas, one acidic and one basic. The acidic pKa is 9.12, and the basic pKa is 6.78. 3 While this molecule is charged at low and high pH, it is neutral at mid-range pH, and therefore exists in its most lipophilic form (logP = 3.18) at intestinal pH; this enhances its absorbance in the GI tract.
MEASURING pKa VALUES
The aqueous ionization constant of a molecule is denoted by its pKa value/s, where pKa is equivalent to the pH at which a given ionizable group on the molecule is half-ionized.
Traditionally, it has required a lot of skill to measure pKa values. First, methods are required for monitoring the state of ionization of the molecule during conditions of changing pH. Then, methods must be devised to interpret the experimental data, taking full account of the theory of chemical equilibria, and the complications introduced by poor sample solubility and overlapping pKa values.
A classical method for measuring pKa values is potentiometric titration with results calculated from the shape of the titration curve. Another method is to measure UV absorbance at each pH point of the titration curve, and calculate results from the change in UV absorption as a function of pH. 4 Both these methods call for pH to be measured at between 30-40 different values throughout the titration. A third method is capillary electrophoresis in several different buffer solutions with results calculated from the relative mobilities at different pH. 5 While powerful, none of these methods is particularly fast.
Sirius, a world leader in instrumentation for pKa measurement, has recently developed a new automated instrument (ProfilerSGA - Figure 1) for rapid measurement of pKa values of samples supplied in 10mM solution in DMSO in 96-well microtiter plates. ProfilerSGA uses a new technique called pH Gradient Titration,6,7 in which two multi-component buffer solutions are mixed together to create a pH gradient flowing through a tube. The buffer components have been chosen such that their UV absorbance is negligible above 250nm, and they have been formulated such that the pH change in the gradient is linear with time. The buffers used for the validation study shown in Figure 3 contained various concentrations of boric acid, tris (hydroxymethyl) methylamine, butylamine, citric acid, and potassium dihydrogen phosphate. Samples are injected at constant speed into the flowing pH gradient, and the solution passed through a flow cell in a diode-array UV spectrophotometer, as depicted in Figure 2.

Photograph of Sirius ProfilerSGA instrument for rapid measurement of pKa values.

Results of a study of 75 drugs with one, two or three pKas (112 in total) comparing pKa values measured by the pH gradient technique with measured pKa values reported in the literature.
In a typical assay using the Sirius ProfilerSGA, the user will create a spreadsheet listing the well position of each compound in the run, along with its ID and the expected number of pKa values, if known. This number may be obtained by inspecting the structure manually, or by using a predictive software package. The spreadsheet is used by the instrument control software to set up the assay. The instrument takes approximately seven hours to run a tray containing 96 samples. Typically, 20μL of sample is diluted to 2mL, and the diluted sample is injected into an “up” gradient (pH 2 to 12) and a “down” gradient (pH 12 to 2). Samples can be diluted automatically by the instrument, or diluted samples can be prepared off line.
After the assays have been run, the data are analyzed by the refinement software. Spectra from up and down titrations should be identical for samples that remain in solution at all pHs. For poorly soluble samples, spectra must be used only from titrations in which samples started in solution. Results for poorly soluble basic samples should therefore be determined from titrations starting at low pH, at which they will be ionized; acidic samples should be determined from titrations starting at high pH. A comparison between the methods described above is given in Table 2.
CALCULATING PKa RESULTS FROM GRADIENT UV DATA
For a pKa to be measured successfully by this instrument, the UV absorbance of the sample must change as a function of ionization. The pKa values of the samples are calculated from the change in multiwavelength UV absorbance above 250nm as a function of pH. The method is fast because pH is not measured (a slow process), but inferred from the time elapsed from the start of gradient generation. The standard gradient is run between pH2 and pH12 in 120 seconds. Figure 3 compares 112 pKa values measured using this instrument with measured values given in the literature, with an R2 of 0.99. Results for standards and monoprotic samples (i.e. those with only one pKa) with large absorbance changes were calculated by an automated first derivative method (AFD). Results for samples with small absorbance changes or overlapping pKas were calculated by target factor analysis (TFA). Examples of these calculation types are explained below for nitrofurantoin and labetalol.
Figure 4 shows the ionization of nitrofurantoin, an acid for which the ionizable group is close to a chromophore. The disposition of the electrons in the chromophore changes when the molecule ionizes (i.e. gains or loses an H+); as a result, the UV absorbances of the ionized and neutral species are different. As shown in Figure 5, the pKa of nitrofurantoin is easily calculated by differentiating the absorbance with respect to pH, and is equivalent to the position of the peak maxima and minima on the pH scale.

Structure of nitrofurantoin showing ionized and neutral species and identifying the ionizing group.

The graph in 5a shows UV absorbance of nitrofurantoin at 30 wavelengths between 250 and 400 nm. The graph in 5b shows the first derivative (FD) of the absorbance value. The pKa of nitrofurantoin is equivalent to the mean position of the peak maxima and minima on the pH axis.
If the ionizable group is a long way from a chromophore, the change in UV absorbance as a function of pH is likely to be small. Nonetheless, sufficient absorbance change to calculate a pKa can often be observed in multiwavelength UV data. Figure 6 shows the structure of labetalol, which has two ionizable groups. The acidic phenol is attached directly to a benzene ring, which is strong chromophore. However the basic nitrogen is three bond-lengths away from the nearest region of conjugation. It might be expected that the UV absorbance of the basic group will not be affected by ionization. In fact a small absorbance change with ionization occurs, perhaps because the molecule's flexibility allows the nitrogen to approach the benzene ring and thus slightly influence the disposition of electrons in the ring. The 3-D spectrum of labetalol is shown in Figure 7a. It may be deconvoluted by TFA into a graph of molar absorptivity as a function of wavelength (7b), and a graph of % species vs. pH (7c); the pKas correspond to the intercepts on the distribution of species graph. Any absorbance which cannot be allocated to these two graphs is shown in a 3-D graph of residual absorbance (7d). The mathematical basis of TFA for determining pKa values has been described, 4 and is summarized in the caption for Figure 7.

Structure of labetalol showing ionized and neutral species and identifying the ionizing groups.

Illustration of pK determination by target factor analysis (TFA).
Data for a 96-well tray is processed automatically by both AFD and TFA in under 30 minutes. Afterwards, results for individual samples can be inspected and recalculated manually, if required. Reports can be created automatically in HTML or MS Word format.
Conclusion
Finding the right equilibrium between the physicochemical properties and the biological activity of a drug candidate is a difficult, challenging and expensive process. The Sirius ProfilerSGA can play a valuable part in this process. The Sirius ProfilerSGA is the solution for rapid pKa measurement:
measure pKa rapidly
multi-wavelength spectrophotometric technique
open access option
automated data handling and processing
full computer control
micro-plate format
measures below 10–5M concentration
300 assays in 24 hours
Sirius ProfilerSGA uses multi-wavelength UV spectroscopy and a linear 2-12 pH unit gradient for truly rapid pKa determination. Taking samples direct from stock solutions and working on a microtitre tray format, ProfilerSGA automatically prepares the samples by diluting to the required concentration. Each solution is then injected directly into a pH gradient stream, mixed and passed through the quartz flow cell, allowing pKas to be measured rapidly.
