A model of the effects of economic level and ethnicity on grade 8 mathematics scores both within and between schools found that both the economic composition and the ethnic composition of a school were directly related to the effectiveness of that school. Projection of the data suggests that if the nation's schools were completely desegregated economically (but not at all ethnically), the test-score gap between free lunch students and students paying full price for lunch would decline by 25 %. Ethnic compositional effects for black, Asian/Pacific Islander (API), and Hispanic students were reversed from their within-school effects, with positive effects for students in schools with larger proportions of black and Hispanic students and a strong negative effect for students in schools with larger proportions of Asian/Pacific Islander students.
BallonE.Racial differences in high school math track assignment.Journal of Latinos and Education.2008; 7(4): 272–87.
2.
BankstonC.III, CaldasS.J.Majority African American schools and social injustice: the influence of de facto segregation on academic achievement.Social Forces.1996; 75(2): 535–56.
3.
BerryR.Q.III. Voices of African-American male students: a portrait of successful middle school mathematics students. PhD dissertation. Chapel Hill, NC: School of Education, University of North Carolina. 2002.
4.
BertsJ.R., RuebenK.S., DanenbergA. Equal resources, equal outcomes? The distribution of school resources and student achievement in California.San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California; 2000.
5.
BlackoibyJ., SchillerE., MallikS., HebbelerK., HuangT., JavitzH.Patterns in the identification of and outcomes for children and youth with disabilities. NCEE 2010–4005 Congress. 2010.
6.
BogerJ.C., OrfieldG., editors. School resegregation: must the South turn back?Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2005.
7.
BollenK.A., GlanvilleJ., StecklovG.Socioeconomic status and class in studies of fertility and health in developing countries.Annu Rev Sociol.2001; 27: 153–85.
8.
BormanK.M., EitleT.M.N., MichaelD., EitleD.J., LeeR., JohnsonL.Accountability in a Postdesegregation Era: the continuing significance of racial segregation in Florida's schools.Am Educ Res J.2004; 41(3): 605–31.
9.
BourdieuP., PasseronJ-C. Reproduction in education, society, and culture. Translated by R. Nice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1977.
10.
BraswellJ.S., LutkusA.D., GriggW.S., SantapauS.L., Tay-LimBS-H, JohnsonM.S.The nation's report card: mathematics 2000. Vol. NCES 2001–617. Washington: U.S. Department of Education; Office of Educational Research and Improvement; 2001.
11.
BraswellJ.S., DionG.S., DaaneM.C., JinY.The nation's report card: mathematics 2003. Vol. NCES 2005–451. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2005.
12.
BraunH., JenkinsF., GriggW.A closer look at charter schools using hierarchical linear modeling. Vol: NCES 2006–460. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences; 2006.
13.
CardD., RothsteinJ.Racial segregation and the black-white test score gap.Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2006.
14.
CashinS.The failures of integration: how race and class are undermining the American dream.New York: Public Affairs; 2004.
15.
CrainR.I., MahardR.E.Desegregation and black achievement: a review of the research.Law and Contemporary Problems.1978; 23(3): 17–56.
16.
Darling-HammondL.The color line in American education: race, resources, and student achievement.Du Bois Review.2004; 1(2): 213–46.
17.
Darling-HammondL.Securing the right to learn: policy and practice for powerful teaching and learning.Educ Res.2006; 35(7): 13–24.
18.
DelpitL.D.Other people's children.New York: New Press; 1995.
19.
EfronB.Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife.Ann Stat.1979; 7: 1–26.
20.
EversonH.T., MillsapR.E.Beyond individual differences: exploring School effects on sat scores, vol. 3.New York: College Entrance Examination Board; 2004.
21.
FergusonR.F.Paying for public education: new evidence on how and why money matters.Harvard Journal on Legislation.1991; 28: 465–98.
22.
FergusonR.F.Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. In: JencksC., PhillipsM., editors. The Black-White test score gap.Washington: Brookings Institution Press; 1998. p. 318–74.
23.
FlinspachS.L., BanksK.E.Moving beyond race: socioeconomic diversity as a race-neutral approach to desegregation in the Wake County schools. In: BogerJ.C., OrfieldG., editors. School resegregation: must the South turn back?Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2005. p. 261–80.
24.
FordhamS., OgbuJ.U.Black students’ school success: coping with the burden of Acting White'.Urban Rev.1986; 18(3): 176–206.
25.
GoeLaura. 2002. “Legislating Equity: The Distribution of Emergency Permit Teachers in California.”Education Policy Analysis Archives10(42).
26.
GrissmerD., FlanaganA., WilliamsonS.Why did the Black-White score gap narrow in the 1970s and 1980s? In: JencksC., PhillipsM., editors. The Black-White test score gap.Washington: Brookings Institute; 1998. p. 182–226.
27.
GrissmerD., FlanaganA., KawataJ., WilliamsonS.Improving student achievement: what State Naep test scores tell us.Santa Monica: RAND; 2000.
28.
HanushekE., KainJ., RivkinS.New evidence about ‘Brown V. Board of Education’: the complex effects of school racial composition on achievement.J Labor Econ.2009.
29.
HarrisL.Report on the status of public school education in California 2004.Los Angeles: UCLA Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access; 2004.
30.
HarrisM.M., WillomerD.J.Principal's optimism and perceived school effectiveness.J Educ Adm.1998; 36: 353–61.
31.
HilliardA.G.III. Race, identity, hegemony, and education: what do we need to know now? In: WatkinsW.H., LewisJ.H., ChouV., editors. Race and education: the roles of history and society in educating African American students.Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001. p. 7–25.
KozolJ.Savage inequalities: children in America's schools.New York: Crown; 1991.
34.
KozolJ.The shame of the nation: the restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America.New York: Crown Publishers; 2005.
35.
LeeJ.Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: reversing the progress toward equity?Educ Res.2002; 31(1): 3–12.
36.
LeeV.E., BrykA.S.A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement.Sociol Educ.1989; 62: 172–92.
37.
LittleR.F.A., RubinD.B.Statistical analysis with missing data.Hoboken: Wiley – Interscience; 2002.
38.
LubienskiC., LubienskiS.T.Charter, private, public schools and academic achievement: new evidence from Naep mathematics data.New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education; 2006.
39.
LubienskiS.T., ShelleyM.C.II. A closer look at U.S. mathematics instruction and achievement: examinations of race and ses in a decade of Naep data. In: American Educational Research Association.Chicago: EDRS; 2003. p. 50.
40.
MalloyC., MalloyW.Issues of culture in mathematics teaching and learning.Urban Rev.1998; 30: 245–57.
41.
MarshH.W., LüdtkeO., RobitzschA., TrautweinU., AsparouhovT., MuthénB.Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error.Multivar Behav Res.2009; 44: 764–802.
42.
MartinD.B. In: SchoenfeldA.H., editor. Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: the roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency.Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
43.
McMillianM.M., FullerS., HillZ., DuchK., DarityW.Racial composition and student achievement under wake county's race- and income-based school assignment policies. 2014.
44.
MickelsonR.A., BottiaM.Integrated education and mathematics outcomes: a synthesis of social science research.North Carolina Law Review.2010; 88: 993–1090.
45.
MickelsonR.A., BottiaM.C., LambertR.Effects of school racial composition on K-12 mathematics outcomes: a metaregression analysis.Rev Educ Res.2013; 83(1): 121–58.
46.
MislevyR.F., BeatonA.E., KaplanB., SheehanK.M.Estimating population characteristics from sparse matrix samples of item responses.J Educ Meas.1992; 29(2): 133–61.
47.
MuthénLinda K., and BengtO. Muthén. 1998–2005. Mplus User's Guide.Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.
National Center for Education Statistics.Naep Overview.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics; 2008. Retrieved May 8, 2008, 2008 (http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/).
51.
OakesJ., RogersJ., SilverD., GoodeJ.Separate and unequal 50 years after Brown: California's racial ‘Opportunity Gap’.Los Angeles: UCLA/IDEA; 2004.
52.
OlsonL.New bills would prod states to take national view on standards.Educ Week.2007. p. 4.
53.
OrfieldG.The growth of segregation: African Americans, Latinos, and unequal education. In: HillH., JamesJ., JonesE., editors. Dismantling desegregation: the quiet reversal of Brown V. board of education.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1996. p. 234–62.
54.
OrfieldG., DeBrayE.H., editors. Hard work for good schools: facts not fads in Title I Reform.Cambridge: The Civil Rights Project; 1999.
55.
OrfieldG., YunJ.T.Resegregation in American schools.Cambridge: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University; 1999.
56.
OrfieldG.Schools more separate.Rethinking schools online.2001; 16(1): 10.
57.
RaudenbushS.W., BrykA.Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods.Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
58.
ReardonS.F., YunJ.T., KurlaenderM.Implications of income-based school assignment policies for racial school segregation.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.2006; 28(1): 49–75.
59.
ReardonS.F., GrewalE.T., KalogridesD., GreenbergE.Brown fades: the end of court-ordered school desegregation and the resegregation of American public schools.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.2012; 31(4): 876–904. doi: 10.1002/pam.21649.
60.
ReganR.The relationship between school socioeconomic composition and academic performance: a comparative analysis of elementary schools in the five largest North Carolina school districts 2002–2003. In: Annual Meeting of the North Carolina Association for Research in Education.Chapel Hill, NC: not published; 2005.
61.
RistR.C.Student social class and teacher expectations: the self-fulfilling prophecy in Ghetto education.Harv Educ Rev.1970; 40(3): 411–51.
62.
RogersA.M., StoeckelJ.J.Naep 2003 mathematics and reading assessments secondary-use data files data companion.Washington: National Center for Education Statistics; 2004.
63.
RogoffB.The cultural nature of human development.New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
64.
RothsteinR.Class and schools: using social, economic, and educational reform to close the Black-White achievement gap.Washington: Economic Policy Institute; 2004.
65.
RumbergerR.W., PalardyG.J.Does resegregation matter? In: BogerJ.C., OrfieldG., editors. School resegregation: must the South turn back?Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2005. p. 127–47.
66.
SchellenbergS.J.Concentration of poverty and the ongoing need for Title I. In: OrfieldG., DeBrayE.H., editors. Hard work for good schools: facts not fads in Title I Reform.Cambridge: The Civil Rights Project; 1999. p. 130–46.
67.
SharmaA., JoynerA.M., OsmentA.Adverse Impact of racial isolation on student performance: a study in North Carolina.Education Policy Analysis Archives.2014; 22(14).
68.
SirinS.R.Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research.Rev Educ Res.2005; 75(3): 417–53.
69.
SnijdersT., BoskerR.Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.Trowbridge: The Cromwell Press, Ltd.; 2000.
70.
SpringJ.Deculturalization and the struggle for equality.New York: McGraw Hill; 2004.
71.
StancavageF.B., MitchellJ.H., de MelloV.P., GaertnerF.E., SpainA.K., RahalL.National Indian education study, part Ii: The educational experiences of fourth- and eighth-grade American Indian and Alaskan Native Students, vol. 2007–454. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics; 2006.
72.
StreetP.Segregated schools: educational apartheid in post-civil rights America.New York: Routledge; 2005.
73.
StroubK.J., RichardsM.P.From resegregation to reintegration: trends in the Racial/Ethnic Segregation of Metropolitan Public Schools.Am Educ Res J.2013; 50(3): 497–531.
74.
StrutchensM.E., STLubienskiR.M.G., WestbrookS.K.Naep findings regarding race and ethnicity: students’ performance, school experiences, attitudes and beliefs, and family influences. In: KloostermanP., FrankJ., LesterK., editors. Results and interpretations of the 1990–2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress.Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2004. p. 269–304.
75.
SullivanA.L., BalA.Disproportionality in special education: effects of Individual and school variables on disability risk.Except Child.2013; 79(4): 475–94.
76.
TeranishiR., AllenW.R., SolórzanoD.G.Opportunity at the crossroads: racial inequality, school segregation, and higher education in California.Teach Coll Rec.2004; 106(11): 2224–45.
77.
WalsemanK.M., BellB., GoosbyB.Effect of school racial composition on trajectories of depressive symptoms from adolescence through early adulthood.Race and Social Problems.2011; 3(3): 131–45.
78.
WhiteK.R.The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.Psychol Bull.1982; 91: 461–81.
79.
WillisP.Elements of a culture. In: Learning to labor: how working class kids get working class jobs.New York: Columbia University Press; 1981.
80.
WillmsJ.D.Social class segregation and its relationship to Pupils’ examination results in Scotland.Am Sociol Rev.1986; 51: 224–41.
81.
WillmsJ.D.Learning divides: ten policy questions about the performance and equity of schools and schooling systems, vol. UIS/WP/06-02. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2006.
