According to research, stakeholder disappointment is a root problem within projects. In this article, the dilemmas related to stakeholder inclusiveness, in other words, engaging a broad range of stakeholders, are discussed. Based on a longitudinal case study, three propositions are offered: Applying stakeholder inclusiveness in a project (1) increases the likelihood of more engaged and satisfied stakeholders; (2) increases the danger of losing focus on those stakeholders who possess the most critical resources for the project's survival and progress; and (3) increases the danger of inducing stakeholder disappointment due to expectation escalation and impossibility of embracing conflicting requirements and wishes.
AaltonenK. (2010). Stakeholder management in international projects (Doctoral dissertation series 2010/13, Aalto University, School of Science and Technology, Helsinki, Finland).
2.
AarsethW., RolstadåsA., & AndersenB. (2011). Key factors for management of global projects: A case study. International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 1, 326–345.
3.
AbramsF. (1951). Management responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review, 29(5), 29–34.
4.
AckermannF., & EdenC. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Planning, 44(3), 179–196.
5.
AckoffR. (1974). Redesigning the future.New York, NY: Wiley.
AnsoffI. (1965). Corporate strategy.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
8.
ArnsteinS.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
9.
BarnardC.I. (1938/1974). The functions of the executive (30th anniversary ed., 1974). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BeringerC., JonasD., & GemündenH.G. (2012). Establishing project portfolio management: An exploratory analysis of the influence of internal stakeholders’ interactions. Project Management Journal, 43(6), 16–32.
11.
BourneL., & WalkerD. H. T. (2008). Project relationship management and the Stakeholder Circle™. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(1), 125–130.
12.
ButterfieldL. D., BorgenW. A., AmundsonN. E., & MaglioA.-S.T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954–2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475–497.
13.
ClelandD.I. (1985). A strategy for ongoing project evaluation. Project Management Journal, 16(3), 11–17.
14.
CyertR., & MarchJ. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
DeetzS. (1995). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
17.
DerryR. (2012). Reclaiming marginalized stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 253–264.
18.
DillonS., & TaylorH. (2015). Employing grounded theory to uncover behavioral competencies of information technology project managers. Project Management Journal, 46(4), 90–104.
19.
DonaldsonT., & PrestonL.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), B5–B91.
20.
EskerodP., & HuemannM. (2013). Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: What standards say. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 36–50.
21.
EskerodP., & HuemannM. (2014). Managing for stakeholders. In TurnerJ. R. (Ed.), Gower handbook of project management (5th ed., pp. 217–232). Aldershot, England: Gower.
EskerodP., & VaagaasarA.L. (2014). Stakeholder management strategies and practices during a project course. Project Management Journal, 45(5), 71–85.
24.
FlanaganJ.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
25.
FreemanR.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach.Boston, MA: Pitman/Ballinger.
26.
FreemanR. E., HarrisonJ. S., & WicksA.C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
FreemanR. E., HarrisonJ. S., WicksA. C., ParmarB. L., & De ColleS. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
FroomanJ. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
30.
GreenwoodM. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.
31.
HahnT., FiggeF., PinkseJ., & PreussL. (2010). Editorial trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can't have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 217–229.
32.
HelinS., JensenT., & SandströmJ. (2013). “Like a battalion of tanks:” A critical analysis of stakeholder management. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(3), 209–218.
HuemannM., & ZuchiD. (2014). Toward a comprehensive project stakeholder management approach for HR projects. In KlimoskiR., DuganB., MessikomerC., & ChiocchioF. (Eds.), Advancing human resource project management (pp. 383–424). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
JepsenA. L., & EskerodP. (2009). Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 335–343.
36.
Johnson-CramerM., & BermanS. (2005). A dynamic model of stakeholder management. In LogsdonJ., & RyanL. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the International Association for Business and Society (pp. 215–220), Sonoma Valley, CA, USA.
37.
Johnson-CramerM., BermanS., & PostJ. (2003). Reexamining the concept of stakeholder management. In AndriofJ., WaddockS., RahmanS., & HustedB. (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (Vol. 2, pp. 145–161). London, England: Greenleaf.
38.
JulianS. D., Ofori-DankwaJ. C., & JustisR.T. (2008). Understanding strategic responses to interest group pressures. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 963–984.
KillenC. P., JugdevK., DrouinN., & PetitY. (2012). Advancing project and portfolio management research: Applying strategic management theories. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 525–538.
41.
LittauP., JujagiriN. J., & AdlbrechtG. (2010). 25 years of stakeholder theory in project management literature (1984–2009). Project Management Journal, 41(4), 17–29.
42.
LochC., & KavadiasS. (2011). Implementing strategy through projects. In MorrisP. W. G., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 224–251). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
43.
LundinR. A., & SöderholmA. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 437–455.
MilesS. (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused?Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 285–298.
46.
MitchellR. K., AgleB. R., & WoodD.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
47.
MorrisP. W. G. (2011). A brief history of project management. In MorrisP. W. G., PintoJ. K., & SöderlundJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of project management (pp. 15–36). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
48.
MorrisP. W. G., & HoughG. (1987). The anatomy of major projects: A study of the reality of project management.Chichester, England: Wiley.
49.
NevilleB. A., & MengucB. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 377–391.
50.
NolandJ., & PhillipsR. (2010). Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 39–49.
51.
PfefferJ., & SalancikG.R. (1978). The external control of organizations.Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
52.
Project Management Institute (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) –Third edition.Newtown Square, PA: Author.
53.
RhenmanE. (1968). Industrial democracy and industrial management.London, England: Tavistock.
RowleyT.I. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
56.
RowleyT., & MoldoveanuM. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.
57.
SavageG. T., NixT. W., WhitheadC. J., & BlairJ.D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executives, 5(2), 61–75.
58.
SiggelkowN. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.
59.
SilviusA. J. G., & SchipperR. P. J. (2014). Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis. Social Business, 4(1), 63–96.
60.
Solli-SætherH., KarlsenJ. T., & van OorschotK. (2015). Strategic and cultural misalignment: Knowledge sharing barriers in project networks. Project Management Journal, 46(3), 49–60.
61.
WheelerD., & SillanpääM. (1998). Including the stakeholders: The business case. Long Range Planning, 32(2), 201–210.
62.
WhittingtonR. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–634.
63.
YangR., WangY., & JinX.-H. (2014). Stakeholders’ attributes, behaviours, and decision strategies in construction projects: Importance and correlations in practice. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 74–90.
