The current research study utilized a case study research method to test the theory that the creativity and innovative processes are a complex adaptive system. Through qualitative interviews with renowned creators, the current study categorized the data into eight characteristics of complex adaptive systems: path dependent, systems have a history, non–linearity, emergence, irreducible, adaptive, order and chaos, and self–organizing. This study advances the literature by being the first to identify and test the creativity and innovative processes as a complex adaptive system. The current study also extends the theoretical model for creativity and innovation by providing support for each of the eight characteristics of a complex adaptive system. The supported model provides a new perspective on creativity and innovation that could benefit organizational research and how these processes are managed.
AagaardP. (2012). The challenge of adaptive capability in public organizations: A case study of complexity in crime prevention. Public Management Review, 14, 731–746. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.642626
2.
AmabileT. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40, 39–58. Retrieved from http://cmr.berkeley.edu/
3.
AmabileT. M., & PrattM. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
4.
AndersonA. R., DoddS. D., & JackS. L. (2012). Entrepreneurship as connecting: some implications for theorising and practice. Management Decision, 50(5), 958–971. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227708
5.
AndersonN., PotocnikK., & ZhouJ. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state–of–the–science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128
6.
AntonacopoulouE., & ChivaR. (2007). The social complexity of organizational learning: The dynamics of learning and organizing. Management Learning, 38(3), 277–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607079029
7.
BaileyC. A. (2018). A guide to qualitative field research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
BerghD. D. (2003). Thinking strategically about contribution [Editorial]. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 135–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2003.17481820
9.
BledowR., FreseM., AndersonN. R., ErexM., & FarrJ. L. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754–9434.2009.01154.x
10.
BoalK. B., & SchultzP. L. (2007). Storytelling, time, and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 411–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.008
11.
BorzilloS., & Kaminska–LabbeR. (2011). Unravelling the dynamics of knowledge creation in communities of practice though complexity theory lenses. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(4), 353–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2011.13
12.
BotticchioM., & VialleW. J. (2009). Creativity and flow theory: Reflections on the talent development of women. In J. Shi (Ed.), International conference on the cultivation and education of creativity and innovation (pp. 97–107). Xi'an, China: Institute of Psychology of Chinese Academy of Sciences.
13.
BrymanA. (2008). Social research methods (3rd. ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
ButlerM. J. R., & AllenP. M. (2008). Understanding policy implementation processes as self–organizing systems. Public Management Review, 10(3), 421–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802002923
15.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: The psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
16.
DavisA. P., DentE. B., & WharffD. M. (2015). A Conceptual Model of Systems Thinking Leadership in Community Colleges. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(4), 333–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213–015–9340–9
17.
De MassisA., & KotlarJ. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007
FordC. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112–1142. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071865
20.
FuruP. (2012). Culturally contingent leadership behaviour: An analysis of leadership as characterized by Andrea Camilleri's Inspector Montalbano. Leadership, 8(3), 303–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715012441872
21.
HearnshawE. J. S., & WilsonM. M. J. (2013). A complex network approach to supply chain network theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(3–4), 442–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571311307343
22.
HuntJ. G., OsbornR. N., & BoalK. B. (2009). The architecture of managerial leadership: Stimulation and channeling of organizational emergence. Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 503–516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.010
23.
HunterS. T., & CushenberyL. (2011). Leading for innovation: Direct and indirect influences. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(3), 248–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422311424263
24.
JaccardJ., & JacobyJ. (2010). Theory construction and model–building skills. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
LarsonC. S. (2016). Evidence of shared aspects of complexity science and quantum phenomena. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 12(2), 160–171. Retrieved from www.cosmosandhistory.org
27.
LauserB. (2010). Post–merger integration and change processes from a complexity perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 5(1), 6–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261011016531
28.
LindbergC., & SchneiderM. (2013). Combating infections at Maine Medical Center: Insights into complexity–informed leadership from positive deviance. Leadership, 9(2), 229–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715012468784
29.
LoewenbergerP. (2013). The role of HRD in stimulating, supporting, and sustaining creativity and innovation. Human Resource Development Review, 12(4), 422–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484313494088
30.
LuomaM. (2006). A play of four arenas: How complexity can serve management development. Management Learning, 37(1), 101–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606058136
31.
MowlesC. (2014). Complex, but not quite complex enough: The turn to the complexity sciences in evaluation scholarship. Evaluation, 20(2), 160–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014527885
32.
NairA., NarasimhanR., & ChoiT. Y. (2009). Supply networks as a complex adaptive system: Toward simulation based theory building on evolutionary decision making. Decision Sciences, 40(4), 783–815. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540–5915.2009.00251
33.
PopperK. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
PurchaseS., OlaruD., & DenizeS. (2014). Innovation network trajectories and changes in resource bundles. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 448–459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.013
35.
ReichenbachH. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
StawB. M. (1990). An evolutionary approach to creativity and innovation. In WestM. A. & FarrJ. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 287–308). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
SwedbergR. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery. Theory & Society, 41(1), 1–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186–011–9161–5
39.
TsangE. W. K. (2014). Generalizing from research findings: The merits of case studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 369–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12024
40.
TurnerJ. R., & BakerR. (2019). Complexity theory: An overview with potential applications for the social sciences. Systems, 7(4), 23. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010004
41.
TurnerJ. R., BakerR., & KellnerF. (2018). Theoretical literature review: Tracing the life cycle of a theory and its verified and falsified statements. Human Resource Development Review, 17(4), 34–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484317749680
42.
Van de VenA. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
VissakT. (2010). Recommendations for using the case study method in international business research. The Qualitative Report, 15(2), 370–388. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol15/iss2/8
44.
WaddockS., MeszoelyG. M., WaddellS., & DentoniD. (2015). The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(6), 993–1012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm–08–2014–0146
45.
WaightC. L. (2005). Exploring connections between human resource development and creativity. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 151–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422305274524
46.
WaldropM. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
47.
WestM. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3), 355–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1464–0597.00951
48.
WestM. A., & FarrJ. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behavior: An International Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 15–30.
WoodmanR. W., SawyerJ. E., & GriffinR. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517
51.
YinR. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
ZhouJ. (2006). A model of paternalistic organizational control and group creativity. In ChenY.–R. (Ed.), National culture and groups: Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 9, pp. 75–94). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
