Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The notion of localism and decentralization in national policy has come increasingly to the fore in recent years. The national succession planning strategy for headteachers in England introduced by the National College for School Leadership promoted ‘local solutions for a national challenge’. This article deals with some aspects of the tensions inherent in seeking to achieve large-scale policy goals by taking a localizing approach. The concepts of complex adaptive systems are used as a framework within which to analyse and interpret the design and impact of the strategy. An insight offered is that responses to any strategy or initiative are always local. Some propositions are made about the circumstances in which desired results might be expected to emerge, the distinctive behaviours that may be required of leaders and some reflections on the nature of the succession planning challenge.

Keywords

complex adaptive systems complexity leadership local solutions schools succession planning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berry

BJL

Kiel

Elliott

(2002) Adaptive agents, intelligence, and emergent human organization: capturing complexity through agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(Suppl 3): 7187.

Bolton

(2010) Academies: Statistics. London: House of Commons Library.

Bonabeau

(2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(90003), 7280–7287.

Bush

(2011a) Succession planning in England: new leaders and new forms of leadership. School Leadership and Management 31(3): 181–198.

Bush

(2011b) Succession planning and leadership development: comparing Engish and South African approaches. Compare 41(6): 785–800.

Chapman

(2004) System Failure, 2nd edn. London: Demos.

Daly

Moolenaar

Carrier

(2010) Reform at the edge of chaos: connecting complexity, social networks, and policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.

Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2008) Communities in control: real people, real power. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/communitiesincontrol (accessed 29 March 2011).

Department for Communities and Local Government (2010) The Localism Bill. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/decentralization/localismbill/ (accessed 29 March 2011).

10.

Department for Education (DfE) (2010) The Importance of Teaching. London: TSO.

11.

Earley

. (2002) Establishing the Current State of School Leadership in England. London: DfES.

12.

Eppel

Matheson

Walton

, (2011)Principles for Practice.

13.

Epstein

(2006) Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

14.

Epstein

Axtell

and Project 2050 (1996) Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science From the Bottom Up. Brookings Institution Press.

15.

Fullan

(2005) Leadership & Sustainability: System Thinkers in Action. London: Corwin.

16.

Gillie

(2010) Academies: An Overview. London: House of Commons Library.

17.

Goldspink

(2010) Rethinking education reform: a loosely coupled and complex systems perspective. Education Management Administration & Leadership 35: 27.

18.

Hargreaves

(2003) Education Epidemic: Transforming Secondary Schools Through Innovation Networks. Demos.

19.

Hargreaves

(2010) Creating a Self-Improving School System. Nottingham: National College.

20.

Hargreaves

Fink

(2003) Sustaining leadership. Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management 435.

21.

Hargreaves

Fink

(2005) Sustainable leadership. The Essentials of School Leadership 173–189.

22.

Hayden

Benington

(2000) Multi-level networked governance; reflections from the better government for older people programme. Public Money and Management 20(2): 27–34.

23.

Heifetz

Linsky

(2002) Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive Through the Dangers of Leading. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

24.

Hill et al (2012) The Growth of Academy Chains: Implications for Leaders. Nottingham: National College.

25.

Howson

(2011) 26th Annual Survey of senior staff appointments in schools across England and Wales. Education Data Surveys/ TSL Education.

26.

Jones

Hesterly

Borgatti

(1997) A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review 22(4): 911–945.

27.

Lemke

Sabelli

(2008) Complex systems and educational change: towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40(1): 118–129.

28.

Mason

(2008) What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change? Educational Philosophy and Theory 40(1): 35–49.

29.

McQuillan

(2008) Small-school reform through the lens of complexity theory: it’s ‘good to think with’. The Teachers College Record 110(9): 1772–1801.

30.

Mingers

Rosenhead

(2004) Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research 152(3): 530–554.

31.

Morrison

(2010) Complexity theory, school leadership and management: questions for theory and practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 38(3).

32.

National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services (2006) Succession Planning Advice to Secretary of State. Nottingham: National College.

33.

National College (2007a) Framework for Action. Nottingham: National College.

34.

National College (2007b) Remit Letter. Nottingham: National College.

35.

National College (2008) Annual Report. Nottingham: National College.

36.

National College (2009a) Headship Index 2009. Nottingham: National College.

37.

National College (2009b) Guidance for chairs of governors. Available at: http://www.nationalcollege.org.uk/index/leadershiplibrary/leadingschools/successionplanning/headship-schools-religious-character/succession-planning-dioceses/materials-to-use-with-governors.htm (accessed 3 April 2011).

38.

National College (2010) Corporate plan 2009/10. Available at: http://www.nationalcollege.org.uk/docinfo?id=24196&filename=corporate-plan-2009–10.pdf (accessed 3 April 2011).

39.

Pont et al (2008) Improving School Leadership Volume 1: Policy and Practice. Paris: OECD.

40.

Reynolds

(1987) Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 25–34.

41.

Rittel

HWJ

Webber

(1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2): 155–169.

42.

Stacey

(1996) Complexity and Creativity in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

43.

Stacey

(2007) Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics, 5th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.

44.

Stoker

(2006) Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration 36(1).

45.

Toh

H-J

(2011) ICT reform initiatives in Singapore schools: a complexity theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review 12(3): 349–357.

46.

Wallace

(2004) Orchestrating complex educational change: local reorganization of schools in England. Journal of Educational Change 5(1): 57–78.

47.

Wallace

Fertig

Schneller

(2007) Managing Change in the Public Services. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Local Solutions for National Challenges? Exploring Local Solutions Through the Case of a National Succession Planning Strategy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References