Social media applications such as Facebook and Twitter have become integrated into sociocultural practices for millions of people around the world, and are having an enduring impact on the field of adult education. As essentially free, virtually non–hierarchical tools that facilitate user–generated knowledge, these online spaces may be powerful applications for a talking – or “typing” – back to dominant ideology, and giving voice to counter discourses. These tools require careful consideration around issues such as technological know–how, access, and consumerism which is inherent in these applications. This paper discusses social media as Web 2.0 tools, their connection to critical discourse and adult education, and the considerations of using these tools in an educational context.
boydD. (2007). The significance of social software. In BurgT.N. & SchmidtJ. (Eds.), Blog talks reloaded: Social software research and cases (pp. 15–30). Norderstedt, Germany: Books on Demand.
2.
BrighamS. (2013). Theorizing race in adult education: Critical race theory. In BrighamT. S., TaberN., & GibbsT. (Eds.), Building on critical traditions: Adult education and learning in Canada (119–128). Toronto, ON: Thompson
3.
BrookfieldS. (2005). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass
BurgessJ. (2006). Hearing ordinary voices: Cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling. Journal of Media and Culture, 20(2), 201–214.
6.
CarpenterS. & MojabS. (2013). What is “critical” about critical adult education? In NesbitT., BrighamS., TaberN., & GibbT. (Eds.), Building on critical traditions: Adult education and learning in Canada (pp. 160–170). Toronto, ON: Thompson.
7.
ChovanecD. & MeckelborgM. (2011). Social networking sites and adult literacy leaning. AlphaPlus research paper. Retrieved from: www.alphaplus.ca
8.
ElgortI., SmithA. & TolandJ. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group course work?Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 195–210.
9.
EllisonN. & boydD. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In DuttonW.H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 151–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
FreedmanD. (2002). A ‘technological idiot’? Raymond Williams and communications technology. Information Communication and Society, 5(3), 425–442.
11.
FriesenN. & LoweS. (2012). The questionable promise of social media for education: Connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 183–194.
12.
GirouxH. (2000). Public pedagogy as cultural politics: Stuart Hall and the ‘crisis’ of culture. Cultural Studies, 14(2), 341–360.
13.
GouthroP. (2002). Education for sale: At what cost? Lifelong learning and the marketplace. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(4), 334–346.
14.
GouthroP. (2006). Reason, Communicative learning and civil society: The use of Habermasia theory in adult education. The Journal of Educational Thought, 40(1), 5–22.
15.
GreenhowC., RobeliaB., & HughesJ. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in the digital age. Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now?Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246–259.
16.
GriffithA. & SmithD. (2005). Mothering for schooling. New York: Routledge Falmer.
17.
hooksB. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. Cambridge, MA: South End.
18.
JanksH. (2012). The importance of critical literacy. English teaching: Practice and critique, 11(1), 150–163.
19.
KaplanA. & HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.
20.
KellnerD. & KimG. (2009). YouTube, critical pedagogy, and media activism: An articulation. 241–251. In HammerR. & KellnerD. (Eds.) Media/cultural studies: Critical approaches(pp. 615–636). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
21.
KietzmannJ., HermkensK., McCarthyI. & SilvestreB. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54, 241–251
22.
KincheloeJ. & McLarenP. (2008). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In DenzinN. & LincolnY. (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (3rd Ed). (pp. 403–455). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
LukeA. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory into Practice, 51(4), 4–11.
25.
MarcuseH. (1964). One–dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press.
26.
McLoughlinC., & LeeM. J. (2007, December). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 664–675).
27.
MoranM., SeamanJ., & Tinti–KaneH. (2011). Teaching, learning, and sharing: How today's higher education faculty use social media. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from: http://www.eric.ed.gov.www.msvu.ca:2048/PDFS/ED535130.pdf
28.
OlssenM. & PetersM. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
SipiorJ.WardB., & ConnollyR. (2010). The digital divide and t–government in the United States: Using the technology acceptance model to understand usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 308–328.
