Historical and legislative evolutions of education policy have repurposed federally funded adult education programs in the United States. The 2014 passage of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) has considerable repercussions for everyone involved in the field because it controls the funding, assessment, and structure of these programs. Using critical discourse analysis, this study examines the public law and a Program Memorandum from the federal government. It demonstrates how the language used in the documents characterizes Title II of WIOA (the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act), the goals of adult education, eligible adult learners, and the process by which programs are held accountable for federal funding. The findings show the ways in which Title II tactically legitimizes the U.S. government’s neoliberal capitalist desire within a democratic society: The idealistic language of opportunity acts as a camouflage for the further infiltration of market-oriented practices into the public sector.
Adult Education Act of 1966, Pub. L. 89-750, 80 Stat. 1191.
2.
AlampreseJ. A. (2004). Understanding adult education in the context of family literacy. In WasikB. H. (Ed.), Handbook of family literacy (pp. 253-269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AnderssonP.FejesA. (2005). Recognition of prior learning as a technique for fabricating the adult learner: A genealogical analysis on Swedish adult education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 595-613.
4.
ApplebyY.BathmakerA. (2006). The new skills agenda: Increased lifelong learning or new sites of inequality?British Educational Research Journal, 32, 703-717.
5.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
6.
BallS. J. (2004). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy. In BallS. J. (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in sociology of education (pp. 143-155). London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
7.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. New Delhi, India: Sage.
8.
BeckerG. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BederH. (1999). The outcomes and impacts of adult literacy education in the United States. Boston, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
10.
BellD. A.Jr. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93, 518-533.
11.
BelzerA. (2017). Focusing or narrowing: Trade-offs in the development of adult basic education, 1991-2015. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 155, 11-18.
12.
BernsteinK. A.HellmichE. A.KatznelsonN.ShinJ.VinallK. (2015). Introduction to special issue: Critical perspectives on neoliberalism in second/foreign language education. L2 Journal, 7(3), 3-14.
13.
BlommaertJ. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
CabalinC. (2012). Neoliberal education and student movements in Chile: Inequalities and malaise. Policy Futures in Education, 10, 219-228.
16.
CruikshankJ. (1993). The role of advocacy: A critical issue in Canadian university extension work. Studies in the Education of Adults, 25, 172-183.
17.
Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, Pub. L. 88-452, 78 Stat. 508.
FaircloughN. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121-138). London, England: Sage.
20.
FaircloughN. (2004). Semiotic aspects of social transformation and learning. In RebeccaR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 225-236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
FeinsteinL.HammondC. (2004). The contribution of adult learning to health and social capital. Oxford Review of Education, 30, 199-221.
22.
GibbT. L. (2008). Bridging Canadian adult second language education and essential skills policies: Approach with caution. Adult Education Quarterly, 58, 318-334.
23.
GordonL.WhittyG. (1997). Giving the “hidden hand” a helping hand? The rhetoric and reality of neoliberal education reform in England and New Zealand. Comparative Education, 33, 453-467.
24.
GraceA. P. (2012). The decline of social education and the rise of instrumentalism in North American adult education (1947-1970). Studies in the Education of Adults, 44, 225-244.
25.
GrummellB. (2007). The “second chance” myth: Equality of opportunity in Irish adult education policies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 182-201.
26.
HakeB. J. (2006). Late modernity and learning society: Problematic articulations between social arenas, organisations and individuals. In CastroR. V.SanchoA. V.GuimarãesP. (Eds.), Adult education: New routes in a new landscape (pp. 31-56). Braga, Portugal: Unit for Adult Education of the University of Minho.
27.
HallB. (1996). Adult education and the political economy of global economic change. In WangoolaP.YoungmanF. (Eds.), Towards a transformative political economy of adult education: Theoretical and practical challenges (pp. 105-126). DeKalb, IL: LEPS Press.
28.
HallidayM. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
29.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
30.
HarveyD. (2007). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 21-44.
31.
HolborowM. (2012). Neoliberalism, human capital and the skills agenda in higher education: The Irish case. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 10, 93-111.
32.
HopkinsJ. L.MonaghanC. H.HansmanC. A. (2009). Conflict and collaboration: Providers and planners implementing the Workforce Investment Act (WIA). Adult Education Quarterly, 59, 208-226.
33.
HughesC.TightM. (1995). The myth of the learning society. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43, 290-304.
34.
JacobsonE. (2016). Workforce development rhetoric and the realities of 21st century capitalism. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 24(1), 3-22.
35.
JacobsonE. (2017). The workforce investment and opportunity act: New policy developments and persistent issues. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 155, 19-27.
36.
KatznelsonN.BernsteinK. A. (2017). Rebranding bilingualism: The shifting discourses of language education policy in California’s 2016 election. Linguistics and Education, 40, 11-26.
37.
KopeckýM. (2011). Foucault, governmentality, neoliberalism and adult education: Perspective on the normalization of social risks. Journal of Pedagogy/Pedagogický Časopis, 2, 246-262.
38.
KubotaR. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22, 248-260.
39.
LarrottaC. (2017). Immigrants to the United States and adult education services. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 155, 61-69.
40.
LemkeJ. L. (1995). Intertextuality and text semantics. In FriesP. H.GregoryM. (Eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives: Meaning and choice in language (pp. 85-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41.
Lo BiancoJ. (2009). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) and language planning (LP): Constraints and applications of the critical in language planning. In LeT.LeQ.ShortM. (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 101-118). New York, NY: Nova Science.
42.
LynchJ. (2009). Print literacy engagement of parents from low-income backgrounds: Implications for adult and family literacy programs. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 509-521.
43.
Manpower Development and Training Act of 1962, Pub. L. 87-415, 76 Stat. 23.
44.
McLeanS. (2015). Individual autonomy or social engagement? Adult learners in neoliberal times. Adult Education Quarterly, 65, 196-214.
45.
MilanaM.McBainL. (2014). Adult education in the United States of America: A critical examination of national policy (1998-2014). Encyclopaideia: Journal of Phenomenology and Education, 18(40), 34-52.
46.
MojabS. (2006). Adult education without borders. In FenwickT.NesbitT.SpencerB. (Eds.), Contexts of adult education: Canadian perspectives (pp. 347-356). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Thompson Educational.
47.
MulderrigJ. (2003). Consuming education: A critical discourse analysis of social actors in New Labour’s education policy. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1, 96-123.
48.
National Literacy Act of 1991, Pub. L. 102-73, 105 Stat. 333.
49.
OgawaA. (2013). Risk management by a neoliberal state: Construction of new knowledge through lifelong learning in Japan. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34, 132-144.
50.
OlmosL.Van HeertumR.TorresC. A. (Eds.). (2010). In the shadows of neoliberal globalization: Educational reform in the last 25 years in comparative perspective. Oak Park, IL: Bentham Books.
51.
PickardA. (2016). WIOA: Implications for low-scoring adult learners. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 5(2), 50-55.
52.
PrinsE. (2017). Digital storytelling in adult education and family literacy: A case study from rural Ireland. Learning, Media and Technology, 42, 308-323.
53.
RogersR. (2004). Critical approaches to discourse analysis in educational research. In RogersR. (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (pp. 1-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
SelmanG.CookeM.SelmanM.DampierP. (1998). The foundations of adult education in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Thompson Educational.
55.
SparksB. (2001). The gendered construction of the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 91, 47-54.
St. ClairR. (2015). House of cards: Analyzing “making skills everyone’s business.”Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 4(2), 37-42.
58.
StubbsM. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
59.
SumnerJ. (2008). Governance, globalization, and political economy: Perspectives from Canadian adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 59, 22-41.
60.
SunY. (2010). Standards, equity, and advocacy: Employment conditions of ESOL teachers in adult basic education and literacy systems. TESOL Journal, 1, 142-158.
61.
TorresC. A. (2013). Neoliberalism as a new historical bloc: A Gramscian analysis of neoliberalism’s common sense in education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 23, 80-106.
62.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education. (2015). Vision for the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act in the workforce system and initial implementation of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (Program Memorandum OCTAE/DAEL 15-4). Washington, DC: Author.
63.
Van DijkT. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249-283.
64.
VincentC. (1993). Education for the community?British Journal of Educational Studies, 41, 366-380.
65.
WeltonM. (1997). In defense of civil society: Canadian adult education in neo-conservative times. In WaltersS. (Ed.), Globalization, adult education and training: Impacts and issues (pp. 27-38). New York, NY: Zed Books.
66.
WodakR. (2001). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1-13). London, England: Sage.
67.
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014, Pub. L. 113-128, 128 Stat. 1425.
68.
Workforce Investment Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-220, 112 Stat. 936.
