This article explores ways in which race pedagogy interrogates social media as a significant influence on racism and source for race understandings. Social media serves as a context in which to learn about, challenge, and address issues of race. We discuss how social media may be used to promote racial literacy and question and resist racism, using a YouTube post example, comment stream, and video responses. Our focus includes a discussion of intersectionality and highlights ways in which resisting racism may still involve sexism or other oppression.
BurgessJ.GreenJ. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
3.
ByrneD. N. (2007). The future of (the) “race”: Identity, discourse, and the rise of computer-mediated public spheres. In EverettA. (Ed.), Learning race and ethnicity: Youth and digital media (pp. 15-38). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4.
ClarkD. A.SpaniermanL. B.ReedT. D.SobleJ. R.CabanaS. (2011). Documenting weblog expressions of racial microaggressions that target American Indians. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4, 39-50.
5.
CrenshawK. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
6.
DanielsJ. (2007). Race, civil rights and hate speech in the digital era. In EverettA. (Ed.), Learning race and ethnicity: Youth and digital media (pp. 129-154). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7.
DanielsJ. (2013). Race and racism in Internet studies: A review and critique. New Media & Society, 15, 695-719.
GuinierL. (2004). From racial liberalism to racial literacy: Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-divergence/dilemma. The Journal of American History, 91(1), 92-118.
12.
GuoL.LeeL. (2013). The critique of YouTube-based vernacular discourse: A case study of YouTube’s Asian Community. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 30(5), 1-16.
13.
HardakerC. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6, 215-242.
14.
JenkinsH. (2009). What happened before YouTube. In BurgessJ.GreenJ. (Eds.), YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (pp. 109-125). Malden, MA: Polity Press.
RuckriemG.Ang-SteinC.ErdmannJ. W. (2010, June20-24). Understanding media revolution: How digitalization is to be considered (1st ISCAR International Summer School). Lecture Conducted From Moscow State University of Psychology and Education (MGPPU), Moscow, Russia.
SmithA. (2006). Heteropatriarchy and the three pillars of white supremacy: Rethinking women of color in organizing. In SmithA.RichieB. E.SudburyJ. (Eds.), Women of color against violence, color of violence: The Incite! Anthology (pp. 66-73). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
22.
SueD. W.CapodilupoC. M.TorinoG. C.BucceriJ. M.HolderA. M. B.NadalK. L.EsquilinM. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271-286.
TwineF. W. (2010). A White side of Black Britain: Interracial intimacy and racial literacy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25.
TynesB. M.MarkoeS. L. (2010). The role of color-blind racial attitudes in reactions to racial discrimination on social network sites. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3, 1-13.
26.
ValenciaR. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
van DijkT. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4, 249-283.
28.
WongJ. (2011, March15). Ching chong! Asians in the library song (Response to UCLA’s Alexandra Wallace) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zulEMWj3sVA
29.
YamaguchiM. (2013). Reconsidering communicative competence in Web 2.0 environments: “Asians in the library” and four parodic responses on YouTube. Language & Communication, 33, 376-389.
