
Research article
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Spatially and temporally controlled drug delivery is an important field to address the limitations of conventional pharmaceutical administration. While many effective controlled drug delivery systems exist, the repertoire of systems that additionally present a beneficial mechanical environment to cells remains scarce. To address this, a comprehensive release study of fluorescein as a model drug, and the corticosteroid dexamethasone, from poly(
This work demonstrates the inclusion and release of small-molecule drugs from conducting polymer hydrogels, in an electrically triggered manner. This enables the release of drugs to cells in cell culture models, while ensuring a suitable mechanical microenvironment via the hydrogel component. The ability to reload the conducting polymer hydrogel with drug after release is demonstrated, along with excellent control over drug release, with minimal release without an electrical trigger.
Bone-related pathologies due to injuries, trauma, and disease are a burden on the current health system that will only continue to grow as the population’s life expectancy increases. The field of biomaterials aims to address these concerns by exploring, investigating, and optimizing bioregenerative grafts. In the context of bone regeneration, many biomaterials aim to achieve autograft-level regenerative properties, such as osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and low immunogenicity but also aim to address the disadvantages, such as the need for a secondary operation, donor site burden, and limited donor availability. Chitosan (CS) is a natural polymer well-studied in the field of biomaterials; it is known for its ease of fabrication, biocompatibility, antibacterial nature, and being a nonproteinaceous polysaccharide, which offers the advantage of low immunogenicity. However, CS lacks any osteogenic potential and is often combined with a bioceramic, creating a biocomposite scaffold. Bioceramics are ceramics specifically designed to aid bone regeneration due to their potential osteogenic properties. Although CS–bioceramic composites have been extensively studied, most research emphasizes their physicochemical properties, with limited attention to biological performance and
This review explores the potential of chitosan (CS)–bioceramic composites in bone regeneration, with a focus on
Angiogenesis is critical for effective wound healing and relies on the successful coordination of various cell types, including endothelial cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts. Adipose-derived stem cell extracellular vesicles (ADSC-EVs) have demonstrated proangiogenic properties and have been posited as a novel therapeutic to aid wound healing; however, their functional impact within human-derived multicellular models remains largely uncharacterized. This study explores the development and application of a 3D multicellular
This study presents the development of a 3D
Micronized collagen-based bioscaffolds are increasingly used in clinical applications for wound repair and soft tissue regeneration. This study compared the structural properties of four different commercially available micronized products derived from either reconstituted collagen (pRC), urinary bladder matrix (pUBM), or ovine forestomach matrix (mOFM, mOFMµ). The test articles were characterized by laser diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), packing density, differential scanning calorimetry, rheometry, proteolytic stability, agarose gel electrophoresis, and blood clotting index. Particle size and surface morphology, assessed by laser diffraction, SEM, and micro-CT, revealed marked differences in particle size, shape, and aggregation. Packing density ranged from 80.3 ± 2.7 mg/cm3 (mOFM) to 484.7 ± 17.8 mg/cm3 (pRC). Thermal analysis demonstrated the native structure of the OFM-based test articles (Tm, 59.80 ± 0.11°C and 58.15 ± 0.15°C) relative to pUBM and pRC (Tm, 41.06 ± 0.06°C and 40.59 ± 0.23°C). Rheological testing revealed that mOFM and mOFMµ had increased cohesive energy, indicating better mechanical resilience when the micronized materials were rehydrated to form a paste. The OFM-based test articles exhibited the greatest resistance to proteolytic digestion (T1/2, 12.730 ± 1.232 and 5.759 ± 0.1296). All the test articles, except for the reconstituted collagen product, demonstrated hemostasis in whole blood. Micronized reconstituted collagen showed immediate dissolution and no fluid absorption, hemostasis, or resistance to proteolytic digestion, whereas micronized OFM showed the greatest proteolytic stability and packing density. Substantial differences among the micronized bioscaffolds were revealed from the analysis, most likely due to their different source materials and manufacturing processes. Careful consideration of these parameters is warranted when selecting a micronized product for soft tissue applications.
This study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of four commercially available micronized collagen-based bioscaffolds, highlighting substantial differences in their structural and mechanical properties. Our findings suggest that bioscaffolds derived from the native extracellular matrix, particularly ovine forestomach matrix, exhibit superior proteolytic stability, mechanical cohesion, and hemostasis compared with the products made from reconstituted collagen. These differences are likely driven by the source material and processing method and underscore the critical importance of material selection in clinical applications. This work advances the understanding of bioscaffold performance and informs evidence-based decision-making.