Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Knowledge is limited regarding the adverse effects of therapeutic glucocorticoids on pediatric mental health outcomes. Glucocorticoid-induced psychosis (GIP) is a rare but severe side effect of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy in children and adolescents. This study identified reported pediatric cases of GIP, based on DSM-5 criteria, and defined its presentation, treatments, and outcomes.

A systematic review was completed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, including pediatric patients with incident psychosis following glucocorticoid treatment. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, interventions, outcomes, and long-term management were extracted from individual cases.

Of 1131 articles screened, 28 reports were included, comprising of 31 patients. The mean age was 13 years, and 61% of patients were male. The most common medical illnesses requiring administration of high dose glucocorticoids were asthma (23%) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (23%). The most common glucocorticoid used was prednisone (35%), and most patients (91%) received doses greater than or equal to 40 mg/day of prednisone. The range of time to symptom onset was 1 day to 7 months. Hallucinations alone (45%) were the most reported feature of GIP. Glucocorticoids were discontinued in 52% of cases, reduced in dosage in 32%, and 81% of affected patients were prescribed psychotropic medications. Long-term management plans and prophylactic psychotropic use were not mentioned in 52% of cases. Symptoms resolved in 90% of patients, and the majority (71%) had no recurrence of psychiatric symptoms.

GIP can generally be managed by tapering the causative agent with adjunctive second-generation antipsychotics if psychotic symptoms persist. All patients in this review had complete resolution or improvement of their psychotic symptoms; however, there is likely reporting bias due to the expected underreporting of negative outcomes. Managing clinicians must take a circumspect approach when prescribing high-dose glucocorticoids to minimize the risk of serious but preventable side effects.

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in children and adolescents is associated with substantial morbidity and increases the risk of future psychopathology. However, relatively few psychopharmacologic studies have examined treatments for GAD in pediatric populations, especially in prepubertal youth.

Children and adolescents aged 7–17 years of age with a primary diagnosis of GAD were treated with flexibly dosed escitalopram (10–20 mg daily, n = 138) or placebo (n = 137) for 8 weeks. Efficacy measures included the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) for GAD, Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale, Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS); safety measures included the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) as well as adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and electrocardiographic and laboratory monitoring.

Escitalopram was superior to placebo in reducing anxiety symptoms of GAD, as seen in the difference in mean change from baseline to week 8 on the PARS severity for GAD score (least squares mean difference = −1.42; p = 0.028). Functional improvement, as reflected by CGAS score, was numerically greater in escitalopram-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo (p = 0.286), and discontinuation owing to AEs did not differ between the two groups. Vital signs, weight, laboratory, and electrocardiographic results were consistent with previous pediatric studies of escitalopram.

Escitalopram reduced anxiety symptoms and was well tolerated in pediatric patients with GAD. These findings confirm earlier reports of escitalopram efficacy in adolescents aged 12–17 years and extend the safety and tolerability data to children with GAD aged 7–11 years.

NCT03924323.

This secondary analysis of data collected in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for the treatment of depression in adolescents aimed to test prediction models relating antidepressant (AD) initiation to clinical variables.

The primary study was an RCT where adolescents (ages 11–17) with depression were assigned one of three outpatient psychotherapies over 86 weeks. The current study tested five registered prediction models using data on adolescents not taking ADs at baseline (N = 337). Outcomes of interest included: AD initiation, change in depression severity, and self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs).

Findings from registered analytic strategies were not consistent with our a priori hypotheses; rather we unexpectedly observed a relationship between initiation of AD and increased risk of suicide attempts and suicidal ideation during the same time interval (p > 0.01). Sensitivity analyses found that: (1) higher depressive symptom severity and self-harm each predicted future AD initiation (p < 0.05), and (2) new-onset SITB was associated with AD initiation (p < 0.01).

Taken together, our results suggest that depression symptoms severity and SITBs may prompt AD initiation. Researchers may wish to further explore causal pathways relevant to the association ADs between SITBs. Clinicians need to be cognizant of high-quality guideline recommendations when prescribing ADs to adolescents.

Individuals with profound autism often present for inpatient care due to aggression. Diagnostic and treatment options are limited. Agitated catatonia is a treatable comorbidity in autism, which should be considered in cases of aggression. Preliminary data report high clinical response rates of catatonia in autism when treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), with poor response to lorazepam. However, access to ECT is often limited, especially in pediatric populations.

We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify cases of hyperactive catatonia with partial response to lorazepam in profoundly autistic children presenting to the pediatric medical hospital. Five cases were identified, all of whom were followed by the child and adolescent psychiatry consult-liaison service during admission and treated without the use of ECT. Data from the medical record were obtained after institutional review board (IRB) approval including the following: (1) treatment course, (2) Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) scores, and (3) Kanner Catatonia Rating Scale (KCRS) severity scores. The Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement (CGI-I) Scale was applied retrospectively to each case.

All five patients demonstrated clinically significant improvements. The average CGI-I score was 1.2. The average percentage reduction in the BFCRS and KCRS severity scores was 63% and 59%, respectively. Two of five patients were first stabilized with infusions midazolam and dexmedetomidine due to the symptom severity and then transitioned to long-acting oral benzodiazepines. Overall, four of five patients were stabilized with oral clonazepam and one of five with oral diazepam. Notably, four of five patients experienced an acute worsening of aggression, self-injury, and other catatonic symptoms with escalating dosages of antipsychotic treatment, which occurred before inpatient admission. All patients experienced resolution of physical aggression toward self and/or others, experienced improvement in their communicative abilities, and were able to return home or enter residential level of care upon discharge.

Given the limited availability of ECT and the unclear utility of lorazepam for hyperactive catatonia in autism, the use of long-acting benzodiazepines and/or midazolam infusion may offer a safe and readily available treatment alternative.