
Editorial
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Artificial intelligence (AI) is advancing rapidly, transforming biomedical research and health care through software applications ranging from diagnostics to drug discovery. Biobanking resides at a unique intersection of this technological transformation, serving both as a foundation for training new AI models and as a beneficiary of AI-driven optimization. High-quality, well-annotated biospecimens enable robust machine learning, while AI methods in turn support automation, quality control (QC), predictive analytics, and workflow efficiency for biobanking operations. Emerging applications include non-generative AI methods, which have been used to predict sample degradation, stratify populations, and assess tissue integrity. Generative AI and large language models expand these capabilities by enabling synthetic data generation, metadata extraction, natural language–based interaction with biobank systems for both operational needs and training. Furthermore, newer multiagent approaches now demonstrate how distributed AI frameworks can orchestrate end-to-end processes. Case examples highlight early successes in automated image-based QC, natural language processing for metadata extraction, and privacy-preserving synthetic datasets to enable secure data sharing. Looking ahead, AI promises to reshape biobanking as both an operational and scientific engine, with opportunities in business intelligence, workflow optimization, and personalized education. Challenges around data quality, interoperability, governance, and ethics remain, but the convergence of AI and biobanking points to a future where repositories evolve into intelligent, adaptive infrastructures that actively drive discovery, accelerate translational research, and advance precision medicine.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a powerful technology that can accelerate discovery at an unprecedented speed across all sectors of life. While some sectors already operate under established guidelines and regulations, others remain largely unchecked. With great power, however, comes great responsibility. This article, therefore, calls for a closer look at the use of AI in biobanking, a field that relies heavily on trust. AI, in return, is influenced by a plethora of interests that shape national strategies on its deployment. In relation to biobanking, political decisions play a key role in how health data are used. Ultimately, this article calls for AI governance here in the field of biobanking that employs the technology for the common good by calling for a commitment to shared responsibility by revisiting the bioethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice in the era of the employment of a transformative technology and its uncertain societal impacts.

Biobanks are indispensable for advancing biomedical research, yet they face challenges in operational inefficiency, underutilization of specimens, and ethical governance. The Biobank Ethical AI Compliance and Optimization Navigator (BEACON) addresses these challenges by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance sample management, optimize workflows, and ensure ethical compliance. BEACON integrates advanced methodologies, including retrieval-augmented generation systems, embedding-based semantic search, and GPT-powered response generation, to provide precise and transparent specimen allocation. Real-world validation through collaboration with the Advancing Sight Network demonstrated BEACON’s capability to enhance biobank workflows and foster community trust by offering transparent and explainable AI-driven decisions. BEACON’s modular design aligns with International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories Best Practices, ensuring scalability and adaptability across diverse biobank infrastructures. This work presents BEACON as a case study to illustrate the transformative potential of AI in addressing operational inefficiencies and promoting equitable, sustainable biobanking operations worldwide.
The efficient management of consent information is essential for the ethical and legal handling of biobank resources in accordance with participant consent. However, many traditional biobanks rely on paper-based consent forms, which are often illegible and unsuitable for processing at scale. This study aims to automate the reading and quality control of paper-based consent forms.
We optimized a proprietary optical character recognition (OCR) model to recognize handwritten Korean characters in a standard paper-based consent template. We generated 1000 synthetic consent documents for training. The test dataset, comprising synthetic standard consent forms (
This optimized OCR model showed an accuracy of 88.94% and 91.88% when tested on the 192-page standard and 1000-page nonstandard test datasets of paper-based consent forms, respectively. Moreover, when this OCR model was applied to consent forms in a routine of biobanking processes, it showed an accuracy of 91.25% and an F1-score of 0.91, indicating the model’s high overall performance and excellent generalization capability for data.
We optimized a proprietary artificial intelligence-based OCR tool to develop a highly efficient and reliable OCR-based consent management model for paper-based consent documents. This approach could contribute to the digital transformation of traditional biobanking processes of paper-based consent forms.
This study is part of the broader Stem Line project Mito-Cell-UAB073, specifically focusing on “Stem Cell Lines-Quality Control,” and aims to innovate in the field of Quality Control (QC) through a unique, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered model known as Life Cell AI UAB. This model utilizes deep learning algorithms and computer vision, allowing it to make accurate viability assessments of cell and stem cell lines based solely on static images captured through standard optical microscopes.
The aim of this study was to develop and validate an AI-driven, image-based model that reliably predicts cell line viability.
Our methodology involved training the Life Cell AI UAB model on single static images of cell lines using advanced computer vision and deep learning techniques. Performance evaluation was conducted on three independent blind test sets sourced from various biotechnology laboratories, allowing for assessment across diverse environments.
The Life Cell AI UAB model achieved a sensitivity of 82.1% in identifying viable cell lines and a specificity of 67.5% for non-viable lines across the test sets. Each blind test set exhibited a weighted accuracy above 63%, with a combined accuracy of 64.3%. Notably, predictions showed a clear distinction between correctly and incorrectly classified cells. The model outperformed traditional QC methods by improving accuracy in binary classification tasks by 21.9% (
The Life Cell AI UAB model represents a notable advancement in biobanking QC, offering a precise, standardized, and non-invasive method for assessing cell line viability. This model has the potential to streamline QC processes across laboratories, minimizing the need for time-lapse imaging and promoting uniformity in QC practices for both cell and stem cells.
This study investigated if improving a chatbot using user test feedback can enhance the perceived value of a chatbot for a specific biobanking use case. The chatbot was designed to guide participants in a research study around a biobank site to facilitate their data collection experience by conversing with them about what to do and where to go and answering any questions about the measurements, the research, or the biobank. A total of 32 test participants tested the chatbot and provided feedback about their experience, and the answers were analyzed to evaluate perceived value. The first group of users tested the initial version of the chatbot, and the second group tested the improved version of the chatbot. The results demonstrated that by including user feedback to design the chatbot, the perceived value in the second testing increased. Following these early-stage study results, it was determined that the chatbot was ready for deployment in the biobank.
Biobanks play a critical role in advancing biomedical research, yet they face persistent challenges related to sample findability, provenance verification, and cross-institutional collaboration. Existing systems lack standardization, suffer from data silos, and often fail to meaningfully engage donors, resulting in underutilized samples and inefficiencies. Blockchain technology, with its features of immutability, transparency, and decentralized trust, is well suited to help address these challenges. This paper explores the potential of blockchain-based decentralized biobanking, introducing key technological concepts such as distributed ledgers, smart contracts, and privacy-preserving cryptographic protocols. By enabling clear provenance trails, partially automated governance, and ethical compliance mechanisms, blockchain protocols can meaningfully address biobanking’s core issues of trust, coordination, and operational complexity. We examine practical applications in improving sample visibility and governance and ensuring donor-centric ethical practices. While implementation challenges such as privacy regulations, scalability, and organizational adaptation remain, the paper argues that blockchain technology provides a robust technical framework for enhancing biobank functionality and fostering collaboration. As the field evolves, blockchain-enabled biobanking networks hold significant potential to accelerate biomedical research.
Biobanks often lack standard mechanisms to keep donors connected to their biospecimens, reflecting a broken feedback loop that compromises trust, engagement, and scientific progress. Decentralized biobanking empowers patients to track their donations throughout the research journey, supporting personalized feedback and research collaboration via a privacy-preserving blockchain network. This case study explores operational feasibility of implementing decentralized biobanking for a large breast cancer biobank at a US academic medical center.
A mixed-methods case study of the groundwork, implementation, and stakeholder feedback for a real-world decentralized biobanking app pilot was conducted. Biobank members were recruited from February to April 2023. Operational feasibility was assessed via analysis of institutional stakeholder perspectives, pilot engagement, and de-bi app activity.
Physicians and other biobank stakeholders surfaced challenges surrounding managing expectations, balancing empowerment with clinical and research workflows, and navigating power dynamics between patients, physicians, scientists, and leadership. A total of 1080 participants enrolled over 10 weeks, including nearly 10% of the biobank with about 4000 biospecimens. During the pilot, biobank enrollment increased 65% versus the prior year, and there were no biobank withdrawals during or within 1 year following the pilot (
We established operational feasibility for the first step toward decentralized biobanking, informed by requirements to manage expectations, workflows, and power dynamics. Our technical solution demonstrated robust participant engagement and compatibility with established biobanks, suggesting potential to build trust and align incentives and identifying next steps for communications, sustainability, and governance.
Advancements in biomedical research depend on the quality and availability of biological samples. Despite their sophisticated storage capabilities, biobanks face significant challenges in sample management, with stored specimens often remaining unused and researchers struggling to access the required samples.
To analyze the challenges in biospecimen access and traceability, evaluate existing solutions, and propose a framework for integrated sample management in global research collaboration.
A scoping review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, supplemented by grey literature (2004–2024). The analysis included an examination of Biobank Information Management Systems and an evaluation of sample management systems, tracking technologies, and governance frameworks.
The analysis revealed fragmented management systems, with at least 38 different biobanking software solutions offering limited interoperability. Proprietary systems and vendor lock-ins create significant barriers to data sharing. Sample tracking shows the evolution from manual to digital systems; however, cross-institutional tracking remains challenging. Reproducibility issues account for significant challenges in research, whereas inefficient resource utilization persists, with 67% of biobanks citing underutilization as a major concern.
Addressing biobank sample access and traceability requires a shift from an institution-centric to an ecosystem-wide approach. Its success depends on integrating technological solutions such as Blockchain, the Internet of Things, and artificial intelligence with governance frameworks while ensuring alignment with stakeholder needs. Future developments should focus on implementing integrated traceability systems that support transparent and accountable sample management across the global research ecosystem.