Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The objectives of this study was to investigate the most appropriate hinge point for the alignment of adjustable collimators/trimmer bars in a telecobalt machine for obtaining acceptable dosimetric parameters of a telecobalt machine. Variations of relative output of the telecobalt machine with selection of different hinge points were also investigated. MCNP code was used for the present the study. A water phantom of dimension 50 × 50 × 40 cm³ having voxels each of volume 0.72 cm³ was used in our study for generating beam profiles and depth dose curves. When hinge points are selected at the periphery of the source bottom and the source top, flatness, symmetry and penumbra were found to be well within the recommended tolerance limits whereas values are far beyond with the hinge points selected at the centre of source bottom or the source top. Moreover, it was observed that the relative output of a telecobalt machine with hinge points at centre of the source bottom and the source top are appreciably lower than that of at periphery of source bottom particularly for smaller field sizes. This effect is due to the blockage of the part of the source volume in the radiation field. Therefore, hinge point for the alignment of adjustable collimators/trimmer bars should be selected either at periphery of source bottom or the source top for obtaining clinically acceptable flatness, symmetry and penumbra. However, selecting hinge point at the periphery of the source bottom for the alignment of the adjustable collimators/trimmer bars would be more appropriate as height of the source will vary depending on activity of the source used in the source capsule for given specific activity.

Keywords

Telecobalt machine Hinge point Adjustable collimator MCNP Profile and PDD Flatness Symmetry Penumbra

References

Khan

F. M.

The Physics of Radiation Therapy. Baltimore, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2010).

Kar

D. C.

Jayarajan

Sharma

S. D.

Singh

Subrahmanyam

G. V.

The Bhabhatron: An affordable solution for radiation therapy. Biomed. Imaging Interv J 4 E50–12, 62–68 (2008).

Sutherlan

W. H.

Smith

C. W.

Design principles of telecobalt collimators. Phy Med Biol 22, 1189–1196 (1977). DOI: 10.1088/0031–9155/22/6/012.

IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). Setting up a Radiotherapy Programme: Clinical, Medical Physics, Radiation Protection and Safety Aspects (2008).

George

J. R.

Kushwaha

Sastry

K. V. S.

Teletherapy sources with imported and indigenous ⁶⁰ Co activity. J Med Phys 34, 180–181 (ICMP 2008 Special Issue) (2009). DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.54854.

Briesmeister

MCNP-A general monte carlo N-particle transport code, Version B. Los Alamos National Laboratory (1997).

Shultis

J. K.

Faw

R. E.

An MCNP primer (2006).

Miro

Juste

Gallardo

Santos

Verdu

Cobalt therapy dosimetric calculations over a voxelized heterogeneous phantom: Validation of different monte carlo models and methodologies against experimental data. IEEE Transactions on Nucl Sc 53, 3808–3817 (2006). DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2006.886039.

Miro

Soler

Gallardo

Campayo

J. M.

Diez

Verdu

MCNP simulation of a theratron 780 radiotherapy unit. Radiat Prot Dosim 116, 65–68 (2005). DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci125.

10.

Sichani

B. T.

Sohrabpour

Monte carlo dose calculations for radiotherapy machines: Theratron 780-C teletherapy case study. Phys Med Biol 49, 807–818 (2004). DOI: 10.1118/1.1884385.

11.

Mora

G. M.

Maio

Monte carlo simulation of a typical ⁶⁰ Co therapy source. Med Phys 26, 2494–2502 (1999). DOI: 10.1118/1.598770.

12.

Central axis depth dose data for use in radiotherapy, Brit J Radiol Supplement No. 25 (1996).

13.

Kutcher

G. J.

Coia

Gillin

Hanson

W. F.

Leibel

Morton

J. M.

Palta

J. R.

Purdy

J. A.

Reinstein

L. E.

Svensson

G. K.

Weller

Wingfield

Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology-report of radiation therapy committee task group no. 50 (American Associations of Physicists in Medicine). Med Phys 21, 581–618 (1994).

14.

Quality Control of Medical Linear Accelerator: Current Practice and Minimum Requirements; Report 9 of The Netherlands Commission On Radiation Dosimetry (1996).

15.

Nath

Biggs

P. J.

Bova

F. J.

Ling

C. C.

Purdy

J. A.

Gein

J. V. D.

Weinhous

M. S.

AAMP code of practice for radiotherapy accelerators: Report of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 45 (American Associations of Physicists in Medicine). Med Phys 21, 1093–1121 (1994).

Effects of Alignment of Adjustable Collimator on Dosimetric Parameters of a Telecobalt Machine

Abstract

Keywords

References