Free accessResearch articleFirst published online 2012-3
Summary of Findings Tables: Presenting the Main Findings of Cochrane Complementary and Alternative Medicine-related Reviews in a Transparent and Simple Tabular Format
ClarkeM, AldersonP, ChalmersI. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.JAMA.2002Jun 5; 287(21): 2799–801.
2.
ClarkeM, HopewellS, ChalmersI. Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting.Lancet.2010Jul 3; 376(9734): 20–1.
ChalmersI. Using systematic reviews and registers of ongoing trials for scientific and ethical trial design, monitoring, and reporting. In: EggerM, DaveySG, AltmanDG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context.London: BMJ Books; 2001. p. 429–43.
5.
YoungC, HortonR. Putting clinical trials into context.Lancet.2005Jul 9-15;366(9480): 107–8.
6.
LauJ, AntmanEM, Jimenez-SilvaJ, KupelnickB, MostellerF, ChalmersTC. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med.1992Jul 23; 327(4): 248–54.
7.
DickersinK, ManheimerE. The Cochrane Collaboration: evaluation of health care and services using systematic reviews of the results of randomized controlled trials.Clin Obstet Gynecol.1998 Jun; 41(2): 315–31.
8.
AllenC, RichmondK. The Cochrane Collaboration: International activity within Cochrane Review Groups in the first decade of the twenty-first century.J Evid Based Med.2011 January 27 [Epub ahead of print].
SchünemannHJ, OxmanAD, VistGEChapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: HigginsJP, GreenS, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011; cited 2012 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/.
