This research gave voice to teaching assistants, exploring their experiences and perceptions. A small-scale case study approach was adopted, which aimed to interpret and explain human actions and thought through descriptions, capturing first person accounts. Qualitative data was collected from two focus group interviews. Participants were employed by Primary, Secondary and Special Schools. The research found that the main entry route into the role of teaching assistant was that of parent-helper. Previous skills and experience were not drawn upon or utilised by the schools. Differences in job titles were not reflected by the roles performed by the participants. For teaching assistants to be considered to provide ‘value for money’ a different approach to their deployment is required. The message voiced by teaching assistants was that there needs to be a clear career and related pay structure, with relevant job descriptions, which takes experience and qualifications into account.
AberM. S.MatonK. I.SeidmanE. (2011), Empowering settings and voices for social change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AinscowM.FarrellP.TweddleD.MalkiG. (1999), ‘The Role of LEA's in Developing Inclusive Policies and practices’, British Journal of Special Education26 (3), 136–40.
3.
ArmstrongF. (2008), ‘Inclusive Education’, in RichardsG.ArmstrongF. (eds), Key Issues for Teaching Assistants, London: Routledge.
4.
BasseyM. (1999), CaseStudy Research in Educational Settings, Buckingham: Open University Press.
5.
BelenkyM. F.ClinchyB. M.GoldbergerN. R.TaruleJ. M. (1986), Women's Ways of Knowing. The Development of Self Voice and Mind, New York: Basic Books.
6.
BlatchfordPBassettPBrownPMartinC.RussellA.WebsterR.HaywoodN. (2006), Deployment and Impact of Support Staff in Schools. Report on the findings from a national questionnaire survey of schools, support staff and teachers (Strand 1, Wave1, 2004), London: Institute of Education, University of London.
7.
BlatchfordPRussellA.BassetPBrownPMartinC. (2007), ‘The Role and Effects of Teaching Assistants in English Primary Schools (Years 4 to 6) 2000–2003’, British Educational Research Journal33 (1), 5–26.
8.
BlatchfordPBassettPBrownP.MartinC.RussellA.WebsterR. (2009), Deployment and Impact of Support Staff in Schools. Characteristics, Working Conditions and Job Satisfaction of Support Staff in Schools (Strand 1, Waves 1–3 in 2004, 2006 and 2008), London: Institute of Education, University of London.
9.
BlatchfordPBassettPBrownP.MartinC.RussellA.WebsterR. (2011), ‘The Impact of Support Staff on pupils' Positive Approaches to Learning and Their Academic Progress’, British Educational Research Journal37 (3), 443–64.
10.
BloorM.FranklandJ.ThomasM.RobsonK. (2001), Focus Groups in Social Research, London: Sage Publications Ltd.
11.
BrymanA. (2008), Social Research Methods, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
CohnM.KottkampR. B. (1993), Teachers: The missing voice in education, Albany N.Y., State University of New York.
13.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds) (2008), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, London: Sage Publications.
14.
Department for Children, Schools and Families (2008), School Workforce in England (including pupil:teacher ratios and pupil:adult ratios), Available online at www.dcsf.gov.uk (accessed 22 November 2009).
15.
Department for Children, Schools and Families (2010), ‘Numbers of Teaching Assistants and Other Support Staff’, Available online at www.dcsf.gov.uk/inyourarea/statics (accessed 4 September, 2010).
16.
Department for Education and Skills (1998), The national literacy strategy, London: DfES.
17.
Department for Education and Skills (1999), The national numeracy strategy, London: DfES.
18.
Department for Education and Skills (2003), Every Child Matters, London: DfES.
19.
Department of Education (2010), ‘School Workforce in England (Including Pupil: Teacher Ratios and Pupil: Adult Ratios), January 2010 (Provisional)’, Available online at www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway (accessed 3 December 2010).
FlickU. (2002), An introduction to Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, London: Sage.
22.
FookJ. (2002), Social work: Critical theory and practice, London: Sage.
23.
GiddensA. (1984), The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (2005), ‘Paradigmatic Controversies, and Emerging Influences’, in DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
HaslamS. A.ElemersN. (2011), ‘Identity Processes in Organisations’, in SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (eds), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research1, Springer: New York.
26.
HigginsS.KokotsakiD.CoeR. (2011), Toolkit of Strategies to Improve Learning, Durham: Durham University.
27.
HMI 434 (2002), Teaching Assistants in Primary Schools: An evaluation of the quality and impact of their work, Her Majesty's Inspectors.
28.
HutchingsM.SeedsK.ColemanN.HardingC.MansarayA.MaylorU.MintyS.PickeringE. (2009), Aspects of School Workforce Remodelling. Strategies used and the impact on Workload and Standards, DCSF-RR153 Available online at www.education.gov.uk (accessed 7 September 2010).
29.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2009), Voice in Qualitative Inquiry, Abingdon: Routledge.
30.
JanesickV. J. (2000), ‘The Choreography of Qualitative Research’, in DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, London: Sage.
31.
KitzingerC. (2004), ‘Feminist Approaches’, in SealeC.GubriumJ.GoboG.SilvermanD. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Newbury Park CA: Sage.
34.
MerriamS. B. (1988), Case study research in education: A qualitative approach, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
MuijsD.ReynoldsD. (2003), ‘The Effectiveness of the Use of Learning Support Assistants in Improving the Mathematics Achievement of Low Achieving Pupils in Primary School’, Educational Research, 45 (3), 219–30.
36.
Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (2010), Workforce reform in schools: Has it made a difference, Available online at www.ofsted.gov.uk (accessed 27 August 2010).
ParkerM.LeeC.GunnS.HeardmanK.HincksR.PittmanM.TownsendM. (2009), A Toolkit for the Effective Teaching Assistant, 2nd edn, London: Sage.
39.
PunchK. F. (2009), Introduction to Research Methods in Education, London: Sage.
40.
RennieD. L. (2009), ‘Constructing Client Agency in Psychotherapy Research’, Journal of Humanistic Psychology49, 193–206.
41.
RichardsG.ArmstrongF. (2008), Key Issues for Teaching Assistants Working in Diverse and Inclusive Schools, London: Routledge.
42.
RussellA.BlatchfordPBassettP.BrownPMartinC. (2005), ‘The Views of Teaching Assistants in English key Stage 2 Classes on Their Role, Training and job Satisfaction’, Educational Research, 47 (2), 175–89.
43.
StakeR. E. (1995), The Art of Case Study Research, London: Sage.
44.
SubbotinY.VoskoglouM. G. (2012), ‘Applications of Fuzzy Logic to Case-Based Reasoning’, International Journal of Applications of Fuzzy Sets1, 7–18.
45.
TeemanD.MundyE.WalkerM.ScottE.LinY.GallacherS. (2009), The support staff study: Exploring experiences of training and development, Available online at www.tda.gov.uk (accessed 15 July 2010).
46.
Training and Development Agency for Schools (2008), Sector Qualifications Strategy for Support Staff, Available online at www.tda.gov.uk (accessed 8 December 2008).
47.
VignolesV. L.SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK. (2011), ‘Introduction: Towards an Integrative View of Identity’, in SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (eds), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research1, Springer: New York.
48.
VincettK.CreminH.ThomasG. (2005), Teachers and Teaching Assistants Working Together, Buckingham: Open University Press.
49.
WedellK. (2005), ‘Dilemma's in the Quest for Inclusion’, British Journal of Special Education32 (1), 3–11.
50.
YinR. K. (2009), Case Study Research, Design and Methods, 4th edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
